﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">
<channel rdf:about="http://medrxiv.org">
<admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:medrxiv@cshlpress.edu"/>
<title>medrxiv Subject Collection: Pain Medicine Palliative Medicine</title>
<link>http://medrxiv.org</link>
<description>
This feed contains articles for medRxiv Subject Collection "Pain Medicine Palliative Medicine"
</description>

<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.13.26360409v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.14.26360457v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.13.26360364v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.07.26359966v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.07.26359945v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.06.26359876v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.05.26359702v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.04.26359660v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.03.26359604v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.31.26359372v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.24.26357716v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.24.26358500v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.22.26358710v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.22.26358645v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.12.26356929v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.11.26357570v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.08.26357000v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.01.26356632v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.02.26356879v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.01.26356998v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.06.15.26355697v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.06.23.26356401v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.06.21.26356167v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.06.12.26355509v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.06.10.26355353v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.06.01.26354382v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.06.05.26355003v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.06.05.26354913v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.05.31.26354558v1?rss=1"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.05.29.26354422v1?rss=1"/>
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
<prism:eIssn/>
<prism:publicationName>medrxiv</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn/>

<image rdf:resource=""/>
</channel>
<image rdf:about="">
<title>medrxiv</title>
<url>https://www.medrxiv.org/sites/default/files/medrxiv_internal_logo.png</url>
<link>http://medrxiv.org</link>
</image>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.13.26360409v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Pain on the Street: Implementation of a Field-Based Pain Response for People Experiencing Homelessness 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.13.26360409v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
Background: Homeless individuals are disproportionately affected by limited access to primary care and pain management services. While community-based organizations frequently conduct outreach, few have ethical, standardized, or replicable methods for assessing pain and distributing referrals in field settings. Existing models range from passive, meals-only outreach, to costly mobile clinics with limited reach. This leaves a critical gap that a low-resource, agile framework is designed to address. Objective: The aim of this quality-improvement initiative was to implement and iteratively refine a standardized, field-based pain assessment and response pathway for adults experiencing homelessness and to evaluate its feasibility, fidelity, safety, and operational barriers during routine outreach. Methods: A cross-sectional quality improvement needs assessment was conducted during homeless outreach activities in San Francisco and Sacramento using convenience sampling. The intervention framework incorporated volunteer training, cognitive capacity screening, verbal informed consent, vital sign collection, and predefined criteria for emergency escalation. Participants were unsheltered adults with adequate decisional capacity to provide voluntary informed consent. Results: The dataset included 193 encounters, with valid pain scores for 175 participants. Mean pain was 3.79 plus or minus 2.78, with a median of 3. Cold packs were used for acute discomfort and foot or ankle pain, while hot packs were used for joint pain. Some participants declined comfort measures. No supply shortages, referral confusion, or emergency-escalation delays were documented. Telephone access remained a barrier to referral completion. Conclusion: This framework demonstrates a replicable and ethically grounded model for field-based pain assessment and referral during homeless outreach. The pathway was feasible and safe to implement, expanded care options beyond default emergency-department referral by directing stable nonemergent pain toward primary care, and identified limited telephone access as a major barrier to completing follow-up.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Valliant, S. J., Joseph, M., Sharma, M., Durosinmi, G. P., Fitts, D., Tran, S., Gonzalez, A., Kothari, S., Anderson, T., Ralh, R., Lee, A. K., Parton, S., Shirinzada, F., Kulik, C. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-08-17</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.08.13.26360409</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pain on the Street: Implementation of a Field-Based Pain Response for People Experiencing Homelessness]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-08-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.14.26360457v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Pain and Pain Sensitivity Assessments in the Acute to Chronic Pain Signatures (A2CPS) Program 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.14.26360457v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
The Acute to Chronic Pain Signatures (A2CPS) project is a large, multisite, longitudinal observational study designed to identify biomarkers that predict the transition from acute to chronic pain following surgery in more than 2200 patients. Two participant cohorts were recruited before undergoing either knee arthroplasty or thoracic surgery. A unique feature of this study is its comprehensive evaluation of pain, including evoked and recall pain measures collected at baseline, 6-weeks, and 3-months following surgery, in addition to the primary pain outcome assessed remotely at 6 months. This paper describes the acquisition, quality control procedures, and available pain and pain sensitivity variables included in the A2CPS study. Self-report pain assessments include surgical site (i.e., index) pain intensity, pain interference and quality, spatial distribution of pain using body maps, and pain-related dysfunction specific to each cohort. Quantitative sensory testing yielded evoked pain sensitivity data including pressure pain thresholds, temporal summation of pain, dynamic mechanical allodynia, and conditioned pain modulation at both index and common sites across cohorts. Movement-evoked pain was assessed for each cohort using relevant functional tasks (knee: 10m walk and five-time-sit-to-stand tests, thoracic: deep breathing and coughing). Using baseline data from release v2.1.0, comprising approximately 1,400 participants, we evaluated interrelationships among pain variables. Overall, the A2CPS pain and pain sensitivity data provide a robust, comprehensive set of variables that supports the studys goal of uncovering predictive biomarkers of post-operative chronic pain and enables broader exploration relative to other study outcomes, including imaging, psychosocial, and "omics" data.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Frey-Law, L. A., Berardi, G., Ansari, B., Liu, Y., Satpathy-Horton, B., Sluka, K. A., Vance, C. G., Dailey, D. L., McCarthy, R. J., Wager, T. D., Lindquist, M. A., Harte, S. E., A2CPS Consortium ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-08-17</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.08.14.26360457</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pain and Pain Sensitivity Assessments in the Acute to Chronic Pain Signatures (A2CPS) Program]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-08-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.13.26360364v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
The implementation of a falls observational tool and its clinical effectiveness of reducing falls in a palliative care setting: a mixed methods study 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.13.26360364v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
Background Falls are a major safety concern in healthcare. In palliative care, patients are particularly vulnerable due to complex symptom burdens and rapid physical decline. However, standard falls risk assessment tools, primarily designed for acute clinical environments, rely on static risk scores and lack efficacy in hospice settings. The Falls Early Warning Score (FEWS) is a observational tool developed to address the specific contributing factors and complex needs of palliative patients. Aims To explore and understand staff views regarding the implementation, utility, and benefits of the FEWS tool to identify people at risk of falling in a specialist palliative care inpatient unit. Methods A mixed-methods study was conducted at a UK hospice. Healthcare professionals with clinical experience using the FEWS chart completed an electronic questionnaire assessing their confidence, practice, and perceived barriers. Questionnaire outcomes informed subsequent face-to-face, semi-structured interviews. Qualitative data were evaluated using reflexive thematic analysis. Results Eleven staff completed the questionnaire, and five participated in interviews. Three major themes were identified: (1) Education, highlighting staff preferences for 1:1 training and the necessity of dedicated user guides; (2) Location and format of the FEWS tool, contrasting the data collection benefits of electronic formats against the bedside accessibility of paper charts; and (3) Recognised benefits of the FEWS tool, including its ability to prompt safe staffing levels, highlight variable patient presentation, and mitigate the emotional and physical impact of falls. Conclusions It is feasible and highly acceptable to integrate bespoke falls risk assessment tools into palliative care. By addressing the unique complexities of hospice patients, customised tools like FEWS can empower staff and support dynamic clinical decision-making. Further research is required to evaluate their clinical efficacy in reducing falls.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Parfitt, C., Kirk, E., Stanley, S., Nwosu, A. C. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-08-14</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.08.13.26360364</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The implementation of a falls observational tool and its clinical effectiveness of reducing falls in a palliative care setting: a mixed methods study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-08-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.07.26359966v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Relevance Based Prediction: A Transparent, Non-Artificial Intelligence, Mathematical Solution to Personalized Opioid Treatment 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.07.26359966v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
Accurate prediction of individual medical outcomes is essential for optimizing treatment allocation amid rising costs, coverage denials, and limited clinical resources. Traditional predictive models, including regression and neural networks, rely on average effects and cannot tailor predictions to the specific circumstances of individual cases. We present relevance-based prediction (RBP), a model-free method that predicts outcomes as weighted averages of observed cases, with weights determined by a rigorously defined measure of relevance. Unlike model-based methods that rely on fixed calibrated parameters, RBP revisits the original data for each prediction and customizes both the cases and variables used. Applied to opioid treatment, RBP provides case-specific insights unavailable from conventional models, including how each prior case informs a prediction, how each variable affects its reliability and value, and how reliable the prediction is before it is made. These individualized insights may prevent misleading average-based decisions and reduce harmful or suboptimal treatment.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Robinson, C. L., Turkington, D., Lee, L., Kritzman, M., Yong, R. J. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-08-10</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.08.07.26359966</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Relevance Based Prediction: A Transparent, Non-Artificial Intelligence, Mathematical Solution to Personalized Opioid Treatment]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-08-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.07.26359945v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Targeted Pulsed Radio Frequency (PRF) Stimulation in the Management of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.07.26359945v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical efficacy of non-invasive electrical pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) stimulation on diagnostic thresholds and subjective pain in chronic, pedal diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN).

