﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">
<channel rdf:about="http://medrxiv.org">
<admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:medrxiv@cshlpress.edu"/>
<title>medrxiv Subject Collection: Pain Medicine Palliative Medicine</title>
<link>http://medrxiv.org</link>
<description>
This feed contains articles for medRxiv Subject Collection "Pain Medicine Palliative Medicine"
</description>

<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.05.14.26353232v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.05.11.26352918v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.05.05.26352397v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.05.08.26352717v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.05.04.26352365v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.05.06.26352590v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.05.01.26352197v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.04.21.26351212v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.04.21.26351027v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.04.20.26350810v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.04.23.26351589v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.04.24.26351704v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.04.21.26351437v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.04.10.26350614v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.04.07.26350260v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.04.02.26349577v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.26.26349247v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.29.26349666v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.27.26349555v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.23.26348899v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.24.26349122v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.20.26348805v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.22.26348998v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.19.26348793v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.18.26348727v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.17.26348624v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.11.26347999v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.12.26348178v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.06.26347723v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.06.26347785v1?rss=1"/>
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
<prism:eIssn/>
<prism:publicationName>medrxiv</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn/>

<image rdf:resource=""/>
</channel>
<image rdf:about="">
<title>medrxiv</title>
<url>https://www.medrxiv.org/sites/default/files/medrxiv_internal_logo.png</url>
<link>http://medrxiv.org</link>
</image>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.05.14.26353232v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Comparing palliative care quality between designated and non-designated cancer hospitals: A secondary analysis of bereaved family surveys 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.05.14.26353232v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
BackgroundThe quality of palliative care in non-designated cancer hospitals, where approximately 70% of deaths of patients with cancer occur, remains unevaluated. This study aimed to clarify the quality of palliative care in these hospitals by comparing patient characteristics and evaluating the quality of palliative care provided by bereaved families.

MethodsA questionnaire survey was conducted among bereaved family members of patients with cancer who died in 2018 at designated and non-designated cancer hospitals (excluding palliative care units). We compared the two groups regarding patient and bereaved family characteristics, quality assessment of palliative care (including Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale [MSAS]), care satisfaction, and the presence of end-of-life discussions.

ResultsIn total, 27,944 bereaved family members agreed to participate. The mean age at death was 73.2 ({+/-}11.9) and 79.7 ({+/-}10.9) years for designated and non-designated cancer hospitals, respectively (p < 0.001, Effect Size [ES] = 0.55). The mean MSAS total score (symptom intensity) was significantly higher for designated cancer hospitals than for non-designated cancer hospitals, even after adjusting for patient characteristics (p < 0.001, ES = 0.39). Conversely, the mean adjusted overall satisfaction was significantly higher in non-designated cancer hospitals (p < 0.001, ES = 0.21) than in designated cancer hospitals.

ConclusionsNon-designated cancer hospitals had older and less symptomatic patients than designated cancer hospitals. However, there was no significant clinical difference in the quality of palliative care, as assessed by the bereaved families.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Ito, S., Miyashita, M., Takahashi, R., Nakazawa, Y., Ogawa, A., Yotani, N., Hamano, J. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.05.14.26353232</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparing palliative care quality between designated and non-designated cancer hospitals: A secondary analysis of bereaved family surveys]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.05.11.26352918v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Real-World Changes in Movement-Evoked Pain and Gait in Adults With Knee Osteoarthritis 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.05.11.26352918v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
ObjectiveAdults with knee osteoarthritis often experience movement-evoked pain (MEP), and that pain has the potential to alter gait mechanics and influence disease progression. However, the associations between MEP and gait biomechanics have only been assessed in typical lab settings. Gait mechanics differ in the lab compared to in the real-world, thus it is unknown whether these associations between pain and gait translate to real-world settings. Therefore, this study aimed to measure concurrent changes in MEP and gait mechanics across three days of typical real-world activity.

DesignSeventeen participants with self-reported physician-diagnosed symptomatic knee osteoarthritis wore inertial measurement units on their more symptomatic limbs thigh and shank, as well as on both feet for three days of typical activity. Participants were sent 5 automated text messages a day and were instructed to complete a short 3-5 minute walk and self-report their MEP via a Numeric Rating Scale (0-10) during each of the walks. A random coefficients model was used to determine how gait speed, stride length, and knee and ankle range of motion was related to changes in pain intensity.

ResultsThe average MEP experienced during the instructed walks was 1.4 {+/-} 1.3 with individual participant average pain intensities ranging from 0 to 4.8. Greater MEP was associated with a 2.7{degrees} decrease in knee range of motion per unit increase in pain (95% CI [-4.8 -0.5], p = 0.02). Seven of the seventeen participants never reported a pain level of 0. Speed, stride length, and ankle range of motion did not differ by pain intensity.

ConclusionsIncreases in MEP were associated with decreases in knee range of motion. A 2.7{degrees} decrease in knee range of motion in response to a 1-unit change in pain is meaningful as 5{degrees} is generally considered the threshold for a meaningful difference in joint angles. With a change in pain intensity of 2 being common with daily activity, individuals may be experiencing meaningful changes in knee joint angles regularly. With gait mechanics being associated with disease progression, these daily acute fluctuations in pain may be influencing disease progression rates.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Mihy, J. A., Wagatsuma, M., Miller, S. N., Arch, E. S., Butera, K. A., Cain, S. M., Hafer, J. F. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-14</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.05.11.26352918</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Real-World Changes in Movement-Evoked Pain and Gait in Adults With Knee Osteoarthritis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.05.05.26352397v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Quantifying Biopsychosocial Risk Factor Domains for Chronic Pain Treatment Outcomes: An Umbrella Review with De Novo Meta-Analyses, Formal Uncertainty Propagation, and the Pain Amplifier Loop Framework (PALF) 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.05.05.26352397v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
ObjectiveTo conduct de novo meta-analyses quantifying the association of five biopsychosocial risk factor domains with chronic pain or related treatment outcomes, and to construct a composite risk index with formal uncertainty propagation for interventional pain medicine.

MethodsUmbrella review with de novo random-effects meta-analyses (DerSimonian-Laird and REML with Knapp-Hartung adjustment) across PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library through March 2026. Five risk factor domains were evaluated: (1) sleep disturbance, (2) pain catastrophizing, (3) metabolic/obesity, (4) preoperative opioid exposure, and (5) benzodiazepine co-prescription. Publication bias was assessed via Eggers test and PET-PEESE regression. Primary study overlap was quantified using the Corrected Covered Area (CCA). We constructed a primary three-domain composite (sleep, catastrophizing, metabolic) and a secondary expanded six-domain composite (adding opioid, BZD, smoking), using the logistic link function with binary risk factor inputs (present/absent); composite score 95% confidence intervals were computed via delta method variance propagation. Risk of bias of the composite was assessed using PROBAST [Wolff RF et al., Ann Intern Med 2019]; TRIPOD+AI compliance is reported in Supplementary S6 [Collins GS et al., BMJ 2024]. Reviewer process (per registered protocol PROSPERO CRD420261360881): screening, data extraction, risk-of-bias assessment (AMSTAR-2/PROBAST/ROBINS-I), and GRADE certainty rating are conducted independently by at least two reviewers -- SPM (confirmed co-reviewer, registered in PROSPERO) as primary rater, with an external third reviewer to be identified and confirmed prior to peer-reviewed submission; JAD acts as guarantor and does not perform primary review tasks. All quantitative outputs reported here are preliminary estimates pending completion of the external third-reviewer audit; a triple-validated version will be posted as a subsequent preprint update before peer-reviewed submission.

ResultsAdopted odds ratios: sleep disturbance 1.39 (95% CI 1.21-1.59; k=16; I{superscript 2}=51%), pain catastrophizing 2.10 (1.49-2.95; k=8; I{superscript 2}=0%), metabolic/obesity 1.43 (1.28-1.60; k=33), preoperative opioid exposure 5.32 (2.94-9.64; k=33; I{superscript 2}=99.96%; outcome: prolonged opioid use), and BZD co-prescription 1.77 (1.31-2.39; k=27; outcome: persistent opioid use). REML/Knapp-Hartung estimates produced wider confidence intervals for all loops (opioid: 1.87-15.13). PET-PEESE analysis suggested no substantial small-study effects for the sleep or catastrophizing loops. CCA=3.2% (slight overlap). Primary three-domain composite (sleep + catastrophizing + metabolic): delta method 95% confidence intervals for the composite score spanned 10-15 percentage points; PROBAST risk of bias: moderate. Secondary expanded six-domain composite (adding opioid, BZD, smoking): confidence intervals spanned 12-18 percentage points, crossing risk tier boundaries in moderate-risk patients; PROBAST risk of bias: high (driven by outcome heterogeneity in pharmacological domains).

