﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">
<channel rdf:about="http://medrxiv.org">
<admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:medrxiv@cshlpress.edu"/>
<title>medrxiv Subject Collection: Pain Medicine Palliative Medicine</title>
<link>http://medrxiv.org</link>
<description>
This feed contains articles for medRxiv Subject Collection "Pain Medicine Palliative Medicine"
</description>

<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.28.26364170v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.28.26364225v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.29.26364287v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.24.26363855v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.23.26363767v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.10.28.25336335v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.22.26358710v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.24.26358500v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.31.26359372v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.24.26357716v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.03.26359604v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.04.26359660v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.05.26359702v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.07.26359966v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.07.26359945v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.14.26360457v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.13.26360409v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2025.12.05.25341696v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.20.26360943v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.26.26359760v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.08.27.25334555v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.11.10.25339944v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.11.10.25339944v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.11.17.25340426v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.11.17.25340426v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.01.02.26343333v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.01.02.26343333v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.01.02.26343350v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.01.06.26343556v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.01.23.26344608v1?rss=1"/>
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
<prism:eIssn/>
<prism:publicationName>medrxiv</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn/>

<image rdf:resource=""/>
</channel>
<image rdf:about="">
<title>medrxiv</title>
<url>https://www.medrxiv.org/sites/default/files/medrxiv_internal_logo.png</url>
<link>http://medrxiv.org</link>
</image>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.28.26364170v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Meeting the needs of people with pulmonary fibrosis: patient perspectives on improving palliative care provision: a qualitative study 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.28.26364170v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
Background: Palliative care is suboptimal in pulmonary fibrosis. Symptom burden is high despite evidence-based interventions, guidelines, and information resources. The application of existing knowledge and methods to optimally manage palliative and end of life care for people with pulmonary fibrosis in the UK has not been realised. Aim: To establish patient views and understanding of how palliative care services and approaches can better meet the needs of people with pulmonary fibrosis. To identify the current barriers and facilitators to receiving palliative care services. Design: Qualitative exploration of patient views via semi-structured interviews and focus groups. Content analysis was conducted. Setting/Participants: The study was conducted from March to August 2024 within an Interstitial Lung Disease Specialist Centre, based in an NHS acute Trust. Results: Two focus groups and four interviews were conducted, involving nine patients. Four overarching themes were identified as to how palliative care can better meet the needs of this group: (1) establishing mechanisms for identifying and addressing palliative care needs; (2) open channels of communication with healthcare professionals; (3) the importance of a palliative care approach within respiratory, community and specialist services; and (4) support for unpaid/family carers. Conclusions: Patients highlighted the importance of person-centred principles and services that adapted to their needs (such as real-time telephone support), rather than services that imposed their own requirements on the patients. Understanding how existing palliative care provision can meet this standard could help improve the palliative and end of life care for people with pulmonary fibrosis.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Barry, C., Gardener, C., Farquhar, M., Karwa, I., Wilson, A. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-10-02</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.09.28.26364170</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Meeting the needs of people with pulmonary fibrosis: patient perspectives on improving palliative care provision: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-10-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.28.26364225v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Relevance-Based Prediction: A Transparent, Patient-SpecificApproach to Predicting Medical Outcomes 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.28.26364225v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
Accurate prediction of individual medical outcomes is essential for optimizing treatment allocation amid rising costs, coverage denials, and limited clinical resources. Traditional predictive models, including linear regression and neural networks, rely on average effects and cannot tailor predictions to the specific circumstances of individual cases. We present relevance-based prediction (RBP), a model-free and task-specific method that predicts outcomes as weighted averages of observed cases, with weights determined by a rigorously defined and theoretically justified measure of relevance. Unlike model-based methods that rely on fixed calibrated parameters, relevance-based prediction revisits the original data for each prediction and customizes both the cases and variables used. We illustrate RBP by applying it to predict opioid treatment outcomes and demonstrate that it provides case-specific insights unavailable from conventional models, including how each prior case informs a prediction, how each variable affects each predictions reliability and value, and how reliable each prediction is before it is made. These individualized insights may prevent misleading average-based decisions and reduce harmful or suboptimal treatment.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Robinson, C. L., Turkington, D., Lee, L., Kritzman, M., Yong, R. J. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-09-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.09.28.26364225</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Relevance-Based Prediction: A Transparent, Patient-SpecificApproach to Predicting Medical Outcomes]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-09-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.29.26364287v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Six recommendations for improving care and support in advanced COPD: evidenced from a population-based, mixed method, multiple-perspective, longitudinal study 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.29.26364287v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
BackgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a progressive condition with high symptom burden. Advanced COPD management should relieve symptoms, optimise daily functioning and reduce carer burden, yet there is limited enactment of policy-advocated person-centred approaches to care and support. The Living with Breathlessness Study sought to establish evidence-based recommendations to inform a new paradigm to improve care and support in advanced COPD.

MethodsComprehensive multiple-perspective longitudinal evidence was collected on care, support, functioning and needs in advanced COPD from a population-based cohort of over 500 patients, their unpaid/family carers and health care professionals through semi-structured interviews and validated outcome measures over an 18-month period. Quantitative data analysed using standard descriptive statistics, numerical and univariate analyses, and qualitative data using a Framework approach.

Recommendations were then generated through three linked strategies: (1) an expert multidisciplinary group, (2) a stakeholder workshop and (3) a stakeholder survey.

ResultsSix inter-related recommendations emerged, linked by the concept of proactive person-centred care, supported by action points to enable delivery. Recommendations in brief: (1) stop focusing on the challenge of prognostication as a barrier to meeting need, (2) change targets to incentivise person-centred care, (3) enable identification of patient support needs, (4) identify and support carers, (5) identify and respond to psychological morbidity, (6) change societal understandings of COPD, breathlessness, palliative care and informal carers. The recommendations garnered significant support from stakeholders, with caution regarding ease of implementation.

ConclusionsEnactment of the resulting six evidence-based recommendations, through their action points, could inform a new paradigm to improve care and support in advanced COPD recognising the slow relentless progression of non-malignant disease, and its effect on patients and their carers. They hold potential for other patients and unpaid/family carers who are living in between conventional disease management and end-of-life care, and for those HCPs striving to support them.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Farquhar, M., Ewing, G., Moore, C., Gardener, C., Holt Butcher, H., Burge, P., Ling, T., Living with Breathlessness Study Team ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-09-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.09.29.26364287</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Six recommendations for improving care and support in advanced COPD: evidenced from a population-based, mixed method, multiple-perspective, longitudinal study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-09-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.24.26363855v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
The Context of Recovery Among Adults Who Recover from Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Post-COVID Condition Following Mind-Body Approaches: A Qualitative Descriptive Study Protocol 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.24.26363855v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
BackgroundMyalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) and post-COVID condition are complex, debilitating illnesses characterized by persistent fatigue and post-exertional malaise. Recovery is uncommon without targeted intervention; however, emerging clinical reports suggest that a subset of patients experience full resolution of symptoms after engaging in mind-body approaches. Patient perspectives on these interventions are divided, and qualitative evidence exploring successful recovery pathways is rare. This protocol outlines a study to investigate the contextual factors and patient-constructed explanations surrounding full recovery from ME/CFS or post-COVID condition using mind-body approaches.

Methods and analysisWe will employ a qualitative descriptive design rooted in a constructivist paradigm. Purposive and snowball sampling will be used to recruit approximately 20 adults from established infection-associated fatigue networks who self-report full recovery (lasting three months or more) from ME/CFS or post-COVID condition following a mind-body approach. Data will be collected through semi-structured interviews conducted via Zoom, and investigator reflexivity will be reported. Demographic information, including comorbidities, will be documented to contextualize the sample. Data will be analyzed inductively using reflexive thematic analysis. To ensure research rigor and reporting transparency, the study will adhere to the 15-point checklist of criteria for good thematic analysis proposed by Braun and Clarke.