MethodsA randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT07725419) enrolled 92 patients with pedal DPN naive to PRF and scoring [&ge;] 4/10 on the Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) test. Participants received either active PRF stimulation (n = 46) or a non-stimulating placebo (n = 46) applied bilaterally to the sciatic nerve in the popliteal fossa for 10 minutes per limb, once weekly for three weeks. The primary outcome was clinical neuropathic resolution (DN4 < 4). Secondary outcomes included subjective pain tracking via the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst Pain scale over a 6-month follow-up window.

Missing data were handled via Non-Responder Imputation (NRI). Longitudinal continuous trajectories were modeled using Linear Mixed-Effects Models (LMMs) adjusted for age, gender, and baseline medication use.

ResultsIn the Intention-to-Treat population (N = 92), a significant diagnostic responder effect occurred at 3 months, with 39.1% of active patients dropping below the diagnostic threshold for neuropathy (DN4 < 4) versus 19.6% of placebo controls (p = 0.039). For subjective pain, 47.7% of active patients achieved a Minimally Clinically Important Difference ([&ge;] 3-point reduction) in BPI Worst Pain at 1 month compared to 19.4% of placebo controls (p = 0.008). Multivariable logistic regression identified active treatment as a significant independent predictor of clinical response (Adjusted OR = 4.86; 95% CI: 1.56 to 17.53; p = 0.010). Continuous LMM tracking confirmed a statistically significant treatment-by-timepoint interaction for BPI Worst Pain at 1 month (p = 0.046).

ConclusionA brief, three-week course of non-invasive PRF stimulation serves as a safe, effective, non-pharmacological adjunct that aids in managing the diagnostic presentation of neuropathic pain and mitigates worst pain experiences in patients suffering from pedal DPN.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Linde, L. D., Berger, P. P., Landau, S. S., Libhaber, E., Potgieter, P., van Blerk, P., Birkill, C. F. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-08-10</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.08.07.26359945</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Targeted Pulsed Radio Frequency (PRF) Stimulation in the Management of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-08-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.06.26359876v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Development of an interdisciplinary network to improve the capacity to conduct digital legacy research: a quality improvement initiative 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.06.26359876v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
BackgroundDigital legacy (the digital information available about someone following their death) has increasing societal importance as personal assets and interactions become increasingly digitized. Healthcare professionals often have a limited understanding of how to address digital legacy in practice, and there is a lack of interdisciplinary networks to improve education, research, and professional development in digital legacy.

ObjectiveThis paper describes the development of an interdisciplinary initiative designed to build research capacity and develop consensus-based recommendations for integrating digital legacy into palliative care.

MethodOver 12-months, we conducted interdisciplinary engagement activities with diverse stakeholders, including clinicians, designers, and sociologists. We used a modified World Cafe method to facilitate dialogue and capture feedback on how memories are digitally curated, the management of digital estates, and intergenerational perspectives on digital legacy.

ResultsWe identified eight core recommendations for research and policy, including promoting digital legacy education, supporting policy development, and broadening the scope of interdisciplinary research. Our discussions highlighted the complexity of modern digital estates and the need for legal and ethical frameworks to protect individual rights.

ConclusionsThe Network demonstrates that interdisciplinary collaboratives can address important issues relating to digital legacy, which provides a foundation to conduct collaborative research that improves the management of digital legacies in society.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Nwosu, A. C., Tibbles, A., Goodwin, C., Kaye, L., Stanley, S. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-08-10</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.08.06.26359876</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development of an interdisciplinary network to improve the capacity to conduct digital legacy research: a quality improvement initiative]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-08-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.05.26359702v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Neural Alterations in Chronic Pain: MRI Analysis 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.05.26359702v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
BackgroundChronic pain affects hundreds of millions worldwide and remains a major clinical challenge, despite numerous available treatments. Advances in brain imaging offer a promising path toward identifying neural signatures of chronic pain, potentially enhancing diagnosis and guiding treatment. However, while a core set of brain regions, including the insula, cingulate, and somatosensory cortices, has been repeatedly implicated, findings regarding other regions and connectivity patterns involved remain inconsistent, with limited robust replication.

ObjectiveTo address these gaps, the present work characterizes resting-state functional connectivity and gray matter volume differences between chronic pain patients and pain-free controls.

MethodsIn this secondary analysis of publicly available data, anatomical and resting-state functional MRI were analyzed from 56 patients with chronic knee pain due to osteoarthritis and 20 pain-free controls. Group comparisons used Network-Based Statistic (NBS) and Bayesian multivariate regression models, controlling for demographic covariates.

ResultsIn the pain group, about 75% of parcellated brain regions exhibited increased functional connectivity compared to controls. The 30 highest degree centrality regions in the NBS network were concentrated in regions consistent with prior pain neuroimaging findings. Additionally, chronic pain patients exhibited reduced gray matter volume (-3.98%; SD 1.2%) across 33% of parcellated brain regions, including key regions implicated in pain processing.