ConclusionsFive biopsychosocial risk factor domains are independently associated with chronic pain or related treatment outcomes. The PALF composite index is presented as a structured analytical framework for future prospective validation, not as a deployable clinical tool. The primary three-domain composite (sleep, catastrophizing, metabolic) achieves outcome homogeneity at the cost of reduced domain coverage; the expanded six-domain composite encompasses the pharmacological burden at the cost of outcome heterogeneity. Both composites carry wide confidence intervals that preclude clinical application without individual patient data validation. No claim to clinical validity is made in the absence of prospective individual-patient-data validation.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Arranz-Duran, J., Perera Monje, S. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.05.05.26352397</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Quantifying Biopsychosocial Risk Factor Domains for Chronic Pain Treatment Outcomes: An Umbrella Review with De Novo Meta-Analyses, Formal Uncertainty Propagation, and the Pain Amplifier Loop Framework (PALF)]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.05.08.26352717v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Identifying community nurses contributions to end-of-life care: an online survey study 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.05.08.26352717v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
BackgroundDemand for community-based end-of-life care is rising globally, driven by ageing populations with increasingly complex needs. Community nurses have a central role in providing end-of-life care, yet the proportion of their time spent in supporting people in their final year of life remains unclear.

AimsTo investigate how much of community nurses daily work involves caring for people in their last year of life, and the extent to which end-of-life care visits are cancelled, deferred or undertaken to unsatisfactory standards.

DesignAnonymous online survey and multimethod analysis.

Setting/participantsUnited Kingdom survey of community nurses, circulated via professional networks, social media and snowball sampling, between 28 April and 27 June 2025.

ResultsA total of 1,471 nurses responded. Most worked in community and district nursing services (78.6%, 1156/1471) or specialist palliative care services (11.8%, 174/1471). Community and district nurses spent 23.5% (median) of their last shift providing end-of-life care. Over one in ten respondents (11.6% (171/1471) reported deferring at least one end-of-life visit during their last shift. Specialist palliative nurses were twice as likely to defer visits compared to community and district nurses (OR=2.48, 95% CI: 1.63-3.72, p<0.001). Staff shortages, demand exceeding capacity, and other systematic barriers contributed to deferring visits.

ConclusionsCommunity nurses play a vital role in end-of-life care, yet some of this important patient care is left undone or deferred. Investment in core and specialist nursing services, with efforts to enable and sustain this workforce, is urgently needed to meet globally growing demand for community-based end-of-life care.

What is already known about the topic?O_LIDemand for community end-of-life care is growing in many countries.
C_LIO_LICommunity nurses play a key role in end-of-life care, yet the volume and complexity of their daily work supporting people in the last year of life remains poorly understood.
C_LI

What this paper addsO_LINurses working in community and district nursing services spent a median of 23.5% of their last clinical shift providing end-of-life care.
C_LIO_LIHalf (52%) of respondents who provided end-of-life care during their last shift reported delivering one or more aspects of this care below their professional satisfaction, due to workload and capacity issues.
C_LIO_LIOver one in ten (11.6%) of nurses reported having deferred or cancelled end-of-life care visits on their last shift, significantly more specialist palliative care nurses (24%) than community and district nurses (10.4%).
C_LI

Implications for practice, theory or policyO_LIOur findings reveal a notable proportion of deferred and cancelled end-of-life care visits and care not undertaken to nurses professional satisfaction.
C_LIO_LISustained, intentional investment in core and specialist nursing services, together with improved system-wide integration, is needed to support this vital workforce.
C_LIO_LIFurther research is necessary to understand how community and district nurses and specialist palliative care nurses can most effectively prioritise end-of-life care within finite resources and competing demands.
C_LI
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Bowers, B., Fielding, M., Ashwell-Massey, E., Massou, E., Zolnhofer, N., Jayne, Z., Betts, M., Clifford, E., Bradley, T., McDonell, C., Oldman, C., Lawrence, S., Leary, A., Carson-Stevens, A., Barclay, S., Mourhli, J. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.05.08.26352717</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Identifying community nurses contributions to end-of-life care: an online survey study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.05.04.26352365v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Activity-Induced Changes in Pain and Knee Range of Motion in Adults With Knee Osteoarthritis 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.05.04.26352365v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
BackgroundPain with movement is common in adults with knee osteoarthritis (OA), but the effect of movement-evoked pain on gait is not well understood. This relationship is vital to understand as gait mechanics are associated with OA initiation and progression. Our current understanding of acute changes in pain and gait stems from extended bouts of walking, however these bouts likely dont represent real-world behavior. Therefore, understanding how gait changes with shorter, more intense bouts of activity may provide valuable insight into the pain experience.

MethodsAdults with (n=19) and without (n=19) knee OA wore inertial measurement units (IMUs) while completing bouts of walking before and after two bouts of stair navigation (two flights). We tested whether pain and gait (speed, stride length, and lower extremity joint ranges of motion (ROM)) changed differently between adults with and without knee OA in response to multiple bouts of stair activity.

FindingsThere were no significant interactions between group and stair bouts for any variable. When stratifying the OA group by those who did and did not experience pain, those who experienced a change in pain also had a greater change in early stance knee ROM in response to bouts of stairs.

InterpretationThe observed changes suggest that knee kinematics may be more sensitive to acute changes in pain than gait speed or stride length. These differences were detectable using IMUs and therefore our results support the use of IMUs to measure concurrent pain and gait mechanics in less controlled and real-world settings.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Mihy, J. A., Wagatsuma, M., Arch, E. S., Butera, K. A., Cain, S. M., Hafer, J. F. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-10</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.05.04.26352365</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Activity-Induced Changes in Pain and Knee Range of Motion in Adults With Knee Osteoarthritis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.05.06.26352590v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Prompt-engineering improves clinical safety of large language models for opioid equipotency conversion 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.05.06.26352590v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
BackgroundLarge language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in medical education and clinical decision-making, but their reliability in high-risk medication dosing remains unclear. Opioid rotation is a common task requiring precise calculations where errors may result in overdose or inadequate pain relief.

MethodsThirteen LLMs were tested using an API-based framework to ensure independent queries across trials. First, fictional clinical scenarios were tested to simulate real-world clinical situations involving opioid rotation; to test the effects of changes in wording, scenarios were revised into 4 "vignettes" showing the same clinical situation. Next, opioid pairs were tested with a random-dose paradigm across a clinically-pertinent range (5-120 mg daily morphine equivalents). LLM outputs were compared with expected values derived from reference standards. Accuracy was assessed using predefined safety thresholds: tight accuracy (0.85-1.15x expected dose) and broad accuracy (0.6-1.7x). We tested models naively and with prompts augmented with reference tables and unit explanations.

ResultsNaive models generally exhibited low tight-range accuracy across opioid pairs. For any given opioid pair, each model would consistently produce similar incorrect conversion ratios despite wide variability across opioid pairs and language models. Vignette wording changes accounted for 76% of within-scenario response variance. Reference-based prompt augmentation significantly improved performance, with over half of models achieving high proportions of conversions within tight accuracy for morphine-equivalent conversions.