DisseminationWe will publish our findings in a peer-reviewed, open-access journal and present at relevant academic conferences. A lay summary of the results will also be shared directly with participating patient recovery networks.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Cordovani, L., Almazyad, L., Zeraatkar, D., Busse, J. W. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-09-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.09.24.26363855</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Context of Recovery Among Adults Who Recover from Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Post-COVID Condition Following Mind-Body Approaches: A Qualitative Descriptive Study Protocol]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-09-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.23.26363767v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
EasyCog: a fast and effective numerical tool for the self-assessment of cognitive functions 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.23.26363767v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
Many pathological conditions, including chronic pain (CP), can impair cognitive functions. These functions are essential for adapting and evolving in concordance with the environment, which are key processes for coping with CP. However, in CP centers, cognitive assessment is rarely included in CP patient follow-up due to a lack of time, appropriate tools, or trained health professionals. To fill this gap, our team developed EasyCog, a digital tool that enables rapid self-assessment of cognitive functions. It enables cognitive evaluation without an experimenters help, thanks to speech recognition powered by an artificial neural network. In the initial validation steps, we established normative values for 7 cognitive functions on a cohort of 76 healthy subjects. Because EasyCog includes tests comparable to the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), we assessed its reliability against available normative values. To assess its specificity, we compared data from healthy subjects with 15 subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and 15 age-matched CP patients selected from a medical center. Finally, we tested EasyCogs test-retest reliability by repeating sessions at different time intervals. EasyCog showed excellent sensitivity to age-related decline, similar to MoCA normative values. Several cognitive functions were significantly and differentially impaired in MCI subjects and CP patients compared to normative values in healthy subjects, confirming good specificity. Finally, test-retest analysis showed no effect at a 4-month interval. In conclusion, EasyCog appears to be a convenient and reliable numeric tool for rapidly assessing and monitoring cognitive functions in patients.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Hadri, L., Lejczak, S., Fabian, X., Martinie, O., Justin, G., Lithfous, S., Salvat, E., Nizard, J., Poisbeau, P. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-09-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.09.23.26363767</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[EasyCog: a fast and effective numerical tool for the self-assessment of cognitive functions]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-09-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.10.28.25336335v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Healthcare Worker s (HCWs) Knowledge and Attitudes Related to Pain Management in a Lebanese Tertiary Hospital 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.10.28.25336335v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
OBJECTIVEThis study aims to evaluate the knowledge and attitudes of healthcare workers (HCWs) regarding pain assessment and management at a tertiary medical centre in Beirut, Lebanon as well as to identify areas for improvement.

DESIGNA cross-sectional study was conducted with Healthcare Workers using the "Knowledge and Attitudes Survey Regarding Pain" (KASRP), a validated practice-based questionnaire. This specific tool was used to assess the participants knowledge and attitudes related to pain management. Descriptive statistics were presented as frequencies, percentages, means, and standard deviations. Independent samples t-tests or ANOVA tests were used to compare mean knowledge scores between groups. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

SETTINGThe study was conducted over a period of 1 month at a private tertiary hospital in Beirut, Lebanon.

PARTICIPANTSThe study included physicians, nurses, and pharmacists working in different departments within the hospital: Internal Medicine, Pharmacy, Nursing, and Quality Management.

RESULTSA total of 161 HCWs participated in the study (41 physicians, 100 nurses, and 20 pharmacists). The overall mean KASRP score obtained across all participants was 13.65 (SD = 9.93) for correct responses, indicating a moderate level of knowledge. Only 9 participants (5.6%) scored [&ge;]80%, which is considered as a satisfactory level of knowledge and attitude: 4 doctors (9.8%), 5 nurses (5%), and no pharmacists. Items of the KASPR score were categorized into 5 domains: assessment, medication, addiction, spiritual considerations and interventions. Variables potentially affecting knowledge and attitude towards pain management were analyzed: gender, age, profession, prior training on pain management, and years of experience. There was no statistical significance in the mean score of correct answers based on gender, prior training, or years of experience (p >0.05). However, age and profession showed a statistical significance of impact on the mean score of correct answers among HCWs (P <0.05), suggesting that these factors may influence pain management understanding among HCWs

CONCLUSIONThe findings highlight gaps in knowledge and attitudes toward pain management among HCWs. Structured education and training programs on pain management are deemed necessary to enhance the knowledge and attitudes of HCWs for better patient outcomes.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THIS TOPICPain is an undertreated clinical symptom and health burden affecting both hospitalized and non-hospitalized patients. Although pain has been designated as the 5th vital sign to ensure pain assessment and management, many patients continue to have uncontrolled or inadequate management of pain (1)(2). This negatively impacts the patients quality of life and overall wellbeing (2). A lack of adequate knowledge among HCWs remains a significant barrier to effective pain management (12), with misconceptions about pain evaluation; incorrect beliefs that patients overstate their pain; fears about drug tolerance and addiction; a lack of understanding of analgesic pharmacology; and difficulties in assessing pain in children (13).

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDSTo date, there are no published studies that assessed the knowledge and attitudes of physicians, nurses, and pharmacists toward pain management in Lebanon. Conducting such research is essential to identify discipline-specific gaps and inform strategies to improve pain management knowledge and clinical practice among physicians, nurses, and pharmacists alike.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Kassem, M., Bakri, C., Zeinab, N., Hindi, N., Samra, S. A., Jalabi, Z., Hammoud, A. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-11-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.1101/2025.10.28.25336335</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Healthcare Worker s (HCWs) Knowledge and Attitudes Related to Pain Management in a Lebanese Tertiary Hospital]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.22.26358710v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Assessing Pain Catastrophizing Through Free-Text Responses: A Validation of Large Language Models 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.22.26358710v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
Validated measures of pain catastrophizing primarily assess catastrophizing as a stable trait. However, emerging evidence suggests catastrophizing fluctuates with context, highlighting a need for ecologically valid methods to capture it. This study evaluated large language models (LLMs) as implicit markers of catastrophizing from free-text responses from ninety-one adults with chronic pain receiving long-term opioid therapy (57.3% Female; mean age = 60.5 years). Patients completed baseline measures, including the trait pain catastrophizing scale (PCS), followed by a 10-minute writing task after random assignment to a negative, positive, or neutral pain-coping condition. State affect and pain were assessed before and after writing tasks and again after a cold pressor task (4{o}C; [&le;] 2 minutes). A state PCS followed the cold pressor task. Free-text responses were analyzed using four LLMs (Claude Opus 4; GPT Mini 4o; Llama 4 Maverick; and Gemini 2.5 Pro). ANOVA-based results supported discriminant validity, as all four LLM-derived pain catastrophizing scores differentiated negative from positive and neutral pain-coping conditions. Convergent validity was model-dependent; only Gemini-derived scores correlated with state catastrophizing (r = .22) and pain unpleasantness (r = .23). Divergent validity was mixed. LLM-derived scores were unrelated to pain intensity, but Gemini and Claude-derived scores showed small correlations with trait PCS (rs = .21; 28, respectively). All LLM-derived scores also correlated with negative affect (rs = .29-.41), comparable in magnitude to state PCS, suggesting limited specificity. These findings provide preliminary evidence that certain LLMs may serve as implicit markers of state pain catastrophizing, but further study is needed.

SummaryLeading Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate discriminant validity but mixed convergent and divergent validity scoring pain catastrophizing from persons living with chronic pain free-text responses.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Lee, A., You, D. S., Dildine, T. C. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-07-27</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.07.22.26358710</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Assessing Pain Catastrophizing Through Free-Text Responses: A Validation of Large Language Models]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-07-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.24.26358500v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Development and Psychometric Validation of the Pelvic Dystonia Severity Scale (PDSS) 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.24.26358500v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
BackgroundChronic pelvic pain with involuntary pelvic-floor hypertonicity is common, disabling, and inconsistently measured, and no validated condition-specific severity instrument exists. A refractory subset has been proposed to represent a focal dystonia of the pelvic musculature, termed pelvic dystonia.

PurposeTo develop the Pelvic Dystonia Severity Scale (PDSS) and evaluate its measurement properties as a patient-reported measure of pelvic-pain symptom severity and burden, following the COSMIN guidelines.

MethodsCross-sectional study with a test-retest component in 102 adults from an outpatient multidisciplinary pain practice. We assessed data quality, structural validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, measurement error, and construct validity against the Global Dystonia Severity Rating Scale (GDS) and Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). Because no validated diagnostic criteria exist, a clinician blinded to PDSS responses rated each participant for clinical signs of pelvic dystonia (present/possible/absent) as a provisional reference standard.

Results100 of 102 participants (98%) returned complete data, with 0% item-level missing data. Factor analysis supported a unidimensional structure (single factor, 68.6% of variance; loadings 0.56-0.93), with high subscale intercorrelations (r = 0.81-0.97). Internal consistency (Cronbachs  0.810-0.924) and test-retest reliability (ICC 0.857-0.953) were strong. Convergent validity was supported by correlations with GDS pelvic-region items (r = 0.56-0.68) and BPI severity (r = 0.44-0.55), and discriminant validity by weak correlations with anatomically remote regions (shoulder/arm r = 0.03-0.16). PDSS scores rose monotonically across blinded clinical-signs categories (absent 14.9, possible 32.7, present 52.0; Kruskal-Wallis p < 0.001), discriminating signs-present from signs-absent participants with a very large effect (Hedges g = 2.19; ROC AUC = 0.92).