ConclusionsThese findings demonstrate widespread functional and anatomical neural alterations in chronic pain, revealing a global pattern of reorganization extending beyond previously reported network-pair effects. Characterizing such alterations may contribute to ongoing efforts to identify neuroimaging markers of chronic pain, with potential translational relevance.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Cohen-Blum, L., Eizman, S., Tetreault, P., Duek, O. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-08-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.08.05.26359702</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Neural Alterations in Chronic Pain: MRI Analysis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-08-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.04.26359660v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Biobehavioral pain profiling of minoritized adults with chronic widespread pain and clinical obesity before and after bariatric surgery: study protocol for a longitudinal, observational cohort study 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.04.26359660v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
Chronic widespread pain (CWP) is highly prevalent among minoritized adults with clinical obesity, and symptom management is challenging. Weight loss via bariatric surgery is often recommended to improve musculoskeletal pain. However, there is significant variation in pain trajectories following bariatric surgery, and the impact of weight loss on movement-evoked pain is largely unknown. The current study aims to systematically characterize and quantify longitudinal changes in pain at rest and movement-evoked pain up to 6 months post-surgery, and to determine whether pain modulatory mechanisms, joint motion, and mechanical loading biosignatures mediate the relationship between weight loss and pain change. This study protocol details the research methodologies and procedures for a prospective observational cohort study of 60 individuals undergoing bariatric surgery for weight loss. Participants will complete questionnaires, anthropometric measurements, clinical and experimental pain testing, functional testing, and a standardized movement testing battery to assess joint motion and mechanical loading using camera-based motion capture before and at 3 and 6 months post- bariatric surgery. Generalized linear mixed models to assess the significance of changes in PAR, MEP, and all patient-reported outcome measures. Reduced models will treat the main effect of time as a fixed factor, and intra-individual repeated measures as random effects. Ethics and dissemination: This study protocol has been registered as an observational study with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT0675386), version #1, in the United States and has been approved by the NYU Langone Health Institutional Review Board (IRB#: i21-01652) and the New York City Health + Hospitals/Bellevue Research Office (Bellevue Study ID #: STUDY00003739). Study results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences and community events.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Merriwether, E. N., Maqsood, M. N., Vanegas, S. M., Em, S., Perez, N., Parikh, M., Ruiz-Guerenabarrena, B., Humala-Martinez, C., Lopez, B., Fillingim, R. B., Jay, M. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-08-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.08.04.26359660</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Biobehavioral pain profiling of minoritized adults with chronic widespread pain and clinical obesity before and after bariatric surgery: study protocol for a longitudinal, observational cohort study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-08-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.03.26359604v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Multidimensional symptom burden across sleep, pain, affect, cognition and energy: cross-sectional associations with chronic pain interference and work disability in UK Biobank 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.03.26359604v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
BackgroundSleep, pain, affect, cognition and energy (SPACE) has been described as a latent symptom-severity construct in chronic overlapping pain conditions. Its population-level structure and associations with chronic pain interference and functional disability remain uncertain.

MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional analysis of UK Biobank participants aged [&ge;]40 years. Prespecified standardised symptom domains were examined using correlation analysis, principal component analysis, exploratory factor analysis and k-means clustering. Associations with chronic pain interference, current work disability, poor self-rated health and longstanding illness or disability were assessed using covariate-adjusted logistic regression. A four-domain score excluding pain tested whether associations extended beyond the pain domain. Secondary analyses examined convergence with actigraphy, biomarkers, polygenic risk scores and brain magnetic resonance imaging phenotypes.

ResultsOf 501,935 eligible participants, 475,134 had complete domain data. Domains were modestly intercorrelated (r=0.04-0.46). Clustering identified lower- and higher-burden phenotypes comprising 70.5% and 29.5% of participants; current work disability occurred in 1.3% and 10.3%, respectively. Adding the four non-pain domains increased the area under the curve for chronic pain interference from 0.593 to 0.672 and for work disability from 0.748 to 0.850. Inclusion of pain increased the work-disability area under the curve to 0.863. Multimodal measures added smaller increments.

ConclusionsA multidimensional symptom profile was identifiable at population scale and was concurrently associated with chronic pain interference and work disability, with non-pain domains contributing information beyond pain burden alone.

SignificanceChronic pain interference and work disability were associated with a broader multidimensional symptom burden spanning sleep, affect, cognition and energy, rather than pain alone. In a large population cohort, the non-pain domains added substantial concurrent discriminatory information. These findings support multidimensional assessment of functionally impairing pain and justify prospective evaluation of whether symptom-system profiles predict incident disability, healthcare use, recovery trajectories or treatment response.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Ciechanowicz, S., Li, K., Ma, D. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-08-05</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.08.03.26359604</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Multidimensional symptom burden across sleep, pain, affect, cognition and energy: cross-sectional associations with chronic pain interference and work disability in UK Biobank]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-08-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.31.26359372v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Pain-Reporting Variability and Reliability as Predictors of Placebo Effects: A Cross-Sectional Experimental Pain Study 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.31.26359372v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
Placebo analgesia varies substantially across individuals, yet the sources of this heterogeneity remain incompletely understood. Pain-reporting variability may represent an underrecognized predictor of placebo responsiveness. This study examined whether variability and reliability of pain reporting predict placebo analgesia in an experimental pain setting.

Eight hundred and three participants (401 individuals with temporomandibular disorder and 400 healthy controls) completed a standardized thermal pain paradigm involving calibration, placebo conditioning, and testing phases. We obtained repeated heat temperatures (four) during thermal calibration and pain ratings during conditioning test (24 trials). We used these measurements to quantify within-person pain-reporting variability using standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CoV), and reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Placebo analgesia was calculated as the difference in pain ratings between control and placebo cue trials during testing. Regression models examined associations between reporter characteristics and placebo analgesia controlling for age, sex, race and experimenters.

Variability of thermal pain responses during calibration did not predict placebo analgesia. Greater pain-reporting variability during conditioning was associated with reduced placebo analgesia (higher SD and CoV), and this effect was mediated by slower acquisition of the cue- pain contingency. Conditioning-phase reliability was not associated with placebo analgesia, whereas three clusters of learning profiles predicted placebo effects. Thus, individual differences in pain-reporting variability during conditioning, rather than baseline sensory variability, contribute to heterogeneity in placebo analgesia. These findings suggest that variability during acquisition processing matters more than general sensory variability influencing the magnitude of placebo effects.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Cottam, J. A. R., Wang, Y., Akintola, T., Farrar, J., Chen, C., McArdle, P., Ament, S. A., Corlett, P. A., Dorsey, S. G., Treister, R., Colloca, L. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-08-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.07.31.26359372</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pain-Reporting Variability and Reliability as Predictors of Placebo Effects: A Cross-Sectional Experimental Pain Study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-08-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.24.26357716v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Analgesic Efficacy of Native Himalayan Shilajit as Add-On Therapy in Myofascial Pain Syndrome: An Exploratory Pilot Clinical Trial 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.24.26357716v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
BACKGROUNDMyofascial Pain Syndrome (MPS) is a common musculoskeletal pain condition associated with myofascial trigger points that has been reported to occur in 30-93% of patients who present with musculoskeletal pain. The current pharmacologic treatments (such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs], muscle relaxants, and tricyclic antidepressants) are only partially effective and have side effects. Shilajit, a mineral-organic exudate from the Himalayas, has antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, mitochondrial bioenergetic, and central analgesic effects and has not previously been examined as an analgesic in any musculoskeletal pain condition.

METHODSThis was an exploratory pilot clinical trial with open-label design in a single arm for an 18-month period at All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Rishikesh, India. Patients aged 18 to 65 years with clinically diagnosed MPS (Simons et al. 1999 criteria) and a baseline visual analog scale (VAS) score >4 were enrolled. Native Himalayan Shilajit 250 mg daily was administered as add-on therapy for 49 days. The main outcome was the percentage of participants with [&ge;]30% VAS reduction at Day 49. The intensity of pain, the dose of analgesics consumed and the number of trigger points were evaluated at five time points (Day 0, 12, 24, 36, 49). Throughout, adverse events were monitored.