ConclusionsWhile commercial LLMs demonstrated variable accuracy in the native state, prompt augmentation significantly improved their performance.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Marton, T., Corpman, D., Lai, L., Gabriel, R. A., Chen, Y. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-08</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.05.06.26352590</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prompt-engineering improves clinical safety of large language models for opioid equipotency conversion]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.05.01.26352197v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Challenging deficient inhibitory conditioned pain modulation as common chronic pain feature and detectable subgroup characteristic 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.05.01.26352197v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
Deficient descending pain inhibition assessed by conditioned pain modulation (CPM) is considered a common feature of various chronic pain disorders. Typically, CPM studies focus on one particular disorder making direct comparisons between disorders difficult. This cross-sectional study aimed to compare CPM effects between three clearly distinct chronic pain disorders and pain-free controls. Furthermore, patients were pooled with controls to explore whether subgroups showing different CPM effects could be separated independent of cohort membership. One hundred and forty participants (patients: 53 non-specific chronic low back pain [nsCLBP], 15 complex regional pain syndrome [CRPS], 14 neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury [painSCI]; 58 controls) were included. CPM effects were assessed in a remote, pain-free area using pressure pain thresholds as test stimulus and a cold water bath as conditioning stimulus. Cohort differences in CPM effects were analyzed using linear mixed models. The presence of subgroups showing different CPM effects was tested using latent class linear mixed models. CPM effects differed between cohorts (p = 0.011), driven mainly by reduced inhibitory CPM effects in patients with nsCLBP compared to patients with painSCI. Latent class analysis detected 3 subgroups with varying degrees of significant inhibitory CPM effects (ps [&le;] 0.002). All subgroups comprised patients and controls. These results oppose deficient descending pain inhibition as a common feature of chronic pain disorders. Additionally, the failure to identify subgroups without inhibitory CPM effects within a heterogenous patient/control sample challenges the utility of deficient CPM as predictor of chronic pain or treatment efficacy.

PerspectiveInhibitory conditioned pain modulation, a measure of descending pain inhibition, is not consistently impaired across distinct chronic pain disorders. Furthermore, identifying individuals with impaired conditioned pain modulation within a heterogenous sample is difficult. Thus, for conditioned pain modulation to be clinically useful, its variability needs to be better understood.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Sirucek, L., De Schoenmacker, I., Gorrell, L. M., Luetolf, R., Langenfeld, A., Brunner, F., Rosner, J., Baechler, M., Wirth, B., Hubli, M., Schweinhardt, P. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.05.01.26352197</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Challenging deficient inhibitory conditioned pain modulation as common chronic pain feature and detectable subgroup characteristic]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.04.21.26351212v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Nociceptive stimulation suppresses spinal beta oscillations in awake human epidural recordings 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.04.21.26351212v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
IntroductionNociceptive processing in the human spinal cord remains difficult to study directly, and its oscillatory dynamics are poorly understood. Oscillatory activity in the beta band (13-35 Hz) is of particular interest, as beta rhythms are widely associated with sensorimotor network state and transient desynchronisation following salient input.

ObjectivesIdentify the effects of nociceptive laser thermal stimuli on beta-band oscillatory activity in epidural spinal field potentials.

MethodsWe recorded epidural spinal field potentials during noxious thermal laser stimulation of the unaffected foot using externalised thoracic spinal cord stimulation electrodes in two subjects with neuropathic pain (persistent spinal pain syndrome type 2).

ResultsTime-frequency analysis combined with cluster-based permutation testing revealed reproducible suppression of spinal beta oscillations (13-35 Hz) following nociceptive stimulation. Beta suppression was spatially organised along contiguous rostro-caudal bipolar channels and most prominent within the first 0-200 ms after stimulation. Both low- (13-20 Hz) and high-beta (20-35 Hz) sub-bands contributed to early effects, with low-beta suppression predominating rostrally and while high-beta suppression was more ubiquitous. Inter-trial coherence increases were modest and not consistently aligned with early suppression, suggesting induced desynchronisation rather than a dominant phase-reset response.

ConclusionNociceptive input produces early, spatially organised modulation of spinal beta oscillation dynamics in awake subjects.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Shah, R. S., Nair, A. M., Macdonald, M., Hart, M., Pereira, E. A. C. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.04.21.26351212</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Nociceptive stimulation suppresses spinal beta oscillations in awake human epidural recordings]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.04.21.26351027v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Contributions to palliative and end-of-life care by community health nursing services: improving care through national and regional service evaluations 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.04.21.26351027v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
Aim(s)To describe adult palliative and end-of-life care provision by community health nursing services using a: O_LINational dataset (2013-2024) to report patterns in service provision over time.
C_LIO_LIRegional dataset (2022/23, 2023/24 and 2024/25) to describe palliative and end-of-life care activities.
C_LI

DesignSecondary analyses of existing national and regional datasets.

MethodsWe used national data to describe the populations served; workforce; referrals; unique service users seen annually; contacts; time on caseload; care delivered/care locations; support to other teams/processes; and deferred care. Regional data was used to examine palliative and end-of-life care activities in the context of all nursing care delivered.

ResultsNationally, referrals to community health nursing services increased steadily from 4,000 to 6,000 per 100,000 weighted population between 2013 and 2024, while unique service users remained stable (around 2,600-2,800). Median average time on caseload reduced markedly from over 150 days to around 50 days, despite stable contact frequency (median 23 total contacts per service user) and duration (median 26 minutes for face-to-face contacts).

Regional data showed that palliative and end-of-life care consistently accounted for 9.6% of all community nursing clinical time (30-32 hours per 1,000 population annually) across three years, even as total care hours declined. A disproportionate amount of palliative and end-of-life care occurred out-of-hours.

ConclusionIncreasing referrals and shorter time on caseloads indicate a system under pressure. Time spent on palliative and end-of-life care by community health nursing teams has remained stable over time, despite growing population need. Workforce capacity, skill mix, and out-of-hours provision need to align to support high-quality, person-centred care in the community.

Implications for the profession and/or patient careThis evidence informs better planning to ensure sufficient provision and workforce in community health nursing.

Patient and public contributionPatients, family carers and public members contributed to interpreting findings and implications for practice.

What does this paper contribute to the wider global clinical community?O_LIProvides combined national and regional data to describe the scale and nature of palliative and end-of-life care delivered by community health nursing services over time.
C_LIO_LIFindings give a detailed picture of how community health nursing services are under pressure because of increasing referrals and being required to deliver a greater breadth of tasks.
C_LIO_LIModels of community health nursing are changing with shorter care episodes and significant palliative and end-of-life care workload (with distinctive challenges out-of-hours).
C_LI
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Pask, S., Khamis, A., Jarrett, T., Davies, J. M., Evans, C. J., Murtagh, F. E. M. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.04.21.26351027</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Contributions to palliative and end-of-life care by community health nursing services: improving care through national and regional service evaluations]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.04.20.26350810v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Efficacy of virtual reality treatment of phantom leg pain: Results of a randomized clinical trial 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.04.20.26350810v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
Approximately 90% of individuals with limb amputation experience the persistent sensation of the missing extremity and up to 85% experience debilitating pain in the missing limb, a condition termed phantom limb pain (PLP). In this registered clinical trial (NCT05296265), we tested the efficacy of Virtual Reality (VR) treatment of phantom leg pain in a sample of transtibial and transfemoral amputees with PLP. Adaptive randomization was used to assign 36 participants (19 transfemoral, 17 transtibial) recruited across three study sites to eight sessions of an active or distractor VR treatment. The active VR treatment required leg movements and provided virtual visual feedback. The distractor treatment was a commercially available VR treatment for pain based on the principle of distraction. The primary outcome measures were the comparison of ratings of pain intensity and quality at baseline versus immediately post-treatment and at 1-week and 8-week follow up. The secondary outcome measure, obtained in each session, was average pain intensity since the last treatment. Pain on both intensity and quality measures was significantly reduced with moderate effect sizes for the active treatment only; intensity effects persisted at 1-week follow-up, and quality effects persisted at 8-weeks follow-up. Ratings of pain intensity since the last treatment showed a large effect size for the active treatment and was significant for both treatments. This clinical trial showed significant efficacy of VR treatment for PLP, particularly for an active treatment providing virtual visual feedback of the amputated limb.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Ambron, E., Williamson, R., Li, J.-S., Karrenbach, M., Rombokas, E., Coslett, H. B., Buxbaum, L. J. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.04.20.26350810</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Efficacy of virtual reality treatment of phantom leg pain: Results of a randomized clinical trial]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.04.23.26351589v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Acceptance of approaching death in cancer and non-cancer patients according to general practitioners; a European Study in Primary Care 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.04.23.26351589v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
BackgroundAcceptance of death is an important aspect of a  good death and an indicator of high-quality palliative care. Limited evidence exists on the extent to which patients accept their approaching death and which socio-demographic or end-of-life care characteristics are associated with acceptance, in both cancer and non-cancer patients.

MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cross-sectional survey in representative GP networks in the Netherlands and Italy (2013-2015), and Belgium and Spain (2013-2014). GPs registered all deceased adult patients in their practice, reporting health and care characteristics in the last three months of life and the level of acceptance of approaching death on a four-point scale ("1. Yes, completely" to "4. No, not at all"). Non-sudden deaths were included, totaling 2,796 patients (1,474 cancer; 1,322 non-cancer).

ResultsAcceptance was recorded for 97% of patients (n=2,713), of which 17% were assessed as  unknown. GPs assessed that 30% of patients had complete acceptance, with similar proportions in cancer and non-cancer patients (30% vs 29%). Multivariable logistic regression showed that older age (OR 1.03, 95%CI 1.02-1.04, p<0.01), country (OR 0.27 Belgium, OR 0.11 Italy, OR 0.10 Spain; reference: Netherlands), and palliative care by the GP until death (OR 1.39, 95%CI 1.07-1.79, p<0.01) were independently associated with complete acceptance.

ConclusionSocio-demographic, contextual, and end-of-life care factors influence GP-assessed acceptance of approaching death, whereas a cancer diagnosis does not. These findings emphasize the importance of culturally sensitive, age-appropriate, and palliative care-oriented approaches to support patient acceptance at the end of life.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Zijlstra, M., Raijmakers, N., Veldhuijzen, N., van den Block, L., Moreels, S., Vega-Alonso, T., Miccinesi, G., Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.04.23.26351589</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Acceptance of approaching death in cancer and non-cancer patients according to general practitioners; a European Study in Primary Care]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.04.24.26351704v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Graph-Based Synthetic EHR Generation with Improved Quality-Privacy Trade-offs for Opioid Use Disorder Prediction 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.04.24.26351704v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
Electronic health record (EHR) data are critical for clinical research but are challenging to share due to privacy and re-identification risks, particularly in sensitive domains such as opioid use disorder (OUD). Synthetic data generation offers a promising alternative; however, existing methods often struggle to preserve complex multivariate dependencies while maintaining a strong balance between data utility and privacy. The recently proposed MIIC-SDG framework leverages multivariate information theory and Bayesian network modeling to capture dependency structures and introduces Quality-Privacy Scores (QPS) to evaluate this tradeoff, yet its capacity to model nonlinear relationships and support multi-task predictive settings remains limited. In this work, we propose a multi-task extension of TabGraphSyn, a graph-based generative framework for privacy-preserving EHR synthesis. The method constructs patient similarity graphs from high-dimensional tabular data and learns topology-aware embeddings via a graph convolutional network, which are then incorporated into a conditional variational autoencoder for synthetic data generation. Unlike prior approaches, our framework jointly models multiple clinically relevant OUD targets, including 180-day opioid abuse outcome, opioid concept group, and opioid source concept group, enabling preservation of label-dependent relationships across tasks. We evaluate TabGraphSyn against MIIC-SDG under a unified framework including multi-task predictive utility, distributional similarity, identifiability risk, membership inference risk, and QPS-based metrics. Results on the NIH All of Us dataset show that TabGraphSyn achieves a stronger overall utility-privacy balance, outperforming MIIC in most headline metrics, including higher synthetic multi-task ROC-AUC (0.5278 vs 0.4932), MetaQPS (AM: 0.0215 vs 0.0115; HM: 0.0391 vs 0.0223), while slightly underperforming in macro F1 (0.2321 vs 0.2840). These findings demonstrate improved modeling of nonlinear dependencies and more favorable quality-privacy trade-offs in multi-task settings, supporting its use for realistic and privacy-aware synthetic EHR data generation.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Alam, M. A. U., Shalhout, S. Z. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-27</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.04.24.26351704</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Graph-Based Synthetic EHR Generation with Improved Quality-Privacy Trade-offs for Opioid Use Disorder Prediction]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.04.21.26351437v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Recovering Clinical Detail in AI-Generated Responses for Low Back Pain Through Prompt Design 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.04.21.26351437v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
IntroductionLarge language models are increasingly being used in healthcare. In interventional pain medicine, clinical reasoning is essential for procedural planning. Prior studies show that simplified prompts reduce clinical detail in AI-generated responses. It remains unclear whether this reflects knowledge loss or simply prompt-driven suppression of information.

MethodsWe performed a controlled comparative study using 15 standardized low back pain questions representing common interventional pain questions. Each question was submitted to ChatGPT under three conditions, professional-level prompt (DP), fourth-grade reading-level prompt (D4), and clinician-directed rewriting of the D4 response to a medical level (U4[-&gt;]MD). No follow-up prompting was allowed. Three physicians independently rated responses for accuracy using a 0-2 ordinal scale. Clinical completeness was determined by consensus. Word count and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) were also measured. Paired t-tests compared conditions.

ResultsAccuracy was highest with professional prompting (1.76). Accuracy declined with the fourth-grade prompt (1.33; p = 0.00086). When simplified responses were rewritten for clinicians, accuracy returned to baseline (1.76; p {approx} 1.00 vs DP). Clinical completeness followed the same pattern showing DP 80.0%, D4 6.7%, U4[-&gt;]MD 73.3%. Fourth-grade responses were shorter and less complex. Upscaled responses were more complex and similar in length to professional responses. Inter-rater reliability was low (Fleiss {kappa} = 0.17), but trends were consistent across conditions.

ConclusionsReduced clinical detail under simplified prompts appears to reflect constrained output rather than loss of knowledge. Clinician-directed reframing restores omitted content. LLM performance in interventional pain depends strongly on prompt design and intended audience.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Basharat, A., Hamza, O., Rana, P., Odonkor, C. A., Chow, R. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-23</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.04.21.26351437</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Recovering Clinical Detail in AI-Generated Responses for Low Back Pain Through Prompt Design]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.04.10.26350614v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Benefit take-up in the last year of life: a population-based study using linked data for England and Wales 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.04.10.26350614v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
ContextIn the UK, and in other countries, people living with a terminal illness are eligible for financial support to help with the costs of serious illness and to support their dignity and independence. This study investigates the take-up of benefits in the last year of life and identifies sociodemographic, clinical, and geographical factors associated with underclaiming.

MethodsRetrospective cohort study using linked mortality, Census and benefits data for all people who died aged 16+ from chronic illnesses in England and Wales between 1 May 2018 and 30 April 2021. Outcome was receipt of non-means tested disability benefits in the last 12 months of life. We describe geographical variation in take up, and association with sociodemographic, clinical and geographical exposures using Poisson models.

FindingsOur population included 1,049,493 eligible decedents, with an overall take-up rate of 65.9%. After adjusting for sociodemographic factors, variation in take-up by cause of death was wide: liver disease 44% (95% CI 43-45%), heart failure 52% (51-52%), cancer 62% (61-62%), dementia 75% (74-75%), and neurodegenerative diseases 90% (88-91%). Across Local Authorities, the age-and-sex-standardised take-up varied from 53% to 78%; rates were generally higher in more deprived areas, but not uniformly.

ConclusionsIn England and Wales, 1 in 3 people who die from expected causes (120,000 each year) do not receive the benefits for which they are eligible. Our analysis uses novel data linkages and highlights clinical and sociodemographic groups and geographical areas that could be targeted with proactive take-up initiatives.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Davies, J. M., Fairs, A., Ayoubkhani, D., Marshall, S., Diggle, M., Bradshaw, A., French, M., Stone, J., Hussain, J., Fimister, G., Harding, R., Sleeman, K., Nafilyan, V. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-11</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.04.10.26350614</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Benefit take-up in the last year of life: a population-based study using linked data for England and Wales]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.04.07.26350260v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Meta-analytic Evidence for Four Amplifier Loops in Chronic Pain Chronification: The Pain Amplifier Loop Framework (PALF) as a Conceptual Risk Index for Prospective Validation 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.04.07.26350260v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
ObjectiveTo quantify the effect size of four biopsychosocial amplifier loops on chronic pain outcomes through umbrella review and meta-analysis, and to propose a composite meta-analytic risk index for interventional pain medicine requiring prospective validation.