ConclusionThe PDSS is a psychometrically robust, unidimensional measure of pelvic-pain symptom severity and burden with strong data quality, reliability, and construct validity. It is suitable for characterizing symptom severity and, pending responsiveness testing, for monitoring treatment. The dystonia interpretation of the underlying phenotype is discussed as a hypothesis for future neurophysiologic and longitudinal study.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Siefferman, J., Safroshkina, M., Nazarova, I., Zaznaev, A., Hasan, S. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-07-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.07.24.26358500</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development and Psychometric Validation of the Pelvic Dystonia Severity Scale (PDSS)]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-07-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.31.26359372v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Pain-Reporting Variability and Reliability as Predictors of Placebo Effects: A Cross-Sectional Experimental Pain Study 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.31.26359372v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
Placebo analgesia varies substantially across individuals, yet the sources of this heterogeneity remain incompletely understood. Pain-reporting variability may represent an underrecognized predictor of placebo responsiveness. This study examined whether variability and reliability of pain reporting predict placebo analgesia in an experimental pain setting.

Eight hundred and three participants (401 individuals with temporomandibular disorder and 400 healthy controls) completed a standardized thermal pain paradigm involving calibration, placebo conditioning, and testing phases. We obtained repeated heat temperatures (four) during thermal calibration and pain ratings during conditioning test (24 trials). We used these measurements to quantify within-person pain-reporting variability using standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CoV), and reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Placebo analgesia was calculated as the difference in pain ratings between control and placebo cue trials during testing. Regression models examined associations between reporter characteristics and placebo analgesia controlling for age, sex, race and experimenters.

Variability of thermal pain responses during calibration did not predict placebo analgesia. Greater pain-reporting variability during conditioning was associated with reduced placebo analgesia (higher SD and CoV), and this effect was mediated by slower acquisition of the cue- pain contingency. Conditioning-phase reliability was not associated with placebo analgesia, whereas three clusters of learning profiles predicted placebo effects. Thus, individual differences in pain-reporting variability during conditioning, rather than baseline sensory variability, contribute to heterogeneity in placebo analgesia. These findings suggest that variability during acquisition processing matters more than general sensory variability influencing the magnitude of placebo effects.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Cottam, J. A., Wang, Y., Akintola, T., Farrar, J., Chen, C., McArdle, P., Ament, S. A., Corlett, P., Dorsey, S. G., Treister, R., Colloca, L. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-08-05</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.07.31.26359372</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pain-Reporting Variability and Reliability as Predictors of Placebo Effects: A Cross-Sectional Experimental Pain Study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-08-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.24.26357716v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Analgesic Efficacy of Native Himalayan Shilajit as Add-On Therapy in Myofascial Pain Syndrome: An Exploratory Pilot Clinical Trial 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.24.26357716v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
BACKGROUNDMyofascial Pain Syndrome (MPS) is a common musculoskeletal pain condition associated with myofascial trigger points that has been reported to occur in 30-93% of patients who present with musculoskeletal pain. The current pharmacologic treatments (such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs], muscle relaxants, and tricyclic antidepressants) are only partially effective and have side effects. Shilajit, a mineral-organic exudate from the Himalayas, has antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, mitochondrial bioenergetic, and central analgesic effects and has not previously been examined as an analgesic in any musculoskeletal pain condition.

METHODSThis was an exploratory pilot clinical trial with open-label design in a single arm for an 18-month period at All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Rishikesh, India. Patients aged 18 to 65 years with clinically diagnosed MPS (Simons et al. 1999 criteria) and a baseline visual analog scale (VAS) score >4 were enrolled. Native Himalayan Shilajit 250 mg daily was administered as add-on therapy for 49 days. The main outcome was the percentage of participants with [&ge;]30% VAS reduction at Day 49. The intensity of pain, the dose of analgesics consumed and the number of trigger points were evaluated at five time points (Day 0, 12, 24, 36, 49). Throughout, adverse events were monitored.

RESULTSOf 80 enrolled participants, 76 (95.0%) completed the per-protocol analysis. Mean age was 41.25 {+/-} 9.05 years; 52.6% were male. A total of 56 of 76 participants (73.7%; 95% CI: 62.1- 82.8%) achieved the primary endpoint. Mean VAS score declined from 6.63 {+/-} 1.08 at baseline to.63 {+/-} 1.72 at Day 49 (mean reduction 45.3%; Friedman {chi}2 = 278.5, p<0.001). The first signs of pain reduction were seen at Day 24. The number of analgesic doses consumed decreased by 75.5% during the study period ({chi}2 = 126.1, p<0.001). There was a significant reduction in trigger point count from baseline to Day 49 (p=0.031) of 23.4%. One Grade 2 adverse event (gastrointestinal irritation, Day 28, resolved within 24 hours, no drug discontinuation) occurred; no serious adverse events were reported. Trial registration: CTRI/2025/06/088636. The study was not funded by any external sources.

CONCLUSIONSNative Himalayan Shilajit 250 mg/day for 49 days was associated with clinically and statistically significant reductions in pain intensity, analgesic consumption, and trigger-point burden in patients with MPS, with a favorable safety profile. These findings warrant confirmation in a larger, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Basavaraja, D., Kant, R., Pai, V. S., Yadav, R., Chikara, G., Tomar, S., Sircar, D., Sambhaji, K. R., Panda, P. K. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-08-05</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.07.24.26357716</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Analgesic Efficacy of Native Himalayan Shilajit as Add-On Therapy in Myofascial Pain Syndrome: An Exploratory Pilot Clinical Trial]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-08-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.03.26359604v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Multidimensional symptom burden across sleep, pain, affect, cognition and energy: cross-sectional associations with chronic pain interference and work disability in UK Biobank 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.03.26359604v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
BackgroundSleep, pain, affect, cognition and energy (SPACE) has been described as a latent symptom-severity construct in chronic overlapping pain conditions. Its population-level structure and associations with chronic pain interference and functional disability remain uncertain.

MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional analysis of UK Biobank participants aged [&ge;]40 years. Prespecified standardised symptom domains were examined using correlation analysis, principal component analysis, exploratory factor analysis and k-means clustering. Associations with chronic pain interference, current work disability, poor self-rated health and longstanding illness or disability were assessed using covariate-adjusted logistic regression. A four-domain score excluding pain tested whether associations extended beyond the pain domain. Secondary analyses examined convergence with actigraphy, biomarkers, polygenic risk scores and brain magnetic resonance imaging phenotypes.

ResultsOf 501,935 eligible participants, 475,134 had complete domain data. Domains were modestly intercorrelated (r=0.04-0.46). Clustering identified lower- and higher-burden phenotypes comprising 70.5% and 29.5% of participants; current work disability occurred in 1.3% and 10.3%, respectively. Adding the four non-pain domains increased the area under the curve for chronic pain interference from 0.593 to 0.672 and for work disability from 0.748 to 0.850. Inclusion of pain increased the work-disability area under the curve to 0.863. Multimodal measures added smaller increments.

ConclusionsA multidimensional symptom profile was identifiable at population scale and was concurrently associated with chronic pain interference and work disability, with non-pain domains contributing information beyond pain burden alone.

SignificanceChronic pain interference and work disability were associated with a broader multidimensional symptom burden spanning sleep, affect, cognition and energy, rather than pain alone. In a large population cohort, the non-pain domains added substantial concurrent discriminatory information. These findings support multidimensional assessment of functionally impairing pain and justify prospective evaluation of whether symptom-system profiles predict incident disability, healthcare use, recovery trajectories or treatment response.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Ciechanowicz, S., Li, K., Ma, D. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-08-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.08.03.26359604</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Multidimensional symptom burden across sleep, pain, affect, cognition and energy: cross-sectional associations with chronic pain interference and work disability in UK Biobank]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-08-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.04.26359660v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Biobehavioral pain profiling of minoritized adults with chronic widespread pain and clinical obesity before and after bariatric surgery: study protocol for a longitudinal, observational cohort study 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.04.26359660v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
Chronic widespread pain (CWP) is highly prevalent among minoritized adults with clinical obesity, and symptom management is challenging. Weight loss via bariatric surgery is often recommended to improve musculoskeletal pain. However, there is significant variation in pain trajectories following bariatric surgery, and the impact of weight loss on movement-evoked pain is largely unknown. The current study aims to systematically characterize and quantify longitudinal changes in pain at rest and movement-evoked pain up to 6 months post-surgery, and to determine whether pain modulatory mechanisms, joint motion, and mechanical loading biosignatures mediate the relationship between weight loss and pain change. This study protocol details the research methodologies and procedures for a prospective observational cohort study of 60 individuals undergoing bariatric surgery for weight loss. Participants will complete questionnaires, anthropometric measurements, clinical and experimental pain testing, functional testing, and a standardized movement testing battery to assess joint motion and mechanical loading using camera-based motion capture before and at 3 and 6 months post- bariatric surgery. Generalized linear mixed models to assess the significance of changes in PAR, MEP, and all patient-reported outcome measures. Reduced models will treat the main effect of time as a fixed factor, and intra-individual repeated measures as random effects. Ethics and dissemination: This study protocol has been registered as an observational study with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT0675386), version #1, in the United States and has been approved by the NYU Langone Health Institutional Review Board (IRB#: i21-01652) and the New York City Health + Hospitals/Bellevue Research Office (Bellevue Study ID #: STUDY00003739). Study results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences and community events.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Merriwether, E. N., Maqsood, M., Vanegas, S. M., Em, S., Perez, N., Parikh, M., Ruiz-Guerenabarrena, B., Humala-Martinez, C., Lopez, B., Fillingim, R. B., Jay, M. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-08-08</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.08.04.26359660</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Biobehavioral pain profiling of minoritized adults with chronic widespread pain and clinical obesity before and after bariatric surgery: study protocol for a longitudinal, observational cohort study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-08-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.05.26359702v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Neural Alterations in Chronic Pain: MRI Analysis 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.05.26359702v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
BackgroundChronic pain affects hundreds of millions worldwide and remains a major clinical challenge, despite numerous available treatments. Advances in brain imaging offer a promising path toward identifying neural signatures of chronic pain, potentially enhancing diagnosis and guiding treatment. However, while a core set of brain regions, including the insula, cingulate, and somatosensory cortices, has been repeatedly implicated, findings regarding other regions and connectivity patterns involved remain inconsistent, with limited robust replication.