RESULTSOf 80 enrolled participants, 76 (95.0%) completed the per-protocol analysis. Mean age was 41.25 {+/-} 9.05 years; 52.6% were male. A total of 56 of 76 participants (73.7%; 95% CI: 62.1- 82.8%) achieved the primary endpoint. Mean VAS score declined from 6.63 {+/-} 1.08 at baseline to.63 {+/-} 1.72 at Day 49 (mean reduction 45.3%; Friedman {chi}2 = 278.5, p<0.001). The first signs of pain reduction were seen at Day 24. The number of analgesic doses consumed decreased by 75.5% during the study period ({chi}2 = 126.1, p<0.001). There was a significant reduction in trigger point count from baseline to Day 49 (p=0.031) of 23.4%. One Grade 2 adverse event (gastrointestinal irritation, Day 28, resolved within 24 hours, no drug discontinuation) occurred; no serious adverse events were reported. Trial registration: CTRI/2025/06/088636. The study was not funded by any external sources.

CONCLUSIONSNative Himalayan Shilajit 250 mg/day for 49 days was associated with clinically and statistically significant reductions in pain intensity, analgesic consumption, and trigger-point burden in patients with MPS, with a favorable safety profile. These findings warrant confirmation in a larger, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Basavaraja, D., Kant, R., Pai, V. S., Yadav, R., Chikara, G., Tomar, S., Sircar, D., Sambhaji, K. R., Panda, P. K. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-08-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.07.24.26357716</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Analgesic Efficacy of Native Himalayan Shilajit as Add-On Therapy in Myofascial Pain Syndrome: An Exploratory Pilot Clinical Trial]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-08-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.24.26358500v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Development and Psychometric Validation of the Pelvic Dystonia Severity Scale (PDSS) 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.24.26358500v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
BackgroundChronic pelvic pain with involuntary pelvic-floor hypertonicity is common, disabling, and inconsistently measured, and no validated condition-specific severity instrument exists. A refractory subset has been proposed to represent a focal dystonia of the pelvic musculature, termed pelvic dystonia.

PurposeTo develop the Pelvic Dystonia Severity Scale (PDSS) and evaluate its measurement properties as a patient-reported measure of pelvic-pain symptom severity and burden, following the COSMIN guidelines.

MethodsCross-sectional study with a test-retest component in 102 adults from an outpatient multidisciplinary pain practice. We assessed data quality, structural validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, measurement error, and construct validity against the Global Dystonia Severity Rating Scale (GDS) and Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). Because no validated diagnostic criteria exist, a clinician blinded to PDSS responses rated each participant for clinical signs of pelvic dystonia (present/possible/absent) as a provisional reference standard.

Results100 of 102 participants (98%) returned complete data, with 0% item-level missing data. Factor analysis supported a unidimensional structure (single factor, 68.6% of variance; loadings 0.56-0.93), with high subscale intercorrelations (r = 0.81-0.97). Internal consistency (Cronbachs  0.810-0.924) and test-retest reliability (ICC 0.857-0.953) were strong. Convergent validity was supported by correlations with GDS pelvic-region items (r = 0.56-0.68) and BPI severity (r = 0.44-0.55), and discriminant validity by weak correlations with anatomically remote regions (shoulder/arm r = 0.03-0.16). PDSS scores rose monotonically across blinded clinical-signs categories (absent 14.9, possible 32.7, present 52.0; Kruskal-Wallis p < 0.001), discriminating signs-present from signs-absent participants with a very large effect (Hedges g = 2.19; ROC AUC = 0.92).

ConclusionThe PDSS is a psychometrically robust, unidimensional measure of pelvic-pain symptom severity and burden with strong data quality, reliability, and construct validity. It is suitable for characterizing symptom severity and, pending responsiveness testing, for monitoring treatment. The dystonia interpretation of the underlying phenotype is discussed as a hypothesis for future neurophysiologic and longitudinal study.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Siefferman, J., Safroshkina, M., Nazarova, I., Zaznaev, A., Hasan, S. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-07-27</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.07.24.26358500</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development and Psychometric Validation of the Pelvic Dystonia Severity Scale (PDSS)]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-07-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.22.26358710v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Assessing Pain Catastrophizing Through Free-Text Responses: A Validation of Large Language Models 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.22.26358710v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
Validated measures of pain catastrophizing primarily assess catastrophizing as a stable trait. However, emerging evidence suggests catastrophizing fluctuates with context, highlighting a need for ecologically valid methods to capture it. This study evaluated large language models (LLMs) as implicit markers of catastrophizing from free-text responses from ninety-one adults with chronic pain receiving long-term opioid therapy (57.3% Female; mean age = 60.5 years). Patients completed baseline measures, including the trait pain catastrophizing scale (PCS), followed by a 10-minute writing task after random assignment to a negative, positive, or neutral pain-coping condition. State affect and pain were assessed before and after writing tasks and again after a cold pressor task (4{o}C; [&le;] 2 minutes). A state PCS followed the cold pressor task. Free-text responses were analyzed using four LLMs (Claude Opus 4; GPT Mini 4o; Llama 4 Maverick; and Gemini 2.5 Pro). ANOVA-based results supported discriminant validity, as all four LLM-derived pain catastrophizing scores differentiated negative from positive and neutral pain-coping conditions. Convergent validity was model-dependent; only Gemini-derived scores correlated with state catastrophizing (r = .22) and pain unpleasantness (r = .23). Divergent validity was mixed. LLM-derived scores were unrelated to pain intensity, but Gemini and Claude-derived scores showed small correlations with trait PCS (rs = .21; 28, respectively). All LLM-derived scores also correlated with negative affect (rs = .29-.41), comparable in magnitude to state PCS, suggesting limited specificity. These findings provide preliminary evidence that certain LLMs may serve as implicit markers of state pain catastrophizing, but further study is needed.

SummaryLeading Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate discriminant validity but mixed convergent and divergent validity scoring pain catastrophizing from persons living with chronic pain free-text responses.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Lee, A., You, D. S., Dildine, T. C. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-07-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.07.22.26358710</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Assessing Pain Catastrophizing Through Free-Text Responses: A Validation of Large Language Models]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-07-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.22.26358645v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Palliative Care among People with Advanced Heart Failure: Between Hospital Variation in the US Veterans Administration 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.22.26358645v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
BackgroundPalliative care is recommended by clinical practice guidelines for patients with advanced heart failure (aHF), yet specialty palliative care (SPC) remains substantially underutilized in this population. We sought to quantify between-facility variation in SPC receipt among people with aHF and determine how much variation is explained by patient case mix and facility structural characteristics versus residual unmeasured factors.

MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included 23,991 Veterans with prevalent aHF identified through administrative data across 133 VA Medical Centers (VAMCs) with [&ge;]20 aHF cases, from January 2022 to December 2023. Variation was assessed using multilevel logistic regression with facility random intercepts, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and the adjusted median odds ratio (aMOR). Facility-specific risk-standardized SPC rates were used to estimate SPC encounters attributable to facility performance better or worse than the national rate.

ResultsOf the sample, the mean patient age was 72.3 years (SD = 10.0), and 97.6% were male. The national observed rate of SPC was 17.5%, with risk-adjusted rates varying approximately 14-fold across facilities (3.3% to 45.6%). The adjusted ICC was 11.5%, and aMOR was 1.87 (95% Confidence Intervals 1.70-2.06). Measured patient case-mix and facility structural characteristics explained only 18.9% of between-facility variation (proportional reduction in the ICC, fully adjusted vs. null model). Facilities performing better than the national rate delivered 791 more SPC encounters than expected (17.8%), while those performing worse than the national rate delivered 480 fewer encounters than expected (10.8%).

ConclusionsIn the context of a national mean rate of SPC that reflects substantial underuse, delivery varied 14-fold across VAMCs, with most variation unexplained by patient complexity or measured facility resources. These findings suggest that potentially modifiable organizational factors, beyond patient preferences or facility structures alone, may contribute to current utilization gaps and represent actionable targets for quality improvement.