MethodsWe searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library through March 2026 for studies reporting adjusted odds ratios linking (1) sleep disturbance, (2) pain catastrophizing, (3) metabolic/inflammatory markers, and (4) preoperative opioid use/polypharmacy to chronic pain chronification or treatment failure. DerSimonian-Laird random-effects meta-analyses were performed per loop. Publication bias was assessed via Eggers test (k[&ge;]8). Effect sizes were integrated into a logistic regression model--the Pain Amplifier Loop Framework (PALF). Neurobiological convergence on TLR4/NF-{kappa}B microglial signaling was examined.

ResultsPooled odds ratios adopted for the PALF model: sleep disturbance 1.39 (95% CI 1.21-1.59; Runge et al., k=16; I{superscript 2}=51%), pain catastrophizing 2.10 (1.49-2.95; k=8; I{superscript 2}=0%), metabolic/fat mass 1.43 (1.30-1.57; Shiri et al., k=33), preoperative opioid use 5.32 (2.94-9.64; Lawal et al., k=33; I{superscript 2}=99.96%), and opioid-benzodiazepine co-prescription 1.77 (1.53-2.05; Lee et al., k=27; I{superscript 2}=79%). Eggers test showed no significant asymmetry for sleep (p=0.21) or catastrophizing (p=0.84). The PALF yields a Systemic Load Score and failure probability P=1/(1+eCC), enabling low (<0.30), moderate (0.30-0.60), and high ([&ge;]0.60) risk stratification.

ConclusionsFour biopsychosocial amplifier loops independently and substantially increase chronic pain risk. The PALF proposes a transparent, hypothesis-driven composite risk index anchored in meta-analytic evidence from >500,000 participants. As a meta-analytic synthesis rather than a fitted prediction model, the PALF requires prospective multicenter validation with individual patient data before clinical application. PROSPERO registration: CRD420261360881.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Arranz-Duran, J. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.04.07.26350260</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Meta-analytic Evidence for Four Amplifier Loops in Chronic Pain Chronification: The Pain Amplifier Loop Framework (PALF) as a Conceptual Risk Index for Prospective Validation]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.04.02.26349577v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Beyond intensity: Pain distribution shapes healthcare- and treatment-seeking beliefs in individuals with and without clinical pain 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.04.02.26349577v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
SummaryPain distribution (PD) influences healthcare-seeking and treatment decisions. Participants valued a reduction in PD at approximately one third of the value of an equivalent reduction in pain intensity.

Pain is commonly described in sensory terms, yet its spatial characteristics--localization and distribution--are rarely quantified. We investigated whether lay beliefs about pain distribution (PD) influence theoretical decisions to seek care and treatment preferences. In a representative cross-sectional survey (N=503; 49% with pain), participants completed thought experiments in which both visually presented PD patterns (small, moderate or large) and pain intensity (NRS 2, 5, 8/10) were systemically varied. For each scenario, they rated the likelihood of (i) seeking professional help (LoSH) and (ii) taking analgesic medication (LoTM). Participants also completed a spatial-intensity trade-off task (SITT), in which they chose between a fixed 20% reduction in intensity and variable reductions in PD (20-80%). A reversed version contrasted a fixed 80% reduction in PD with variable reductions in pain intensity. LoSH and LoTM increased significantly with greater PD (p<0.001), mirroring the gradient observed for pain intensity. In the SITT, participants choice followed a sigmoid-like function (p<0.001): 1% reduction in intensity was treated as equivalent to approximately a 3% reduction in distribution, indicating a systematic valuation of PD. This ratio was lower in individuals experiencing pain compared to pain-free individuals. Moreover, 63% reported that PD should be routinely considered in pain management alongside intensity. Results suggest that PD is not merely a trivial descriptor, but a meaningful determinant of healthcare-related decision-making beliefs. Incorporating spatial metrics into clinical assessment and research may better capture how individuals implicitly evaluate pain severity.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Frankenstein, T., Intert, S., Szikszay, T. M., Katra, M., Elsner, B., Coghill, R. C., Luedtke, K., Adamczyk, W. M. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-04</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.04.02.26349577</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Beyond intensity: Pain distribution shapes healthcare- and treatment-seeking beliefs in individuals with and without clinical pain]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.26.26349247v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
PainWaive: A Consumer-grade Digitally Delivered EEG Neurofeedback Intervention for Chronic Low Back Pain 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.26.26349247v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is persistent and refractory, affecting 20-30% of population worldwide. Neurofeedback has been explored as a potential non-pharmacological intervention for chronic pain, although evidence in CLBP remains limited. This study evaluated PainWaive, a consumer-grade digitally-delivered neurofeedback intervention targeting multiple pain-related frequency bands recorded over the sensorimotor cortex in individuals with CLBP.

In a multiple-baseline experimental design, four participants completed daily assessments of pain severity and pain interference during randomly-assigned baseline phases of 7, 10, 14, and 20 days, followed by 20 sessions of the PainWaive intervention over four weeks. Daily pain assessments continued during the post-intervention and follow-up phases. Participants rated PainWaives usability and acceptability at post-intervention. Anxiety, depression, wellbeing, and sleep disturbance were assessed at three timepoints.

Aggregated Tau-U analyses indicated a large effect (-0.67) on pain severity from baseline to intervention and very large from baseline to post-intervention (-0.92) and follow-up (-0.92) phases. Large effects (-0.63, -0.62, and -0.70) were also observed for pain interference. Individual-level analyses showed significant reductions across all participants, with visual inspection confirming progressive decreases over time. The intervention was rated usable and acceptable by all participants, while psychological outcomes were mixed and varied across participants.

The findings provide promising evidence that the PainWaive neurofeedback intervention may reduce pain severity and pain interference in some individuals with CLBP. By prioritising accessibility, usability, and self-administration, PainWaive supports a foundation for more patient-centred, technology-enabled approaches to chronic pain management. Further evaluation of this approach in randomised trials is required to establish efficacy.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Hesam-Shariati, N., Ermolenko, E., Chowdhury, N., Zahara, P., Chen, K. Y., Lin, C.-T., Newton-John, T., Gustin, S. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.03.26.26349247</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[PainWaive: A Consumer-grade Digitally Delivered EEG Neurofeedback Intervention for Chronic Low Back Pain]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.29.26349666v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Association of Suzetrigine With Postoperative Outcomes Versus Opioid Analgesics: Propensity-Matched Study 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.29.26349666v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
BackgroundPerioperative pain management modality potentially influences psychiatric morbidity and healthcare utilization. The opioids have been most commonly used for managing postoperative pain and carry a high degree of risk for creating mood disorders, anxiety, sleep disturbances, and healthcare burdens. A novel non-opioid analgesic, Suzetrigine, may be able to effectively manage postoperative pain without some of the psychological and economic risks that come from the use of opioids. In this study, we measured psychiatric outcomes and emergency department (ED) usage among postoperative patients who received either suzetrigine or opioids.

MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX US Collaborative Network, encompassing 64 healthcare organizations. Adult patients (> Age 18 years) who underwent surgery and received suzetrigine were compared with patients who underwent surgery and received opioids. Propensity score matching (1:1) performed to match cohorts based on demographic factors (age, gender, racial/ethnic status), social determinants of health (ICD-10 Z55-Z65), family histories of substance abuse and psychiatric disorders (Z81.x), surrogate measures of prior healthcare utilization, and pre-existing clinical severity using Elixhauser-Charlson comorbidity proxies (hypertensive diseases [I10-I15], diabetes mellitus [E08-E13], ischemic heart disease [I22-I25], and chronic pulmonary disease [J42-J47]). Matching also included behavioral risk factors (tobacco use and physical inactivity) and body mass index (BMI). Following matching, there were 2,221 patients in each cohort. The primary outcome assessed within one year after surgery was ED utilization, depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and sleep disorders. Risk estimates and survival analyses were used to compare the outcomes.

ResultsIn propensity-matched analyses, suzetrigine use was associated with a reduction in multiple psychiatric outcomes and healthcare utilization compared to opioid analgesics. There was less ED utilization in the suzetrigine cohort (5.9% v 13.1%, RR 0.45, p< .001). The psychiatric outcomes were also lower in the suzetrigine cohort than the opioid cohort, including depression (3.1% v 4.7%, RR 0.65, p= .005), anxiety (4.7% v 7.2%, RR 0.65, p< .001), PTSD (0.5% v 1.4%, RR 0.36, p= .002), and sleep disorders (4.2% v 6.0%, RR 0.71, p= .008). The survival analysis suggested an earlier onset of psychiatric diagnosis among the opioid recipients.