ObjectiveTo address these gaps, the present work characterizes resting-state functional connectivity and gray matter volume differences between chronic pain patients and pain-free controls.

MethodsIn this secondary analysis of publicly available data, anatomical and resting-state functional MRI were analyzed from 56 patients with chronic knee pain due to osteoarthritis and 20 pain-free controls. Group comparisons used Network-Based Statistic (NBS) and Bayesian multivariate regression models, controlling for demographic covariates.

ResultsIn the pain group, about 75% of parcellated brain regions exhibited increased functional connectivity compared to controls. The 30 highest degree centrality regions in the NBS network were concentrated in regions consistent with prior pain neuroimaging findings. Additionally, chronic pain patients exhibited reduced gray matter volume (-3.98%; SD 1.2%) across 33% of parcellated brain regions, including key regions implicated in pain processing.

ConclusionsThese findings demonstrate widespread functional and anatomical neural alterations in chronic pain, revealing a global pattern of reorganization extending beyond previously reported network-pair effects. Characterizing such alterations may contribute to ongoing efforts to identify neuroimaging markers of chronic pain, with potential translational relevance.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Cohen-Blum, L., Eizman, S., Tetreault, P., Duek, O. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-08-10</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.08.05.26359702</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Neural Alterations in Chronic Pain: MRI Analysis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-08-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.07.26359966v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Relevance Based Prediction: A Transparent, Non-Artificial Intelligence, Mathematical Solution to Personalized Opioid Treatment 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.07.26359966v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
Accurate prediction of individual medical outcomes is essential for optimizing treatment allocation amid rising costs, coverage denials, and limited clinical resources. Traditional predictive models, including regression and neural networks, rely on average effects and cannot tailor predictions to the specific circumstances of individual cases. We present relevance-based prediction (RBP), a model-free method that predicts outcomes as weighted averages of observed cases, with weights determined by a rigorously defined measure of relevance. Unlike model-based methods that rely on fixed calibrated parameters, RBP revisits the original data for each prediction and customizes both the cases and variables used. Applied to opioid treatment, RBP provides case-specific insights unavailable from conventional models, including how each prior case informs a prediction, how each variable affects its reliability and value, and how reliable the prediction is before it is made. These individualized insights may prevent misleading average-based decisions and reduce harmful or suboptimal treatment.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Robinson, C. L., Turkington, D., Lee, L., Kritzman, M., Yong, R. J. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-08-11</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.08.07.26359966</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Relevance Based Prediction: A Transparent, Non-Artificial Intelligence, Mathematical Solution to Personalized Opioid Treatment]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-08-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.07.26359945v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Targeted Pulsed Radio Frequency (PRF) Stimulation in the Management of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.07.26359945v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical efficacy of non-invasive electrical pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) stimulation on diagnostic thresholds and subjective pain in chronic, pedal diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN).

MethodsA randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT07725419) enrolled 92 patients with pedal DPN naive to PRF and scoring [&ge;] 4/10 on the Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) test. Participants received either active PRF stimulation (n = 46) or a non-stimulating placebo (n = 46) applied bilaterally to the sciatic nerve in the popliteal fossa for 10 minutes per limb, once weekly for three weeks. The primary outcome was clinical neuropathic resolution (DN4 < 4). Secondary outcomes included subjective pain tracking via the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst Pain scale over a 6-month follow-up window.

Missing data were handled via Non-Responder Imputation (NRI). Longitudinal continuous trajectories were modeled using Linear Mixed-Effects Models (LMMs) adjusted for age, gender, and baseline medication use.

ResultsIn the Intention-to-Treat population (N = 92), a significant diagnostic responder effect occurred at 3 months, with 39.1% of active patients dropping below the diagnostic threshold for neuropathy (DN4 < 4) versus 19.6% of placebo controls (p = 0.039). For subjective pain, 47.7% of active patients achieved a Minimally Clinically Important Difference ([&ge;] 3-point reduction) in BPI Worst Pain at 1 month compared to 19.4% of placebo controls (p = 0.008). Multivariable logistic regression identified active treatment as a significant independent predictor of clinical response (Adjusted OR = 4.86; 95% CI: 1.56 to 17.53; p = 0.010). Continuous LMM tracking confirmed a statistically significant treatment-by-timepoint interaction for BPI Worst Pain at 1 month (p = 0.046).

ConclusionA brief, three-week course of non-invasive PRF stimulation serves as a safe, effective, non-pharmacological adjunct that aids in managing the diagnostic presentation of neuropathic pain and mitigates worst pain experiences in patients suffering from pedal DPN.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Linde, L. D., Berger, P. P., Landau, S. S., Libhaber, E., Potgieter, P., van Blerk, P., Birkill, C. F. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-08-13</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.08.07.26359945</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Targeted Pulsed Radio Frequency (PRF) Stimulation in the Management of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-08-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.14.26360457v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Pain and Pain Sensitivity Assessments in the Acute to Chronic Pain Signatures (A2CPS) Program 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.14.26360457v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
The Acute to Chronic Pain Signatures (A2CPS) project is a large, multisite, longitudinal observational study designed to identify biomarkers that predict the transition from acute to chronic pain following surgery in more than 2200 patients. Two participant cohorts were recruited before undergoing either knee arthroplasty or thoracic surgery. A unique feature of this study is its comprehensive evaluation of pain, including evoked and recall pain measures collected at baseline, 6-weeks, and 3-months following surgery, in addition to the primary pain outcome assessed remotely at 6 months. This paper describes the acquisition, quality control procedures, and available pain and pain sensitivity variables included in the A2CPS study. Self-report pain assessments include surgical site (i.e., index) pain intensity, pain interference and quality, spatial distribution of pain using body maps, and pain-related dysfunction specific to each cohort. Quantitative sensory testing yielded evoked pain sensitivity data including pressure pain thresholds, temporal summation of pain, dynamic mechanical allodynia, and conditioned pain modulation at both index and common sites across cohorts. Movement-evoked pain was assessed for each cohort using relevant functional tasks (knee: 10m walk and five-time-sit-to-stand tests, thoracic: deep breathing and coughing). Using baseline data from release v2.1.0, comprising approximately 1,400 participants, we evaluated interrelationships among pain variables. Overall, the A2CPS pain and pain sensitivity data provide a robust, comprehensive set of variables that supports the studys goal of uncovering predictive biomarkers of post-operative chronic pain and enables broader exploration relative to other study outcomes, including imaging, psychosocial, and "omics" data.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Frey-Law, L. A., Berardi, G., Ansari, B., Liu, Y., Satpathy-Horton, B., Sluka, K. A., Vance, C. G., Dailey, D. L., McCarthy, R. J., Wager, T. D., Lindquist, M. A., Harte, S. E., the A2CPS Consortium ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-08-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.08.14.26360457</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pain and Pain Sensitivity Assessments in the Acute to Chronic Pain Signatures (A2CPS) Program]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-08-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.13.26360409v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Pain on the Street: Implementation of a Field-Based Pain Response for People Experiencing Homelessness 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.13.26360409v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
2.BackgroundHomeless individuals are disproportionately affected by limited access to primary care and pain management services. While community-based organizations frequently conduct outreach, few have ethical, standardized, or replicable methods for assessing pain and distributing referrals in field settings. Existing models range from passive, meals-only outreach, to costly mobile clinics with limited reach. This leaves a critical gap that a low-resource, agile framework is designed to address.