Clinical PerspectiveO_ST_ABSWhat is new?C_ST_ABSIn this national cohort of 23,991 people with advanced heart failure cared for at 133 VA Medical Centers, risk-adjusted rates of specialist palliative care delivery varied 14-fold across facilities (median odds ratio 1.87). Measured patient case-mix and facility structural characteristics explained only 18.9% of the between-facility variation.

Clinical implications?Substantial variation in palliative care delivery across VAMCs is not accounted for by differences in patient complexity or facility resources, suggesting that institutional processes and referral practices are key drivers and represent actionable targets for quality improvement.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Feder, S., Ouyang, N., Han, L., Abel, E., DeRycke, E., Kinder, D., Redeker, N., Curry, L. A., Lurhs, C., Levy, C., Ibarra, J., Kavalieratos, D., Akgun, K., Allen, L. A. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-07-23</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.07.22.26358645</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Palliative Care among People with Advanced Heart Failure: Between Hospital Variation in the US Veterans Administration]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-07-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.12.26356929v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
JAK-STAT pathway inhibition modulates centrally sensitised default mode network hubs in rheumatoid arthritis pain 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.12.26356929v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
Nociplastic pain represents a major burden across immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). It is hypothesised, but not yet demonstrated, that peripheral inflammation promotes nociplastic pain by bottom-up sensitisation of the central nervous system (CNS). In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a prototypic IMID, we used ultra-high field (7T) brain resting-state functional MRI to evaluate whether peripherally targeted anti-inflammatory therapies alter a biomarker of bottom-up CNS sensitisation: inferior parietal lobule (IPL)-insula connectivity. In discovery and replication cohorts, JAK-STAT pathway inhibitors significantly shifted IPL-insula connectivity toward a normalised pattern. This effect was not seen with placebo or anti-TNF therapy. Moreover, after performing an agnostic whole-brain multivariate analysis of functional connectivity change related to JAK-STAT inhibition, the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) was identified; like the IPL, a major hub of the default mode network (DMN). We then probed the DMN with transcranial magnetic stimulation in an independent RA cohort. Active, but not sham, stimulation altered DMN connectivity and reduced peripheral blood monocyte pSTAT3 function, a surrogate of immune inactivation, suggesting a bi-directional brain-immune circuit. Together, these findings provide the first human experimental evidence that peripheral JAK-STAT pathways contribute to nociplastic pain in IMIDs.

One Sentence SummaryBlocking peripheral JAK-STAT signalling reduces both objective and subjective nociplastic pain in rheumatoid arthritis, revealing a localised inflammatory driver behind a traditionally non-inflammatory pain state.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Stefanov, K., Parkinson, J. T., Sunzini, F., Al-Wasity, S., Kaplan, C. M., Schrepf, A., Ichesco, E., Porter, D. A., Keith, G. A., McGucken, A., Brock, J., Aldehmi, N., Paramo-Fiscal, L., Tulunay-Virlan, A., Arnott, M., Lau, T., Goodyear, C., Thut, G., Shenker, N., McInnes, I. B., Clauw, D. J., Cavangh, J., Basu, N. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-07-14</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.07.12.26356929</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[JAK-STAT pathway inhibition modulates centrally sensitised default mode network hubs in rheumatoid arthritis pain]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-07-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.11.26357570v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Psilocybin-Assisted Early Palliative Care for Demoralization and Chronic Pain: An Open-Label Pilot Study 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.11.26357570v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
BackgroundDemoralization, a syndrome of helplessness, hopelessness, and loss of meaning and chronic pain are common sources of distress in early palliative care. Psilocybin-assisted therapy (PAT) is an emerging intervention with preliminary data suggesting improvements in pain and demoralization. To date, PAT has not been studied among people living with both demoralization and chronic pain nor has it been studied as part of routine multidisciplinary outpatient palliative care.

ObjectivesWe conducted an open-label pilot study assessing the safety, feasibility, and acceptability of PAT delivered with multidisciplinary palliative care support in cancer patients across the illness trajectory living with demoralization and chronic pain.

MethodsParticipants received a single 25 mg oral dose of psilocybin with preparation, monitoring, and integration provided by a mental health clinician and spiritual health clinician, alongside multidisciplinary palliative care support. Outcomes included safety, feasibility, acceptability, and exploratory self-report measures assessing for demoralization and pain intensity pre- and post-dosing.

ResultsEleven participants were enrolled, ten of whom received psilocybin. The intervention was safe and feasible, with no serious adverse events and complete study visit retention among dosed participants. All 10 dosed participants reported the intervention as highly acceptable. Among dosed participants, 70% rated the experience among the five most meaningful and educational of their lives, and 60% among their five most spiritually significant experiences. By study endpoint, 90% no longer met criteria for clinically-significant demoralization syndrome and had pain scores below the trial enrollment threshold.

ConclusionsPAT delivered with multidisciplinary palliative care support was safe, feasible, and acceptable in demoralized cancer patients with chronic pain.

Key MessagePsilocybin-assisted therapy delivered within multidisciplinary outpatient palliative care was safe, feasible, and acceptable among demoralized cancer patients with chronic pain.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Zarrabi, A. J., Mletzko, T., Grant, G., Peacock, C., Palitsky, R. J., McPherson, T., Shub, I., Eisenacher, S., Maples-Keller, J. L., Kaplan, D., Rothbaum, B. O., Rab, F., Dalal, N., Curseen, K. A., Raison, C., Dunlop, B. W. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-07-14</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.07.11.26357570</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Psilocybin-Assisted Early Palliative Care for Demoralization and Chronic Pain: An Open-Label Pilot Study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-07-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.08.26357000v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Music listening for chronic pain management: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and evaluation of intervention reporting quality 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.08.26357000v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
BackgroundChronic pain is a multidimensional condition that often persists despite conventional treatment and adversely affects multiple domains of daily life. Music listening has emerged as a promising non-pharmacological intervention, with accumulating evidence supporting its beneficial effects on pain and associated psychological outcomes. However, despite growing evidence of efficacy, the translation of music listening into routine clinical practice remains limited, partly because intervention reporting has received comparatively little attention.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of music listening interventions for chronic pain and systematically assess the methodological quality and completeness of intervention reporting to identify barriers to reproducibility and clinical implementation.

MethodsSystematic searches were conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Web of Science through June 2025, with no date restrictions on publication. Randomized controlled trials involving adults with chronic pain receiving music listening interventions were included. Two independent reviewers screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Intervention reporting was evaluated using the TIDieR checklist, and a random-effects meta-analysis was performed for pain intensity outcomes.

ResultsTen RCTs involving 538 participants were included. Music listening interventions varied substantially in delivery, duration, and music selection procedures, reflecting considerable heterogeneity in intervention design. Most studies reported significant improvements in pain and psychological outcomes. Meta-analysis of eight trials (10 effect estimates), demonstrated a moderate reduction in pain intensity (SMD = -0.53, 95% CI: -0.96 to -0.11, p = 0.014; I{superscript 2} = 76.2%). Although intervention rationale and procedures were generally well described, reporting of intervention modifications, treatment fidelity, and adherence was frequently incomplete. These reporting deficiencies may compromise reproducibility and limit translation into clinical practice.