ConclusionIn a matched real-world cohort of surgical patients, suzetrigine use was associated with lower short-term rates of selected postoperative outcomes compared with opioid analgesics.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Verma, A. S., Sharma, V., Chowdhary, R., Pathak, A., Soni, S., Gandhari, V., Hillery, T., Gupta, R. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.03.29.26349666</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association of Suzetrigine With Postoperative Outcomes Versus Opioid Analgesics: Propensity-Matched Study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-31</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.27.26349555v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Dementia and End-of-Life Shared Decision-Making Among Older US Adults 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.27.26349555v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
IntroductionEnd-of-life decision-making poses unique challenges for individuals with dementia and their family caregivers as cognitive decline shifts decision-making responsibility to surrogates.

MethodsUsing 2010-2022 Health and Retirement Study (HRS) exit interview data, we compared advance directive completion, decision-making needs near death, involvement of others in decision-making, and concordance between expressed preferences and care received among decedents with and without dementia. Analyses incorporated HRS exit interview sampling weights, primary sampling units, and strata to account for the complex multistage probability design of HRS and produce nationally representative estimates of U.S. older adult decedents ([&ge;]50 years). Weighted descriptive statistics and design-adjusted Wald tests were used to compare groups.

ResultsAmong 5,389 decedents, 1,010 (weighted 17.7%) had dementia prior to death. Decedents with dementia were more likely to have completed advance directives than those without dementia (81.3% vs. 69.1%, p<.001). However, they also had significantly higher decision-making needs in the final days of life (54.3% vs. 47.2%, p<.001). Children or grandchildren were more frequently involved in care decisions for decedents with dementia (63.9% vs. 45.6%, p<.001). Despite differences in decision-making processes, most decedents in both groups expressed preferences for comfort-focused care, and preference-care concordance exceeded 90% in both groups.

ConclusionsFindings suggested that dementia reshaped the structure and intensity of the shared decision-making process by increasing surrogate engagement and decisional demands, underscoring the importance of early advance care planning and structured support for family caregivers to sustain goal-concordant care.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Xie, Z., Hong, Y.-R., Armstrong, M. J., Wang, X., Jacobs, M. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.03.27.26349555</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Dementia and End-of-Life Shared Decision-Making Among Older US Adults]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.23.26348899v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields in Chronic Pain Management: a KDM6B-Mediated Modulation Mechanism Hypothesis 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.23.26348899v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
BackgroundChronic pain affects millions of patients globally and remains therapeutically challenging. While conventional pharmacological approaches have limitations and side effects, pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy represents a non-invasive biophysical approach. However, the biological mechanisms underlying PEMF efficacy remain poorly understood.

ObjectiveThis study starting from a multi-center post-market surveillance (PMS) data of 81 patients treated with SyntheXer (a CE-marked Class IIa PEMF device) proposes a mechanistic framework that links observed clinical effects to epigenetic modulation via the histone demethylase KDM6B.

Materials and MethodsPatients with inflammatory and degenerative disorders causing chronic pain were treated with SyntheXer across four Italian rehabilitation centers. Pain was assessed using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) before and after treatment. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, ANOVA, correlations, and Cohens d effect size. Proposed mechanisms were based on and extrapolated from molecular and biochemical studies demonstrating KDM6B-dependent epigenetic changes in response to specific PEMF sequences.

ResultsMean NPRS score decreased significantly from 8.07 {+/-} 1.65 (PRE) to 1.79 {+/-} 1.67 (POST), representing a 6.28-point reduction (p < 0.001; Cohens d = 3.1). Ninety-eight percent of patients showed pain reduction [&ge;]2 points. No adverse effects were reported. Subset analysis revealed consistent responses across inflammatory (n=19) and degenerative (n=62) pathologies.

DiscussionWhile the observational nature of these data precludes definitive causal attribution, the magnitude of clinical response combined with emerging evidence of KDM6B-mediated epigenetic remodeling suggests a plausible biological basis for PEMF efficacy. Specifically, sequence-dependent electromagnetic stimulation may promote the production of and release of anti-inflammatory cytokines and pain resolution through histone demethylation and chromatin remodeling ultimately acting on the expression modulation of such regulatory cytokines.

ConclusionsThese post-market surveillance data provide clinical evidence of PEMF effects in chronic pain management. The proposed epigenetic mechanism, while requiring further experimental validation and mechanistic confirmation, offers a science-based framework for understanding PEMF biological action and guiding future investigations.

Trial RegistrationThis is part of a retrospective observational post-market surveillance study conducted in compliance with EU MDR 2017/745 requirements.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Sacco, C., Ferraro, A. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.03.23.26348899</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields in Chronic Pain Management: a KDM6B-Mediated Modulation Mechanism Hypothesis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.24.26349122v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Structural and Functional Alterations of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Across Chronic Pain Cohorts 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.24.26349122v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
BackgroundChronic pain is associated with structural and functional brain alterations, particularly within prefrontal, insular, and cingulate cortices. The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) shows consistent structural abnormalities across chronic pain conditions, whereas findings on intrinsic functional connectivity (FC) remains inconsistent. Anchoring FC analyses to structural alterations may help identify consistent patterns across chronic pain conditions.

MethodsWe employed a voxel-based morphometry (VBM)-guided, seed-based resting-state FC approach. Structural and functional MRI data were obtained from patients with chronic neck pain (CNP; n=21) and healthy controls (HC; n=25). Regions showing significant gray matter volume (GMV) differences were used as seeds for whole-brain FC analysis. Associations with pain intensity and pain-related fear were examined. Findings were further evaluated in an independent cohort with chronic primary pain (CPP; n=38).

ResultsVBM revealed reduced GMV in the left DLPFC in CNP compared with HC, replicated in CPP. Seed-based FC analysis demonstrated reduced connectivity between the left DLPFC and the right hippocampus in CNP, with a similar pattern in CPP. In CNP, GMV in the DLPFC was positively associated with DLPFC-hippocampal connectivity (r = 0.45, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.74, p = 0.043). Reduced DLPFC-hippocampal connectivity was associated with higher activity avoidance (r = -0.50, 95% CI -0.77 to -0.09, p = 0.021), whereas no associations were observed with pain intensity.

ConclusionsThese findings indicate consistent structural and functional alterations across chronic pain cohorts.

Reduced DLPFC-hippocampal connectivity may reflect altered interactions between prefrontal and hippocampal circuits involved in pain-related cognitive and affective processes.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Kawate, M., Takaoka, S., Shinohara, Y., Wu, Y., Mashima, Y., Tanaka, C., Ihara, N., Yamada, T., Kosugi, S., Wakaizumi, K. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.03.24.26349122</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Structural and Functional Alterations of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Across Chronic Pain Cohorts]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.20.26348805v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Working memory in chronic pain: evidence for task-specific rather than global differences 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.20.26348805v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWO_ST_ABSBackgroundC_ST_ABSChronic pain is often accompanied by cognitive complaints, but evidence for global working-memory problems is mixed. We tested whether working-memory performance differences in chronic pain are global or task-specific and whether model-based analysis could help distinguish differences in processing efficiency, response caution or sensory/motor speed.

MethodsIn a preregistered online case-control study, 99 adults with mixed chronic pain conditions and 87 pain-free controls completed visuo-verbal, visuo-spatial and auditory-temporal n-back tasks at low (0/1-back) and high (2-back) load. Accuracy and reaction times were analysed with mixed effects models. Drift diffusion modelling decomposed performance into processing efficiency (drift rate), response caution (threshold separation) and non-decision (sensory/motor) time.

ResultsHigher load reduced accuracy and slowed responses in both groups. There was no evidence of a global working-memory deficit in the chronic pain group. The clearest group difference was a larger load-related drop in accuracy in the auditory-temporal task (odds ratio 0.64, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.73), persisting after adjustment for mood, sleep and fatigue. Load-related slowing in visuo-verbal (6.7% slower, 5.1% to 8.2%) and auditory-temporal tasks (3.6% slower, 1.7% to 5.4%) were attenuated after adjustment. Diffusion modelling showed no evidence for sensory/motor slowing, but rather greater response caution in the auditory-temporal task and small efficiency (drift rate) reductions in low-load visual conditions.