ObjectiveThe aim of this quality-improvement initiative was to implement and iteratively refine a standardized, field-based pain assessment and response pathway for adults experiencing homelessness and to evaluate its feasibility, fidelity, safety, and operational barriers during routine outreach.

MethodsA cross-sectional quality improvement needs assessment was conducted during homeless outreach activities in San Francisco and Sacramento using convenience sampling. The intervention framework incorporated volunteer training, cognitive capacity screening, verbal informed consent, vital sign collection, and predefined criteria for emergency escalation. Participants were unsheltered adults with adequate decisional capacity to provide voluntary informed consent.

ResultsThe dataset included 193 encounters, with valid pain scores for 175 participants. Mean pain was 3.79 {+/-} 2.78, with a median of 3. Cold packs were used for acute discomfort and foot or ankle pain, while hot packs were used for joint pain. Some participants declined comfort measures. No supply shortages, referral confusion, or emergency-escalation delays were documented. Telephone access remained a barrier to referral completion.

ConclusionThis framework demonstrates a replicable and ethically grounded model for field-based pain assessment and referral during homeless outreach. The pathway was feasible and safe to implement, expanded care options beyond default emergency-department referral by directing stable nonemergent pain toward primary care, and identified limited telephone access as a major barrier to completing follow-up.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Valliant, S. J., Joseph, M., Sharma, M. S., Durosinmi, G. P., Fitts, D., Tran, S., Gonzalez, A. N., Kothari, S., Anderson, T., Ralh, R., Lee, A. K., Parton, S. S., Shirinzada, F., Kulik, C. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-08-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.08.13.26360409</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pain on the Street: Implementation of a Field-Based Pain Response for People Experiencing Homelessness]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-08-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2025.12.05.25341696v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Peripheral magnetic stimulation of the upper-limb nerves: evoked sensations, phantom-pain relief, and cortical responses 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2025.12.05.25341696v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
Withdrawal StatementThe authors have decided to withdraw this manuscript following a re-evaluation of the statistical analysis, which led to a revised calculation approach and slightly different results. Therefore, the authors do not wish this work to be cited as reference for the project. If you have any questions, please contact the corresponding author.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Grigoreva, O. A., Samsonov, T. S., Dolgoarshinnaia, A., Lebedev, M. A., Soghoyan, G. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-08-21</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2025.12.05.25341696</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Peripheral magnetic stimulation of the upper-limb nerves: evoked sensations, phantom-pain relief, and cortical responses]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-08-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.20.26360943v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Longitudinal Characterization of Nociplasticity in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Nationwide Registry Study 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.20.26360943v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
BackgroundNociplasticity is common in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), yet its longitudinal trajectory remain poorly characterized.

MethodsPatients with SLE in the FORWARD Databank were classified as Minimal, Type 1, Type 2, or Mixed using the Polysymptomatic Distress Scale (PSD[&ge;]8) and the Systemic Lupus Activity Questionnaire (SLAQ) inflammatory domain score ([&ge;]2). Cross-sectional analyses (N=372) compared pain, function, disability, depression, organ damage, and medication use. Longitudinal analyses (n=301; median 3.7 years) characterized phenotype transitions using continuous-time Markov models and identified latent trajectory subgroups using joint group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM).

FindingsAt baseline, 29% were Minimal, 12% Type 1, 13% Type 2, and 47% Mixed. Functional impairment increased stepwise: SF-36 PCS worsened from 49.7 in Minimal to 30.0 in Mixed; PROMIS Pain Interference from 46.2 to 63.6 (both p<0.001). BILD organ damage was highest in Mixed (3.9 vs 2.6-2.9; p<0.001). Depression rose from 3% to 43% and opioid use reached 44% in Mixed. Longitudinally, Minimal and Mixed were persistent (mean duration 2.0 and 1.8 years; one-year retention 70%), while Type 1 and Type 2 were transient ([~]0.5 years; retention 18% and 28%). Exit trajectories were asymmetric: Type 1 moved preferentially to Minimal (49% of exits), whereas Type 2 moved to Mixed (65%; p<0.001). Population-average PSD was nearly flat (+0.014 SD/year, p=0.07); opioid use declined to near zero in Minimal and Type 1 but remained high in Type 2 and Mixed. Joint GBTM identified four severity classes along a Minimal-to-Mixed diagonal, indicating that the two axes scale together longitudinally and that pure Type 1 and Type 2 are transient.

InterpretationNociplastic phenotypes in SLE are persistent, severity-stratified, and associated with functional impairment, depression, cumulative damage, and sustained opioid burden. Type 1 and Type 2 are transient states with divergent exits: the former resolving, the latter progressing.

FundingLupus Research Alliance

Research in contextO_ST_ABSEvidence before this studyC_ST_ABSThe Type 1 and Type 2 systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) framework distinguishes inflammatory manifestations from symptoms associated with nociplastic pain and has provided a clinically meaningful approach to understanding the heterogeneity of SLE. Patient-reported instruments, including the polysymptomatic distress (PSD) scale combined with inflammatory symptom assessment, have enabled classification of these phenotypes in both research and clinical settings. A search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science (from database inception to June 01, 2026) using the terms "systemic lupus erythematosus", "Type 1 SLE", "Type 2 SLE", "nociplastic pain", "nociplasticity", "polysymptomatic distress", "trajectory", and "transition", together with screening of reference lists of relevant articles, identified studies describing cross-sectional phenotype distributions, intermittent and persistent Type 2 symptoms, and molecular differences between phenotypes. However, whether Type 1 and Type 2 phenotypes represent stable disease states or transient manifestations of a patients underlying longitudinal symptom trajectory is unknown.

Added value of this studyThis study analyzed prospectively collected patient-reported data from 301 SLE patients enrolled in the nationwide FORWARD registry over a median follow-up of 3.7 years to characterize the longitudinal behavior of Type 1 and Type 2 phenotypes. By combining continuous-time Markov modelling with group-based trajectory modelling, we distinguished threshold-defined phenotype transitions from underlying symptom trajectories. We found that Minimal and Mixed phenotypes were highly stable over time, whereas Type 1 and Type 2 phenotypes represented transient states with distinct transition patterns. Data-driven trajectories formed a stable severity continuum from Minimal to Mixed rather than persistent Type 1 and Type 2 classes. Higher nociplastic burden was also associated with sustained impairment in physical function, depression, medication burden, and opioid use.

Implication of all the available evidenceThese findings suggest that nociplastic symptom burden represents a persistent and clinically important component of SLE that is not fully captured by inflammatory disease activity alone. Routine assessment of nociplastic symptoms alongside inflammatory activity could improve longitudinal patient stratification and identify individuals who may benefit from combined immunomodulatory and symptom-directed management. Future studies should determine whether phenotype-informed treatment strategies improve long-term patient outcomes.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Huang, C.-Y., Tanguay-Sabourin, C., Liu, Y., Pedro, S., Dildine, T. C., Bozkurt, S., Katz, P., Michaud, K., Falasinnu, T. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-08-27</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.08.20.26360943</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Longitudinal Characterization of Nociplasticity in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Nationwide Registry Study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-08-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.26.26359760v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Pain state-dependent multimodal assessment in non-specific low back pain: a pseudorandomized study design with implementation insights 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.26.26359760v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
BackgroundFluctuations in pain intensity are intrinsic to non-specific chronic low back pain (nsCLBP). Nevertheless, pain fluctuations have rarely been considered when investigating pathophysiological mechanisms. Therefore, a novel study protocol was developed and implemented to systematically assess the impact of fluctuating pain states on pain-related measures.

MethodsThe final study cohort consisted of 45 nsCLBP patients and 47 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HCs). Patients participated in three visits, conducted during different pain states (i.e. clinically relevant pain, low-intensity clinical pain / pain-free, clinically irrelevant pain induced using a Qutenza 8% capsaicin patch). Pain fluctuations were monitored through online assessments every four days and guided the pseudorandomized visit scheduling. HCs participated in a single visit. Each study visit comprised a multimodal battery of pain-related measures.

Results93.33% of patients completed all three visit types in a pseudorandomized order ({chi}{superscript 2}=1.50, p=0.826). Visit scheduling was possible due to the high self-report adherence (median=93.48%), unrelated to self-report burden ({rho}=-0.097, p=0.53). Study visits were conducted during different pain states, as indicated by: i) the significantly higher low back pain intensity in the clinically relevant pain visit (mean[SD]: 3.98[0.90]), compared to the low-intensity clinical pain (1.03[0.86]) and clinically irrelevant pain (1.13[0.82]) visits (p-values<0.001), as well as by ii) the successful induction of a moderate-to-high clinically irrelevant pain across assessments.