ConclusionsMusic listening appears to be a safe, accessible, and scalable non-pharmacological intervention for chronic pain management, with benefits extending beyond pain reduction to psychological wellbeing, quality of life, and functioning. However, incomplete reporting of key intervention components may limit reproducibility and hinder clinical implementation. Future trials should adopt standardized and transparent reporting standards to facilitate implementation into clinical practice.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Garrido-Pedrosa, J., Saez, M. T., Zapata, L., Porto, M. F., Valenzuela, R., Rodriguez-Fornells, A., Fernandez-Duenas, V., Grau-Sanchez, J. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-07-13</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.07.08.26357000</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Music listening for chronic pain management: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and evaluation of intervention reporting quality]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-07-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.01.26356632v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
The analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided fascia hydrorelease around the artery for myofascial neck pain: a prospective single-arm interventional study 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.01.26356632v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a major cause of chronic neck pain, with tissue ischemia implicated as a contributing factor. This prospective, single-arm interventional study evaluated the analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided fascia hydrorelease (US-FHR) performed around arteries supplying the neck in patients with chronic neck MPS. Thirteen adults (median age 53.0 years; 38.5% female) underwent US-FHR targeting the perivascular fascia of either the transverse cervical or dorsal scapular artery using 2 mL of normal saline. Pain intensity was assessed by visual analog scale (VAS) at rest and during movement; disability by the 5-item Pain Disability Index, Japanese version (PDI-5-J); and arterial blood flow volume before and after the procedure. The primary outcome, pain VAS during movement, decreased from 49.0 mm (interquartile range [IQR], 44.5-64.0) at baseline to 22.0 mm (IQR, 14.5-31.5) at 15 min and 22.0 mm (IQR, 14.0-34.0) at 1 week (Hodges-Lehmann median difference, 30.5 mm [95% CI, 24.5 to 36.5] and 28.5 mm [95% CI, 18.5 to 37.0]; both P < 0.001). Pain VAS at rest improved from 21.0 mm (IQR, 13.0-43.5) to 8.0 mm at 15 min and 1 week (median difference, 14.5 mm [95% CI, 9.0 to 24.0; P = 0.001] and 13.5 mm [95% CI, 6.0 to 21.0; P = 0.007]). PDI-5-J decreased from 17.0 (IQR, 10.5-23.0) to 13.0 (IQR, 4.0-17.5) at 1 week (median difference, 5 [95% CI, 2 to 8; P = 0.004]). Blood flow volume increased from 11.2 mL/min (IQR, 4.5-14.4) to 17.2 mL/min (IQR, 6.1-23.7) immediately after US-FHR (median difference, +4.1 mL/min [95% CI, +2.5 to +8.9; P = 0.001]), although transient. One patient experienced transient bleeding that was promptly controlled. In this single-arm feasibility study, US-FHR around the target artery was simple and safe to perform and was associated with reduced neck pain. Because the study lacked a control group, these preliminary findings should be regarded as hypothesis-generating and require confirmation in controlled trials; they may also inform the future evaluation of MPS in other anatomical regions. Trial registration: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000053612.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Hiroki, T., Kimura, H., Kobayashi, T., Horigome, H., Suda, M., Fukui, S., Suto, T., Obata, H. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-07-10</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.07.01.26356632</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided fascia hydrorelease around the artery for myofascial neck pain: a prospective single-arm interventional study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-07-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.02.26356879v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Exploring stakeholder perspectives on the content, delivery, and contextual delivery of shared decision-making for people living with subacromial pain syndrome: a multimethod study with future workshops and interviews 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.02.26356879v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
BackgroundShared decision-making (SDM) is a key component in patient-centered care for people consulting health care due to chronic musculoskeletal pain, including subacromial pain syndrome (SAPS). Limited research has explored how patients, relatives, and healthcare professionals perceive the content and delivery of SDM for managing SAPS in primary care. Thus, this study aims to explore stakeholder perspectives on the content, delivery, and contextual requirements for a context-specific SDM intervention for SAPS, and to identify shared challenges and co-develop ideas to inform intervention development.

MethodsWe conducted three separate future workshops (patients/relatives, physiotherapists/chiropractors, and general practitioners), each consisting of structured critique, fantasy, and implementation phases. A rapid preliminary analysis of workshop data was followed by semi-structured stakeholder interviews to validate, challenge, or elaborate the findings. All data were analysed thematically using an iterative, reflexive approach.

ResultsTwenty-eight participants took part across three workshops: patients/relatives (n = 10), physiotherapists/chiropractors (n = 12), and general practitioners (n = 6). Six additional stakeholders provided inputs via subsequent interviews (three physiotherapists, one patient, one relative and one GP). Thematic analysis identified 20 themes and 59 sub-themes, which were refined into two overarching categories: (1) shared barriers to SDM in SAPS care, including diagnostic uncertainty, fragmented clinical care pathways, time constraints, and decision fatigue; and (2) stakeholder visions for future SDM interventions, emphasising continuity, tailored communication tools, and supportive digital ecosystems.

ConclusionBased on stakeholder input, SDM in SAPS care may consider integrating dynamic, integrated systems that account for diagnostic ambiguity, contextual constraints, and varying patient capacities. These findings provide an actionable foundation for co-developing and piloting a context specific SDM intervention for primary care.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Lyng, K. D., Johansen, S. K., Foster, N. E., Olesen, J. L., Thomsen, J. L., Soendergaard, J., Rathleff, M. S. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-07-10</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.07.02.26356879</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exploring stakeholder perspectives on the content, delivery, and contextual delivery of shared decision-making for people living with subacromial pain syndrome: a multimethod study with future workshops and interviews]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-07-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.01.26356998v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Improving palliative care for babies, children, young people and adults from ethnically diverse communities: a qualitative multiple case study 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.01.26356998v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
BackgroundPalliative care services appear less able to reach people from ethnically diverse communities and if they do, people from these communities report having different and often poorer experiences. The barriers to access are well described so research investigating potential solutions is needed.

AimsTo understand how improved palliative care outcomes for people from ethnically diverse communities have or could be achieved, and what contextual issues have influenced these outcomes.

MethodsQualitative multiple case study. The cases were defined as areas across England with services providing generalist or specialist palliative care to adults and/or children. Interviews were conducted with patients, family carers, parents (from ethnically diverse communities), health and social care professionals. Data were analysed using thematic framework analysis.

FindingsCases (n=6) included 71 participants. Five solution focused themes were identified; how the conditions for culturally and spiritually safe care are created; engagement and trust building between ethnically diverse communities and the providers that serve them as a mechanism to promote access; workforce composition and diversity helping to bridge the gap between ethnically diverse communities and services; how communication practices enable equitable care for people who have English as an additional language and organisational commitment and partnership as drivers of sustainable change.

ConclusionsEquitable access to quality palliative care is not a marginal policy issue with the economic and moral argument for change strong. Care systems need to recognise, partner with, and build upon existing community strengths. Change requires intent, accountability, leadership and the reallocation of attention and responsibility.

HighlightsO_LIEnvironmental changes and flexible care enable people to feel safe and respected.
C_LIO_LIUsing an asset-based community engagement approach is useful to improve access.
C_LIO_LILocal staff can bridge the gap between services and ethnically diverse communities.
C_LIO_LIAccess to interpreters and translated material is imperative for equitable care.
C_LIO_LISustainable change requires organisational commitment and partnership working.
C_LI
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Dunleavy, L., Gould, S., Clarke, G., Cotterell, N., Bajwah, S., Evans, C., Fraser, L., Mitchell, S., Preston, N., Walshe, C. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-07-02</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.07.01.26356998</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Improving palliative care for babies, children, young people and adults from ethnically diverse communities: a qualitative multiple case study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-07-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.06.15.26355697v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Pain Catastrophizing, Pain Self-Efficacy, and their Interaction as Predictors of Health  Outcomes in Chronic Pain 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.06.15.26355697v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
IntroductionPain catastrophizing and pain self-efficacy are well-established predictors of health outcomes in chronic pain. Higher pain catastrophizing, a maladaptive cognitive process, predicts worse health outcomes, whereas higher pain self-efficacy, an adaptive cognitive process, predicts better health outcomes. This study examined whether pain catastrophizing and pain self-efficacy interactions predict physical and psychosocial health outcomes at 3 months and their change over 3-months among patients with chronic pain who sought care at a tertiary pain clinic.