ConclusionsThe results do not support a global working-memory capacity loss account in this mixed chronic pain sample. Rather, they suggest task-specific performance differences, most evident in auditory-temporal processing, with response caution as a plausible contributor.

Significance StatementThis preregistered multimodal online study found no evidence of a global working-memory deficit in a mixed chronic pain sample. Instead, the clearest difference emerged in the auditory-temporal n-back task under higher load, with diffusion modelling suggesting a contribution of greater response caution rather than reduced processing efficiency or sensory-motor slowing.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Halicka, M., Scheller, M., Brown, C. A. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.03.20.26348805</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Working memory in chronic pain: evidence for task-specific rather than global differences]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.22.26348998v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Meta-analytic Evidence for Four Amplifier Loops in Chronic Pain Chronification: Development of the Pain Amplifier Loop Framework (PALF) Risk Score 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.22.26348998v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
ObjectiveTo quantify the effect size of four biopsychosocial amplifier loops on chronic pain outcomes through systematic review and meta-analysis, and to develop a logistic regression-based risk stratification tool for interventional pain medicine.

MethodsWe searched PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library through March 2026 for studies reporting adjusted odds ratios for associations between (1) sleep disturbance, (2) pain catastrophizing, (3) metabolic/inflammatory markers, (4) preoperative opioid use/polypharmacy, and chronic pain chronification or treatment failure. Random-effects meta-analyses (DerSimonian-Laird) were performed for each loop. Effect sizes were translated into a composite logistic regression model -- the Pain Amplifier Loop Framework (PALF) -- using ln(OR) as first-order coefficient approximations. The neurobiological convergence of all four loops on TLR4-mediated microglial activation was examined.

ResultsForty-four studies (>500,000 participants) were included. Pooled odds ratios were: sleep disturbance OR=1.80 (95% CI 1.65-1.96; k=16; I2=51%), pain catastrophizing OR=2.11 (95% CI 1.71-2.61; k=8; I2=0%), metabolic/fat mass OR=2.02 (95% CI 1.32-3.09; k=7), preoperative opioid use OR=4.48 (95% CI 2.87-6.97; k=6; I2=84%), and opioid-benzodiazepine co-prescription OR=2.62 (95% CI 1.76-3.89; k=7; I2=79%). All four loops converge on TLR4/NF-{kappa}B microglial signaling. The PALF model produces a Systemic Load Score (Z) and probability of interventional failure P=1/(1+e-Z), enabling stratification into low (<0.30), moderate (0.30-0.60), and high ([&ge;]0.60) risk categories.

ConclusionsFour amplifier loops independently and substantially increase chronic pain risk, with the iatrogenic/opioid loop showing the largest effect. The PALF provides a transparent, clinically actionable risk score requiring prospective validation.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Arranz-Duran, J. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.03.22.26348998</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Meta-analytic Evidence for Four Amplifier Loops in Chronic Pain Chronification: Development of the Pain Amplifier Loop Framework (PALF) Risk Score]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.19.26348793v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Subjective and Objective Cognitive Functioning in Chronic Pain: Distinct Associations with Multidimensional Symptom Burden and Resting-State EEG 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.19.26348793v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
Cognitive dysfunction is increasingly recognized as an important feature of chronic pain (CP). However, subjective cognitive complaints and objectively measured cognitive performance frequently diverge. Whether and how these two aspects of cognitive functioning differentially relate to the broad symptomatology and brain function in CP remains unclear. Here, 114 individuals with CP completed patient-reported outcome measures on cognitive functioning and multidimensional CP symptoms, as well as a visuospatial working memory task, and resting-state EEG. Bayesian correlations, network analyses, and Bayesian regression models examined how subjective and objective cognitive functioning relate to multidimensional CP symptoms and EEG activity/connectivity, while controlling for age and sex. Additional models tested whether EEG associations were independent of broader symptom burden. Results indicated that subjective and objective cognitive functioning were uncorrelated. Subjective cognitive functioning was strongly associated with psychosocial symptoms, whereas objective cognitive functioning was largely independent of broader symptom burden. EEG revealed associations between subjective cognitive functioning and bilateral frontotemporal beta connectivity; however, these relationships were substantially attenuated after accounting for broader CP symptom burden. Objective cognitive functioning showed no robust associations with EEG. These findings indicate a dissociation between subjective cognitive complaints and objective cognitive performance in CP. Subjective cognitive complaints were primarily associated with psychosocial symptom burden and beta-band hypoconnectivity. In contrast, objective cognitive performance was unrelated to the broader symptomatology of CP and EEG measures. This dissociation may inform more targeted interventions, optimize the allocation of cognitive assessment resources, and ultimately improve long-term functional outcomes in CP.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Zebhauser, P. T., Bott, F. S., Baki, E., May, E. S., Ploner, M. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.03.19.26348793</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Subjective and Objective Cognitive Functioning in Chronic Pain: Distinct Associations with Multidimensional Symptom Burden and Resting-State EEG]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.18.26348727v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Ecological Momentary Assessments of daily pain experiences in bothersome and high-impact chronic pain 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.18.26348727v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
High-impact chronic pain (HICP), defined as persistent pain that substantially limits daily activities, affects millions of adults and poses a public health challenge. Yet relatively little is known about how HICP manifests in peoples daily lives. To address this gap, this study used the comprehensive Ecological Momentary Assessment of pain (cEMAp) to assess pain-related experiences four times per day over 7 days in individuals with chronic low back pain. Based on the classification using the Graded Chronic Pain Scale-Revised, we compared individuals with HICP (n = 66) with those in the next most severe pain category, bothersome chronic pain (n = 41), defined as having similar pain frequency but less frequent interference with daily activities. On each prompt, participants completed 2-hour assessments of pain intensity, interference, catastrophizing, behaviors, coping strategies, and pain characteristics. In line with prior research, both groups reported similar pain intensity levels, but the HICP group reported more frequent interference with physical, mental, and social activities. There were no group differences in daily mood or catastrophizing. Exploratory analyses suggested that many daily experiences were similar across groups, with differences observed in selected pain qualities, coping strategies, and pain behaviors. Additional analyses of response distributions showed some similarity across groups in many experiences. Overall, although individuals with HICP on average experience higher pain interference in daily life, levels of many day-to-day experiences are similar between the two groups. Data obtained with cEMAp complement traditional retrospective assessment by providing a detailed view of chronic pain in everyday life.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Walentynowicz, M., Junghaenel, D. U., Mackey, S. C., Von Korff, M., Stone, A. A. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.03.18.26348727</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ecological Momentary Assessments of daily pain experiences in bothersome and high-impact chronic pain]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.17.26348624v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Identification of LPO and RTN4R as Proteomic Signatures of Pain Persistence: An Exploratory Analysis of the UK Biobank 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.17.26348624v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
BackgroundThe transition from acute to chronic pain represents a failure of physiological resolution. While systemic immune cell counts and androgen levels have been associated with this transition, the specific molecular mediators remain poorly understood. We sought to identify the functional proteomic drivers of long-term pain persistence and determine their independence from systemic factors.

MethodsWe identified a longitudinal persistence cohort (N=3,221) within the UK Biobank who reported acute pain at baseline and were followed for resolution or persistence. Using the Olink Explore 3072 platform, we screened 2,923 serum proteins. Multivariable competition models were employed to evaluate the independent predictive power of top proteomic hits alongside systemic monocyte counts and circulating free testosterone levels, adjusted for age and sex.

ResultsOur proteome-wide screen identified Lactoperoxidase (LPO) as a dominant and highly significant predictor of pain persistence. In the fully adjusted competition model, each standard deviation increase in LPO was associated with a 59% increase in the odds of persistence (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.25-2.07, p < 0.001). Notably, after accounting for LPO, systemic monocyte counts (OR 0.93, p = 0.55) and testosterone levels (OR 0.82, p = 0.46) were no longer significant predictors. Nogo Receptor (RTN4R) also remained a significant predictor in independent models (OR 1.44, p = 0.002).