ConclusionDespite scheduling complexity and pain state transition uncertainty, a pain state-dependent pseudorandomized study design is feasible and could improve the understanding of nsCLBP mechanisms.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Chozas Barrientos, B., Hau, M., Sirucek, L., Langenfeld, A., Wehrli, M., Wirth, B., Zölch, N., Devan, J., Dudli, S., Schweinhardt, P. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-09-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.08.26.26359760</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pain state-dependent multimodal assessment in non-specific low back pain: a pseudorandomized study design with implementation insights]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-09-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.08.27.25334555v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Enhancing Palliative Care Registration Using an Automated Robotic Process with Clinician Validation: A PRADA Prospective Cohort Study 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.08.27.25334555v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
BackgroundIneffective care planning at the end of life carries high rates of unscheduled hospitalisation and avoidable deaths in hospital. Palliative care registration (PCR) and crucially, care planning, helps improve adverse outcomes. However, identification for registration often occurs late or not at all.

AimTo improve PCR accuracy and uptake by developing an automated digital tool, utilising palliative care process markers, combined with clinical judgement, to identify those with palliative care needs.

Design and SettingA primary care based prospective cohort study in Wolverhampton.

MethodAll adults (n=39,079) were included. A robotic process tool (BOT) identified those not on the PCR using any of five palliative care process markers. BOT positive patients were assessed by GPs for the PCR. Performance metrics for prediction of subsequent 1 year mortality were determined.

Results546 patients were BOT positive. GPs added 131 patients (24%) to the PCR. This subset had the highest mortality rate (48.1%) compared to; those already on the PCR (37.2%), BOT positive patient who were not added to the PCR (19.5%) and those who were non-registered and BOT negative (0.8%) (p<0.001). The new combined PCR captured 220 (35.5%) of deaths, compared to 25.4% in the original PCR. A  digital safety net group, comprising those initially on the PCR and all BOT positive patients, accounted for 48.6% of deaths.

ConclusionWe developed a robotic process technique combined with GP assessment that yielded higher PCR uptake and accuracy, identifying individuals at-risk for ongoing surveillance.

How this fits inPalliative care registers support the delivery of good palliative care by ensuring those who may be nearing the end of life have an assessment of their needs and supported care planning. Previous tools to support identification for palliative care registration have relied on opportunistic identification. Many people who die expectedly are not included on registers. Our new method demonstrates an automated, electronic, data driven system incorporating clinician validation. This system improved the uptake and accuracy of palliative care registration.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Heyting, E., Singh, B., Klaire, V., Kumari, N., Ahmed, K., Burrell, J., Guest, E., Koodaruth, A., Labutale, P., Mahmood, K., Pickavance, G., Sidhu, M., Malhi, G., Parry, E. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-11-13</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.1101/2025.08.27.25334555</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Enhancing Palliative Care Registration Using an Automated Robotic Process with Clinician Validation: A PRADA Prospective Cohort Study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.11.10.25339944v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Factors associated with therapeutic complexity at the end of life: Analysis of a cohort of patients undergoing palliative care at home 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.11.10.25339944v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
Complexity at the end of life is the result of the interrelationship of all the patients needs at this stage. The Hexagon of Complexity (HexCom) enables a multi-dimensional approach to patients. The management of medication becomes a complex element for the patient/family member or caregiver.Determine the factors associated with therapeutic complexity according to the dimensions of needs determined with HexCom. Longitudinal observational study of a multicentre cohort. Therapeutic complexity was chosen as dependent variable. Independent variables: socio-demographic, relationship with the caregiver, pathologies and groups of advanced diseases, functional and mental status, six HexCom domains and diagnosis that most contributes to the death process. All these variables were assessed initially and the HexCom variables were also assessed after the patients death. A multivariate Poisson regression analysis was performed. The scope of the study is palliative home care in Catalonia. The cohort included 1,677 patients. Recruitment was performed by consecutive sampling. The results show a strong relationship of the initial therapeutic complexity with the difficulty in managing symptoms (OR 4.56), dying process (OR 2.62), and difficulties in handling information about the diagnosis/prognosis (OR 2.04), bad family relationships (OR 1.82) and difficulties in handling the patients basic needs (OR 1.87). Regarding the final therapeutic complexity, two new factors have been identified, which are the difficulty in adapting the therapeutic effort (OR 1.58) and the lack of external support (OR 0.60). This last factor is the only one which decreases therapeutic complexity as the factor increases. In order to effectively manage medication, support is needed in social, family and ethical areas, in order to reduce therapeutic complexity.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Mesquida, M. M., Busquet-Duran, X., Manresa, J. M., Cid, M. F., Basseda, R. M., Toran-Monserrat, P. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-11-15</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.1101/2025.11.10.25339944</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Factors associated with therapeutic complexity at the end of life: Analysis of a cohort of patients undergoing palliative care at home]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.11.10.25339944v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Factors associated with therapeutic complexity at the end of life: Analysis of a cohort of patients undergoing palliative care at home 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.11.10.25339944v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
Complexity at the end of life is the result of the interrelationship of all the patients needs at this stage. The Hexagon of Complexity (HexCom) enables a multi-dimensional approach to patients. The management of medication becomes a complex element for the patient/family member or caregiver.Determine the factors associated with therapeutic complexity according to the dimensions of needs determined with HexCom. Longitudinal observational study of a multicentre cohort. Therapeutic complexity was chosen as dependent variable. Independent variables: socio-demographic, relationship with the caregiver, pathologies and groups of advanced diseases, functional and mental status, six HexCom domains and diagnosis that most contributes to the death process. All these variables were assessed initially and the HexCom variables were also assessed after the patients death. A multivariate Poisson regression analysis was performed. The scope of the study is palliative home care in Catalonia. The cohort included 1,677 patients. Recruitment was performed by consecutive sampling. The results show a strong relationship of the initial therapeutic complexity with the difficulty in managing symptoms (OR 4.56), dying process (OR 2.62), and difficulties in handling information about the diagnosis/prognosis (OR 2.04), bad family relationships (OR 1.82) and difficulties in handling the patients basic needs (OR 1.87). Regarding the final therapeutic complexity, two new factors have been identified, which are the difficulty in adapting the therapeutic effort (OR 1.58) and the lack of external support (OR 0.60). This last factor is the only one which decreases therapeutic complexity as the factor increases. In order to effectively manage medication, support is needed in social, family and ethical areas, in order to reduce therapeutic complexity.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Mesquida, M. M., Busquet-Duran, X., Manresa, J. M., Cid, M. F., Basseda, R. M., Toran-Monserrat, P. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-11-15</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.1101/2025.11.10.25339944</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Factors associated with therapeutic complexity at the end of life: Analysis of a cohort of patients undergoing palliative care at home]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.11.17.25340426v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Understanding the Meaning of a Good Death for People living with Parkinsons Disease: Qualitative study 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.11.17.25340426v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
Background and ObjectivesParkinsons disease is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder globally. Despite its prevalence, the provision of Palliative Care for people living with Parkinsons disease (PLwPD) is often delayed or entirely absent. To date, no study has explored what constitutes a "good death", a central goal of palliative care, from the perspective of PLwPD themselves. We aimed to give voice to PLwPD on this topic through a qualitative approach.

MethodsIn this cross-sectional multicenter qualitative study, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 30 PLwPD selected through purposive sampling from four geriatric and neurology outpatient clinics between May 2021 and December 2022. An interdisciplinary team analyzed the transcripts using inductive thematic analysis. The process involved independent coding by three researchers, followed by iterative collaborative team discussions to refine and standardize the analysis, all grounded in a constructionist paradigm. To ensure methodological rigor, we employed techniques of triangulation, thick descriptions, and reflexivity.

ResultsThe sample was diverse in terms of race/ethnicity, gender, age (36-84 years), religious affiliation, educational background, and disease stage. We identified two major themes: Fears and Coping. Reported fears included experiencing disability, pain and discomfort, fear of feeling shame, fear of being a burden, fear of being abandoned and left helpless. Coping was a multidimensional theme, comprising the relational experience of feeling well cared for (defined by being valued, receiving clear and honest communication, and being treated with love and kindness) alongside the active strategies of finding opportunities for joy and drawing on religiosity and spirituality. Religiosity/spirituality appeared as a key factor in emotional regulation, fostering a sense of purpose and acceptance in the face of death.