MethodsAdults with chronic pain (N = 181; 66.7% female; Mage = 58.7) completed baseline assessments of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Chronic Pain Self-Efficacy Scale (CPSS), and PROMIS measures of physical (pain intensity, pain interference, physical function) and psychosocial health (depression, anxiety, anger, loneliness). PROMIS measures were repeated at 3 months. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses tested PCS, CPSS, and their interaction as predictors of outcomes at 3 months and change scores from baseline to 3 months.

ResultsThe PCSxCPSS interaction significantly improved prediction for physical function ({Delta}R2 = 0.02, p = .02). Higher baseline self-efficacy predicted better physical function ({beta} = 0.65, p < .001), but this effect weakened with higher levels of pain catastrophizing. The interaction also predicted change scores in physical function (p = .025) but was marginal after false discovery rate correction (p = .059). Additionally, a significant interaction emerged for loneliness change scores (p = .01): higher self-efficacy predicted greater reductions in loneliness, attenuated by higher catastrophizing.

ConclusionPain self-efficacy interacted with pain catastrophizing to predict physical function and loneliness at 3 months. Greater self-efficacy was associated with better outcomes, with associations diminished with higher levels of pain catastrophizing. Findings highlight the moderating role of adaptive and maladaptive cognitions and suggest interventions should address both processes to optimize recovery in physical and social functioning.

Key MessageAn interaction between pain catastrophizing and pain self-efficacy predicted physical function and changes in loneliness at 3 months. Greater self-efficacy was associated with better physical function and greater decreases in loneliness, but these associations weakened as catastrophizing increased. These findings highlight how maladaptive and adaptive pain-related cognitions interacted to predict physical and social function in chronic pain.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Raney, E. M., Dildine, T. C., Kim, S., Mackey, S. C., You, D. S. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.06.15.26355697</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pain Catastrophizing, Pain Self-Efficacy, and their Interaction as Predictors of Health  Outcomes in Chronic Pain]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.06.23.26356401v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Fairness-aware, explainable clinical decision support for opioid use disorder risk stratification: development and internal validation of a dual-layer AI system 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.06.23.26356401v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
Opioid use disorder (OUD) remains a leading cause of preventable death in the United States, yet the tools used to assess OUD risk rely on episodic self-report, produce binary output, and exhibit documented performance disparities across demographic groups that can widen existing inequities in care. Machine-learning models for OUD risk are seldom evaluated for demographic fairness or designed for the transparency clinicians need to trust and act on them. We present a fairness-aware, explainable clinical decision support system for four-tier OUD risk stratification, developed and internally validated on a large electronic health record-derived cohort accessed via Mayo Clinic Platform_Discover. The system pairs an XGBoost classifier with a transparent Clinical Rules Engine that attributes risk across six clinical domains, providing clinician-interpretable explanations alongside each prediction. To address demographic disparity directly, we applied an iterative bias-mitigation strategy combining age-balanced resampling, removal of race as a model input, and cost-sensitive reweighting, and measured its effect using group-fairness metrics (demographic parity, equal opportunity, equalized odds, and calibration within groups). On a held-out internal test set, mitigation reduced the White-Black gap in high-risk detection from 30.3 to 7.4 percentage points (a 76% relative reduction) and the age-based accuracy gap from 6.6 to 2.7 percentage points (59% reduction), raising high-risk detection for Black patients from 58.3% to 75.0%, at a cost of fewer than two percentage points of overall accuracy; gender differences remained below three points. The system was independently qualified through Mayo Clinic Platform_Solutions Studio. This work offers an implementable, transparent blueprint for operationalizing fairness and explainability in clinical AI for high-risk prescribing, with external and prospective validation as the clear next steps.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Kazgan, M., Mohammadvand, N., Cetin, B. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.06.23.26356401</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Fairness-aware, explainable clinical decision support for opioid use disorder risk stratification: development and internal validation of a dual-layer AI system]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.06.21.26356167v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Associations Among Changes in Inflammatory Biomarkers, Pain Intensity, and Health-Related Quality of Life Following a 12-Week Aerobic Exercise Programme in Individuals with Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.06.21.26356167v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
BackgroundNon-specific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP) is associated with persistent pain, reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and low-grade systemic inflammation. This study examined associations among changes in inflammatory biomarkers, pain intensity, and HRQoL following a 12-week aerobic exercise programme.

MethodsThis secondary analysis used data from a randomized controlled trial involving 41 participants with NSCLBP (intervention, n = 21; control, n = 20). Participants received either supervised aerobic exercise plus health education or health education alone for 12 weeks. Change scores for tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-), interleukin-6 (IL-6), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), pain intensity, and HRQoL domains were analysed using correlation and multiple regression analyses.

ResultsImprovements in IL-6 (r = 0.434, p = 0.005) and hs-CRP (r = 0.444, p = 0.004) were significantly associated with improvements in pain intensity. No significant associations were observed between biomarker changes and HRQoL domains. Treatment allocation was the strongest independent predictor of improvement in physical HRQoL ({beta} = 0.492, p = 0.017) and pain intensity ({beta} = -0.512, p = 0.006).

ConclusionsImprovements in IL-6 and hs-CRP were associated with reductions in pain intensity but not with improvements in HRQoL. Treatment allocation was the strongest predictor of clinical improvement, suggesting that mechanisms beyond systemic inflammation may contribute to the benefits of aerobic exercise in NSCLBP.

Plain Language SummaryNon-specific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP) is a common condition that can cause persistent pain, reduce daily functioning, and negatively affect quality of life. Research suggests that low-grade inflammation may contribute to pain persistence, but it remains unclear how changes in inflammation relate to improvements in pain and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) following exercise-based rehabilitation.

This study examined the relationships among changes in inflammatory biomarkers, pain intensity, and HRQoL following a 12-week aerobic exercise programme in people with NSCLBP. Forty-one participants completed either a supervised aerobic exercise programme combined with health education or health education alone. Changes in inflammatory biomarkers (IL-6, hs-CRP, and TNF-), pain intensity, and HRQoL were assessed over the intervention period.

The findings showed that improvements in IL-6 and hs-CRP were associated with reductions in pain intensity. However, changes in inflammatory biomarkers were not significantly associated with improvements in HRQoL. The strongest predictor of improvements in both pain and physical HRQoL was participation in the aerobic exercise programme.

These findings suggest that aerobic exercise can improve outcomes in people with NSCLBP, but the benefits may not be explained solely by reductions in inflammation. Other factors, including physical, psychological, and behavioural changes associated with exercise, may also contribute to recovery and improved well-being.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Nweke, V. C., Fatai, K. E., Madume, A. K., Ojukwu, C. P., Onyekwelu, A. I., Nwosu, A. O., Nweke, Q. k., Nweke, A. C., Ezema, C. I. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-23</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.06.21.26356167</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Associations Among Changes in Inflammatory Biomarkers, Pain Intensity, and Health-Related Quality of Life Following a 12-Week Aerobic Exercise Programme in Individuals with Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.06.12.26355509v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Supporting people to access social security payments through the Special Rules for End of Life: a qualitative study of the perspectives of patients, carers and health care professionals 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.06.12.26355509v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
BackgroundPeople living with terminal illness face a double financial burden from additional costs and loss of earning for themselves and their carers. Social security benefits are intended to help alleviate some of this financial pressure, and in the UK and other countries people are eligible for fast-tracked access to financial support via the  Special Rules for End of Life. One in 3 people who are eligible miss out on this support, yet there is limited evidence on the reasons for this take-up deficit.