ConclusionsThese exploratory findings demonstrate that long-term pain persistence is associated with specific functional molecular signatures rather than broad systemic cell quantity. The dominance of LPO suggests that secretory peroxidase-driven pathways may be a primary barrier to pain resolution. Furthermore, the association of RTN4R identifies neural repair inhibition as a candidate driver of persistence. These proteins are candidates for further mechanistic investigation.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Lehrer, S., Rheinstein, P. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.03.17.26348624</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Identification of LPO and RTN4R as Proteomic Signatures of Pain Persistence: An Exploratory Analysis of the UK Biobank]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.11.26347999v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Efficacy of tDCS and EEG Neurofeedback, individually and combined, on Neuropathic Pain following spinal cord injury: Protocol for a Randomised Controlled Trial 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.11.26347999v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
Neuropathic pain (NP) affects approximately 60% of individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). Existing pharmacological treatments provide only modest relief and are often limited by adverse effects, while non-pharmacological options show small effects at best. As such, there remains a need for accessible, mechanism-informed treatments for SCI-NP. This protocol describes a trial evaluating two promising home-based neuromodulatory interventions for SCI-NP - electroencephalography neurofeedback (EEG-NF) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) - tested both independently and when applied in combination. We will employ a partially double-blinded (i.e. 1 treatment blinded, the other not), 2x2 factorial randomised controlled trial. Adults with chronic SCI-NP (N=192) will be randomised to: (1) EEG-NF + active tDCS, (2) EEG-NF + sham tDCS, (3) active tDCS alone, or (4) sham tDCS alone, in addition to treatment as usual. Participants will complete 20 home-based sessions over 5 weeks. The primary outcome is change in overall pain severity with the primary endpoint being 6 weeks post-randomisation, with secondary endpoints at 16, 26 and 52 weeks post-randomisation. Secondary outcomes (worst pain intensity, pain interference, sleep, depressive symptoms, health-related quality of life) will be assessed at 6 weeks, 16 weeks, 26 weeks and 52 weeks post-randomisation. This will be the first large-scale trial of home-based EEG-NF and tDCS for SCI-NP. If found to be effective, these scalable interventions could be integrated into routine care and inform further optimisation of neuromodulation strategies for managing SCI-NP.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Chowdhury, N., Hesam Shariati, N., Quide, Y., Zahara, P., Herbert, R., Restrepo, S., Chen, K., McIntyre, A., Newton-John, T., Middleton, J., Craig, A., Jensen, M. P., Butler, J., Briggs, N., McAuley, J., Gustin, S. M. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.03.11.26347999</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Efficacy of tDCS and EEG Neurofeedback, individually and combined, on Neuropathic Pain following spinal cord injury: Protocol for a Randomised Controlled Trial]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.12.26348178v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Palliative Care in Humanitarian Settings: An International Survey on Perceived Importance and Readiness among Health Emergency Response Unit Delegates 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.12.26348178v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
ObjectivePalliative care is recognized as an essential component of humanitarian health response, yet its delivery in field operations remains limited. This study assessed perceived importance, readiness to deliver, training needs, and operational barriers among Red Cross and Red Crescent Health Emergency Response Unit (ERU) delegates.

MethodsA cross-sectional, web-based survey (LimeSurvey) was conducted among health professionals with ERU deployment experience between 1 October and 31 December 2024. The questionnaire captured demographics, background, preparedness, barriers, and training preferences. Descriptive statistics summarized categorical variables, and free-text responses underwent content analysis by two reviewers. Quantitative and qualitative strands were analyzed separately and integrated in interpretation.

FindingsOf 173 responses, 114 met inclusion criteria (including 11 partial [&ge;]50% complete). Half (50.9%) had over ten years of humanitarian experience. Most (71%) considered palliative care extremely important, yet only 49.1% reported providing it, usually limited to pain relief; 25.4% reported none. Barriers included insufficient time or resources (56.1%), lack of training (49.1%), absent policies (48.2%), cultural barriers (47.4%), limited knowledge (36.8%), and restricted opioid access (28.1%). Among prescribers, 85.1% felt comfortable prescribing opioids, but stockouts (54.2%) and regulations (44.9%) constrained use. Most delegates (75.4%) had delivered bad news without structured communication training. 83% reported no palliative care training, though 91.4% endorsed dedicated, blended learning combining online and practical components.

ConclusionERU delegates view palliative care as essential yet under-implemented. Integrating core competencies, standard protocols, and medicine access pathways--supported by competency-based training--could strengthen humanitarian readiness and align with WHO Emergency Medical Team standards.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Kaade, H., May, S., Allsop, M., kamp, M., Heinze, M., Muehlensiepen, F. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-13</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.03.12.26348178</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Palliative Care in Humanitarian Settings: An International Survey on Perceived Importance and Readiness among Health Emergency Response Unit Delegates]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.06.26347723v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Initiation of buprenorphine as part of pain management approach to trauma patients in the intensive care unit with a history of opioid use disorder: A QI Study 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.06.26347723v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
BackgroundBuprenorphine use in the intensive care unit (ICU) remains not well studied despite growing perioperative guidance supporting its continuation and initiation for patients with opioid use disorder (OUD). Trauma ICU admissions represent a critical opportunity to address untreated OUD, as well as continuation of an already established treatment plan for OUD, yet barriers limit its adoption in this setting.

MethodsThis single-center quality improvement study evaluated for inpatient buprenorphine prescribing patterns following provider education at a tertiary academic trauma center. Adult trauma ICU patients with OUD admitted between 2016-2024 were identified through the institutional trauma registry. Patients with pre-admission buprenorphine were excluded, yielding a cohort of 95 patients: 24 buprenorphine-exposed (initiated in the hospital) and 71 controls. Primary outcomes included pain scores and opioid requirements (morphine milligram equivalents, MME) during the first 48 hours. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, and 90-day readmission.

ResultsBaseline characteristics were similar between groups. No statistically significant differences were observed in first recorded pain scores (median 8 vs. 10; p=0.35), mean 48-hour pain scores (7.40 vs. 7.76; p=0.44), or total opioid consumption (232 vs. 119 mg MME; p=0.45). Median hospital LOS (16 vs. 19 days; p=0.48) and 90-day readmission rates (42.3% vs. 33.3%; p=0.40) were also comparable.

ConclusionInpatient buprenorphine initiation in trauma ICU patients with OUD was not associated with worse pain control, increased opioid requirements, or adverse clinical outcomes. These findings support the integration of buprenorphine into critical care pathways as a safe strategy to address OUD during hospitalization and improve long-term recovery continuity.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Khan, A., Rosario-Rivera, B. L., Shivanekar, S. P., Sperry, J. L., Emerick, T. D., Kaynar, A. M. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-09</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.03.06.26347723</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Initiation of buprenorphine as part of pain management approach to trauma patients in the intensive care unit with a history of opioid use disorder: A QI Study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.06.26347785v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Exploring Electroencephalography for Chronic Pain Biomarkers: A Large-Scale Benchmark of Data- and Hypothesis-Driven Models 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.06.26347785v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
Resting-state electroencephalography (EEG) has been proposed as a scalable source of biomarkers for chronic pain, but its clinical potential remains uncertain. To systematically evaluate this potential, we benchmarked nine modeling strategies, spanning conventional machine learning with handcrafted features to state-of-the-art deep learning. Across 72 configurations of signal representations and model architectures, we trained models to predict self-reported pain intensity, using chronological age decoding as a positive control. Pain prediction performance was limited (R=0.15), with the best results achieved by conventional connectivity-based models. In contrast, age was robustly decoded from the same dataset (R=0.53), confirming technical efficacy. These findings indicate that resting-state EEG contains limited information about inter-individual differences in chronic pain intensity, making it unlikely to yield clinically actionable biomarkers in cross-sectional settings. Instead, its potential may lie in intra-individual modeling of pain dynamics, which could advance individualized mechanistic insights and more personalized treatment of chronic pain.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Bott, F. S., Turgut, O., Zebhauser, P. T., Adhia, D. B., Ashar, Y. K., Day, M. A., Granovsky, Y., Jensen, M. P., Wager, T. D., Yarnitsky, D., Rueckert, D., Ploner, M. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.03.06.26347785</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exploring Electroencephalography for Chronic Pain Biomarkers: A Large-Scale Benchmark of Data- and Hypothesis-Driven Models]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