DiscussionOur findings suggest that improving palliative care for PLwPD requires an approach that actively addresses specific fears and strengthens the multiple dimensions of coping, which includes fostering opportunities for joy, supporting spirituality, and enhancing the relational experience of feeling well cared for. This study illuminates often-overlooked aspects of care and provides a basis for the development of person-centered interventions aimed at preventing and alleviating suffering in this population.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Martins, L., Mikelyte, R., Carvalho, R. S., Ferraz, H. B., Oliveira, D., Vanelli, J. M., Tardelli, N. R., Fukushima, F. B., Oliveira Vidal, E. I. d. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-11-21</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.1101/2025.11.17.25340426</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Understanding the Meaning of a Good Death for People living with Parkinsons Disease: Qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.11.17.25340426v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Understanding the Meaning of a Good Death for People living with Parkinsons Disease: Qualitative study 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.11.17.25340426v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
Background and ObjectivesParkinsons disease is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder globally. Despite its prevalence, the provision of Palliative Care for people living with Parkinsons disease (PLwPD) is often delayed or entirely absent. To date, no study has explored what constitutes a "good death", a central goal of palliative care, from the perspective of PLwPD themselves. We aimed to give voice to PLwPD on this topic through a qualitative approach.

MethodsIn this cross-sectional multicenter qualitative study, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 30 PLwPD selected through purposive sampling from four geriatric and neurology outpatient clinics between May 2021 and December 2022. An interdisciplinary team analyzed the transcripts using inductive thematic analysis. The process involved independent coding by three researchers, followed by iterative collaborative team discussions to refine and standardize the analysis, all grounded in a constructionist paradigm. To ensure methodological rigor, we employed techniques of triangulation, thick descriptions, and reflexivity.

ResultsThe sample was diverse in terms of race/ethnicity, gender, age (36-84 years), religious affiliation, educational background, and disease stage. We identified two major themes: Fears and Coping. Reported fears included experiencing disability, pain and discomfort, fear of feeling shame, fear of being a burden, fear of being abandoned and left helpless. Coping was a multidimensional theme, comprising the relational experience of feeling well cared for (defined by being valued, receiving clear and honest communication, and being treated with love and kindness) alongside the active strategies of finding opportunities for joy and drawing on religiosity and spirituality. Religiosity/spirituality appeared as a key factor in emotional regulation, fostering a sense of purpose and acceptance in the face of death.

DiscussionOur findings suggest that improving palliative care for PLwPD requires an approach that actively addresses specific fears and strengthens the multiple dimensions of coping, which includes fostering opportunities for joy, supporting spirituality, and enhancing the relational experience of feeling well cared for. This study illuminates often-overlooked aspects of care and provides a basis for the development of person-centered interventions aimed at preventing and alleviating suffering in this population.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Martins, L., Mikelyte, R., Carvalho, R. S., Ferraz, H. B., Oliveira, D., Vanelli, J. M., Tardelli, N. R., Fukushima, F. B., Oliveira Vidal, E. I. d. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-11-21</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.1101/2025.11.17.25340426</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Understanding the Meaning of a Good Death for People living with Parkinsons Disease: Qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.01.02.26343333v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
'I need policymakers to listen: a stakeholder needs assessment concerning anticipatory injectable medication systems, using a novel qualitative survey 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.01.02.26343333v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
BackgroundAnticipatory injectable medications for symptom control are a key end-of-life care intervention. However, ensuring their safe and timely use in the community is a global challenge. The needs and priorities of stakeholders involved in processes for prescribing and administering these medications remain underexplored. We must understand these perspectives to design inclusive and adaptive systems.

AimTo identify the needs and priorities of key stakeholders involved in community-based systems for using anticipatory injectable medications.

DesignWe adopted a qualitative exploratory design, using an online survey between September and October 2024. Participants provided anonymised demographic information and completed up to four prompts capturing their stakeholder role, needs and priorities. Data were analysed using a combined inductive-deductive framework to produce synthesised shortlists of priorities and needs.

Setting/participantsUK-based professional and public participants were recruited through social media, professional networks, charities, and public engagement events.

ResultsIn total, 439 participants contributed 729 responses across various stakeholder groups. Findings revealed substantial diversity in stakeholder needs and priorities, both within and between groups. However, most stakeholder groups prioritised timely care, minimising of suffering, and wanted nationally consistent guidance for using injectable medications. Broader societal influences also shaped responses.

ConclusionsOur findings highlight wide diversity in priorities and needs between stakeholders for using anticipatory injectable medications in the community. We propose that inclusive system design should include comprehensive assessment of key stakeholders needs and priorities, with the aim of providing better care. Our study demonstrates that stakeholder needs assessment offers a valuable framework to achieve this.

What is already known about the topic?O_LIAnticipatory injectable medications are a widely used intervention in several countries to support timely end-of-life symptom control at home.
C_LIO_LIThere are ongoing challenges with delays, inconsistent access, and variations in prescribing and governance across regions, indicating that system design influences both timeliness and safety.
C_LIO_LIExisting research has primarily focused on the needs of individual professional groups, and no prior work has mapped the differing needs of all stakeholders involved in these systems.
C_LI

What this paper adds?O_LIOur study demonstrates that stakeholder groups have diverse needs but most share some core priorities -timely care, national consistency in practice guidance, and minimising suffering.
C_LIO_LIWider societal factors and concerns shape stakeholder expectations of end-of-life medication systems.
C_LIO_LIOur approach to stakeholder needs assessment reveals system requirements that consensus-based or single-perspective approaches often overlook.
C_LI

Implications for practice, theory, or policyO_LISystem improvements should be tailored to the specific needs of key stakeholder groups rather than assuming uniform priorities.
C_LIO_LIStrong cross-stakeholder support exists for national, practical guidance on anticipatory prescribing, equipment, training, and governance.
C_LIO_LIStakeholder needs assessment offers a useful method for designing safer, more responsive end-of-life medication systems.
C_LI
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Perera, B., Bowers, B. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-05</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.01.02.26343333</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA['I need policymakers to listen: a stakeholder needs assessment concerning anticipatory injectable medication systems, using a novel qualitative survey]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.01.02.26343333v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
'I need policymakers to listen: a stakeholder needs assessment concerning anticipatory injectable medication systems, using a novel qualitative survey 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.01.02.26343333v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
BackgroundAnticipatory injectable medications for symptom control are a key end-of-life care intervention. However, ensuring their safe and timely use in the community is a global challenge. The needs and priorities of stakeholders involved in processes for prescribing and administering these medications remain underexplored. We must understand these perspectives to design inclusive and adaptive systems.

AimTo identify the needs and priorities of key stakeholders involved in community-based systems for using anticipatory injectable medications.

DesignWe adopted a qualitative exploratory design, using an online survey between September and October 2024. Participants provided anonymised demographic information and completed up to four prompts capturing their stakeholder role, needs and priorities. Data were analysed using a combined inductive-deductive framework to produce synthesised shortlists of priorities and needs.

Setting/participantsUK-based professional and public participants were recruited through social media, professional networks, charities, and public engagement events.

ResultsIn total, 439 participants contributed 729 responses across various stakeholder groups. Findings revealed substantial diversity in stakeholder needs and priorities, both within and between groups. However, most stakeholder groups prioritised timely care, minimising of suffering, and wanted nationally consistent guidance for using injectable medications. Broader societal influences also shaped responses.

ConclusionsOur findings highlight wide diversity in priorities and needs between stakeholders for using anticipatory injectable medications in the community. We propose that inclusive system design should include comprehensive assessment of key stakeholders needs and priorities, with the aim of providing better care. Our study demonstrates that stakeholder needs assessment offers a valuable framework to achieve this.

What is already known about the topic?O_LIAnticipatory injectable medications are a widely used intervention in several countries to support timely end-of-life symptom control at home.
C_LIO_LIThere are ongoing challenges with delays, inconsistent access, and variations in prescribing and governance across regions, indicating that system design influences both timeliness and safety.
C_LIO_LIExisting research has primarily focused on the needs of individual professional groups, and no prior work has mapped the differing needs of all stakeholders involved in these systems.
C_LI

What this paper adds?O_LIOur study demonstrates that stakeholder groups have diverse needs but most share some core priorities -timely care, national consistency in practice guidance, and minimising suffering.
C_LIO_LIWider societal factors and concerns shape stakeholder expectations of end-of-life medication systems.
C_LIO_LIOur approach to stakeholder needs assessment reveals system requirements that consensus-based or single-perspective approaches often overlook.
C_LI

Implications for practice, theory, or policyO_LISystem improvements should be tailored to the specific needs of key stakeholder groups rather than assuming uniform priorities.
C_LIO_LIStrong cross-stakeholder support exists for national, practical guidance on anticipatory prescribing, equipment, training, and governance.
C_LIO_LIStakeholder needs assessment offers a useful method for designing safer, more responsive end-of-life medication systems.
C_LI
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Perera, B., Bowers, B. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-05</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.01.02.26343333</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA['I need policymakers to listen: a stakeholder needs assessment concerning anticipatory injectable medication systems, using a novel qualitative survey]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.01.02.26343350v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
An external, contemporary evaluation of the Epic End of Life Care Index among hospitalized patients across two large health systems: A retrospective cohort study 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.01.02.26343350v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
BackgroundThe Epic End of Life Care Index (EOLCI) predicts one-year mortality and was developed to improve serious illness care. However, prior external EOLCI evaluations had limited sample sizes, populations, and equity evaluations. In preparation for a multi-system pragmatic clinical trial, we sought to evaluate the EOLCI performance and equity in the trials two participating health systems.

ObjectiveEvaluate EOLCI model performance overall and across key subgroups.

Design/Setting/PatientsRetrospective cohort study of patients hospitalized for [&ge;]36 hours in 2022 to 39 hospitals in the Trinity Health and Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC) health systems.

MeasurementsWe predicted one-year mortality risk stratified by health system using the EOLCI, a logistic regression model including age, sex, race/ethnicity, ethnicity, insurance, and diagnoses. We evaluated model performance using Scaled Brier Scores (SBS; range -1 to 1; composite measures of calibration and discrimination), calibration plots, and c-statistics.

ResultsAmong 116,749 Trinity patients with 154,063 encounters, 12,054 (10.3%) patients died within one year. Among 94,489 KPSC patients with 133,043 encounters, 16,872 (17.9%) died within one year. The SBS was -0.007 at Trinity and 0.178 at KPSC. Calibration was poor for both. Trinitys discrimination was acceptable/good (c-statistic 0.76, 95% CI 0.76-0.77), and KPSCs was good/very good (c-statistic 0.81, 95% CI 0.81-0.81). Model performance across subgroups was similar to the overall cohort.

LimitationsDeath data were collected exclusively within Trinity and KPSC, risking outcome misclassification; several subgroup evaluations were limited by small sample sizes.

ConclusionsAn external evaluation of the widely available Epic EOLCI demonstrated adequate to very good discrimination, poor calibration, and equitable performance across sociodemographic characteristics and diagnoses in two of the nations largest health systems.

Primary funding sourcePCORI PLACER-2022C3-30553.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Kohn, R., Courtright, K. R., Grau-Sepulveda, M., Olsen, M. K., Madden, V. L., Sewell, B., Sheu, D., Ahmad, Y. S., Auriemma, C. L., Nimetz, A., Dennos, A., Hart, K. W., Lee, J., Creekmur, B., Nau, C. L., Nguyen, H. Q., Wang, S., Boyer, G., Lundstrom, T., Postema, L., Roth, D. J., Vandewarker, J., Halpern, S. D., Lokhnygina, Y. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.01.02.26343350</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[An external, contemporary evaluation of the Epic End of Life Care Index among hospitalized patients across two large health systems: A retrospective cohort study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.01.06.26343556v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Support needs, support use and perceived helpfulness of support in a cohort of people bereaved during the COVID-19 pandemic: Insights from a longitudinal survey 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.01.06.26343556v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
BackgroundThe negative impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on bereavement experiences and grief outcomes are relatively well documented. However, less is known about the evolving support needs of people bereaved during this time, what support they used and, crucially, how this support helped (or hindered) their coping. Beyond the pandemic context, evidence of how bereavement support needs relate to the use and perceived helpfulness of different types of support is needed to inform bereavement service provision and policies.

MethodsA longitudinal survey of people bereaved (any cause of death) during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK, with data collected at four time points: baseline (T1; n = 711), c. 8 (T2; n = 384), 13 (T3; n = 295), and 25 (T4; n = 185) months post-bereavement. Support needs and use of informal and formal support sources were captured quantitatively at all time points, with the perceived helpfulness of support captured as free-text data and analysed thematically. Future support preferences were obtained in the final survey round (T4). At T2-T4, participants completed the Traumatic Grief Inventory (TGI-SR) to assess for indications of Prolonged Grief Disorder (PGD). Quantitative data were analysed descriptively.

ResultsIn early bereavement, findings demonstrate high levels of support needs across multiple domains, with the highest needs at baseline relating to managing grief and feelings surrounding the loss (49.9-59.8% across 4 items), feelings of anxiety and depression (52.8%) and social isolation and loneliness (52.0%). Support needs decreased markedly over time but persisted for those with indicated PGD, of whom 44.2% at two-years post-bereavement (T4) needed help with coming to terms with how their loved one died and with expressing their feelings and feeling understood and 41.2% with loneliness and isolation. Participants primarily relied on support from family and friends, followed by online community support and one-to-one support (counselling), with support use decreasing over time. Those with indicated PGD engaged with all types of support more frequently across all time points, yet a third (35.3%) did not access any formal bereavement or mental health support during the first year following their bereavement. The qualitatively described benefits of different informal and formal support sources reflected and demonstrated their efficacy in meeting these support needs, though inadequacies in support were also highlighted, particularly from friends and family. Support preferences for future bereavements under non-pandemic circumstances most commonly included family and friends (96%), in-person one-to-one support (75%), self-help resources (63%) and GPs (61%).

ConclusionFindings illustrate the multiple and varied emotional and social support needs of bereaved people, which for those with indicated PGD endured over time. While these needs can be effectively met by informal and formal support-types, dissatisfaction with support from friends and family, and under-utilisation of formal support services amongst high-risk groups, suggests significant unmet need and missed opportunities. This highlights the importance of strengthening the support available to people within their networks and communities and improving access to a wide variety of support options, according to peoples needs and preferences.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Goss, S., Barawi, K., Sutton, E., Oates, R., Seddon, K., Sivell, S., Longo, M., Penny, A., Selman, L. E., Harrop, E. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-09</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.01.06.26343556</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Support needs, support use and perceived helpfulness of support in a cohort of people bereaved during the COVID-19 pandemic: Insights from a longitudinal survey]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.01.23.26344608v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
How does palliative care fit into national health spending? A secondary analysis of trends in long-term healthcare expenditure in the United Kingdom 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.01.23.26344608v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
ObjectivesCurrent methods of health expenditure reporting make spending on palliative care services difficult to quantify. This paper (1) examines trends in the components of government (public) spending on health-related long-term care reported in the UK Health Accounts for the period of 2013 to 2022 to establish the wider context of palliative care expenditure, and (2) relates these trends to existing knowledge of expenditure on specialist palliative care services in the UK.

MethodsWe conducted a descriptive secondary analysis of annually reported government expenditure on health-related long-term care between 2013 and 2022 from the UK Health Accounts dataset. We contrasted this with UK governmental and non-governmental spending on specialist palliative care services using annual expenditure figures reported by Hospice UK.

ResultsReal-terms UK government spending on health-related long-term care grew by {pound}6.4 billion (22.9%) between 2013 and 2022, from {pound}27.9 to {pound}34.3 billion. Real-terms spending on specialist palliative care grew by {pound}110 million (10.7%) over the same period, from {pound}1,027 to {pound}1,137 million.

In 2022, spending on inpatient care comprised the majority of government health-related long-term care expenditure ({pound}22.6 billion; 65.9%). Home-based care comprised one-third ({pound}11.8 billion; 33.4%). Outpatient care accounted for 0.7% ({pound}260.2 million). Equivalent data was not available for analysis of specialist palliative care expenditure.

ConclusionsLow granularity of UK national health expenditure accounts limits national and international comparisons of spending on palliative care. However, it is clear that UK expenditure on specialist palliative care services has not kept pace with growth in expenditure on health-related long-term care.

What is already known on this topicO_LIGlobal demand for palliative care is increasing as rates of serious life-limiting illness, dementia, cancer and multiple long-term conditions rise internationally.
C_LIO_LIIncreasing complexity of illness and population ageing are two factors implicated in both rising healthcare expenditure and growing demand for palliative care internationally.
C_LIO_LIThe UK has previously been ranked as providing the highest quality of palliative care amongst international competitors - however, concerns about the longevity of funding sources for specialist palliative care services has led to calls for further investment.
C_LI

What this study addsO_LIReal terms UK government spending on health-related long-term care - which includes, but is not limited to, palliative care services - increased by 22.9% between 2013 and 2022.
C_LIO_LIOver the same period, UK spending on specialist palliative care services as reported by Hospice UK grew by only 10.7%.
C_LIO_LIOur results take into account health-related social care spending, which forms a key part of care for people living with illness, including those receiving palliative care services.
C_LI

How this study might affect research, practice or policyO_LIThe future of funding for specialist palliative care in the UK is uncertain, and current funding frameworks are complex. This paper adds to ongoing policy discussions surrounding this issue, highlighting the discrepancy between growth in public sector spending on health-related long-term care and overall spending on specialist palliative care services (from governmental and non-governmental sources).
C_LI
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ De-Alker, E., Alcock, A., Murtagh, F. E. M. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.01.23.26344608</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[How does palliative care fit into national health spending? A secondary analysis of trends in long-term healthcare expenditure in the United Kingdom]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