ObjectivesThe aim of this study is to understand the barriers and facilitators to claiming benefits for terminally ill people from the perspectives of patients, carers, and health care professionals.

MethodsThis is a qualitative study combining i) focus groups with healthcare professionals recruited via professional networks and social media, and ii) interviews with patients and carers recruited in hospital and hospice settings. We analysed the data using Practical Thematic Analysis

ResultsFifty-five multidisciplinary healthcare professionals participated in 11 focus groups, and we interviewed 10 patients and carers. We constructed five descriptive themes to summarise the data: Navigating priorities and uncertainty; positive impacts alongside a sense of shame and stigma; talking about money, difficulties and dividends; everybodys - yet nobodys - responsibility; and sticking points in the system.

ConclusionThe themes reveal several challenges that may contribute to people not taking up this financial support. However, discussions about access to benefits were also seen as a core part of holistic care, a positive way to offer support and a gateway to other discussions about end-of-life care preferences and decisions. Recommendations for policy and practice include evaluating the adoption of a diagnostic rather than a prognostic eligibility criteria, integrating discussions about benefits into existing processes such as advance care planning, and improving education and support for clinicians.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Davies, J. M., Marshall, S., Hussain, J., Diggle, M., French, M., Stone, J., Fimister, G., Ogden, M., Sleeman, K. E., Bradshaw, A., Harding, R. E. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-15</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.06.12.26355509</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Supporting people to access social security payments through the Special Rules for End of Life: a qualitative study of the perspectives of patients, carers and health care professionals]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.06.10.26355353v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
"We don't complain; it's just part of being a woman": frequency, knowledge, and sociocultural beliefs about dysmenorrhoea in a South African university cohort 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.06.10.26355353v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
IntroductionDysmenorrhoea is highly prevalent globally and interferes with engagement in education, work, social participation, and quality of life. Although evidence suggests that sociocultural beliefs influence how menstrual pain is understood and managed, relatively little research has explored dysmenorrhoea-related knowledge and beliefs within South Africa. This study aimed to (1) determine the frequency of dysmenorrhoea, (2) assess dysmenorrhoea-related knowledge and compare knowledge between menstruating and non-menstruating individuals, and (3) explore commonly held generational, cultural, and religious beliefs related to dysmenorrhoea in a South African university cohort.

MethodsWe analysed data collected as part of a cross-sectional survey conducted among staff and students at a South African university. Participants completed demographic questions, items assessing dysmenorrhoea-related knowledge, and an adapted Working Ability, Location, Intensity, Days of Pain, Dysmenorrhoea (WaLIDD) questionnaire. Participants were also invited to provide free-text responses describing generational, cultural, and religious beliefs about dysmenorrhoea. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively and compared between menstruating and non-menstruating participants. Free-text responses were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

ResultsA total of 863 participants completed the survey, including 578 current or past menstruators. The frequency (95%CI) of dysmenorrhoea was 75.4% (71.7-78.9). Most participants were classified as having moderate (53%) or severe (31%) dysmenorrhoea on the WaLIDD scale. Awareness of dysmenorrhoea was higher among participants who had menstruated than among those who had never menstruated (80.4% vs 55.3%, p<0.001). Most participants (85.1%) reported wanting more education about dysmenorrhoea and its impact. Reflexive thematic analysis of 246 free-text responses identified five themes: (1) menstrual pain is normalised, dismissed, and expected to endure, (2) reproductive meanings attached to menstrual pain, (3) moral, spiritual, and cultural interpretations of menstrual pain, (4) negotiating competing explanations for menstrual pain, and (5) managing and controlling menstrual pain symptoms. Across themes, dysmenorrhoea was interpreted through social, cultural, reproductive, spiritual, and biomedical frameworks that shaped how pain was understood, communicated, and managed.

ConclusionDysmenorrhoea is common in this South African university cohort, and is rarely understood as a purely biological symptom. Instead, menstrual pain is understood and managed through broader social, cultural, reproductive, moral, and biomedical narratives, which shape how pain is recognised, disclosed, legitimised, and treated. These findings highlight the importance of considering sociocultural beliefs alongside clinical factors when developing menstrual health education, support strategies, and healthcare services.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Bedwell, G. J., Madden, V. J., Isaacs, A., Khorommbi, H., Moloi, N., Papaioannou, G., Solomons, S., Sudan, S., Parker, R. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-10</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.06.10.26355353</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA["We don't complain; it's just part of being a woman": frequency, knowledge, and sociocultural beliefs about dysmenorrhoea in a South African university cohort]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.06.01.26354382v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Safety and Tolerability of Low Intensity Focused Ultrasound to the Anterior Insula in Patients with Fibromyalgia 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.06.01.26354382v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
BackgroundLow-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) is an emerging noninvasive neuromodulation technique capable of targeting deep cortical and subcortical structures with high spatial precision. In healthy human volunteers, LIFU has demonstrated a favorable safety and tolerability profile across multiple studies. However, its safety and tolerability in clinical populations remains poorly characterized, representing a critical barrier to clinical translation. Here, we prospectively evaluate the safety and tolerability of LIFU targeting the left dorsal anterior insula (dAI) in patients with fibromyalgia (FM).

MethodsIn a single-blind, sham-controlled, within-subjects crossover design, 13 individuals with FM (43.1 {+/-} 13.2 years; 12 female) received 10 minutes of active LIFU (500 kHz, 1 kHz PRF, 36% duty cycle, 4.2 W/cm2 Isppa; 100 x 1-second pulse trains with a 5-second inter-train interval) targeting the left dorsal anterior insula (dAI) or sham on separate visits. Safety was evaluated through neuroradiological review of post vs. pre LIFU FLAIR MRI, quantitative voxel-wise FLAIR analysis, and patient report of symptoms (ROS). Tolerability was assessed using an experience assessment. Efficacy of the LIFU intervention was assessed using quantitative sensory testing (QST) including temporal summation of pain (TSP) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM).

ResultsNeuroradiological review identified no new evidence of edema, microhemorrhage, acute ischemia, or white matter injury on post-LIFU structural imaging. Quantitative FLAIR analysis using contralateral-mirror-referenced relative FLAIR (rFLAIR) showed no significant within-subject change in the stimulated beam volume ({Delta}rFLAIR = 0.002 {+/-} 0.025, t(12) = 0.30, P = 0.769, Cohens dz = 0.08). No serious adverse events were documented and ROS indicated no change due to LIFU sonication. Participants rated the procedure as comfortable and could not distinguish active from sham LIFU. LIFU did not result in statistically significant changes for TSP (p = 0.797) or CPM (p = 0.465).

ConclusionsTen minutes of LIFU targeting the left dAI was safe and well tolerated in individuals with FM, with no neuroradiological or quantitative MRI evidence of tissue effects and no serious adverse events. Blinding was preserved, and participants rated the procedure as comfortable. Although no significant changes were observed in experimental pain measures, these findings support the feasibility of targeting deep salience and pain amplification circuitry with LIFU in patients with FM and provide a foundation for adequately powered efficacy trials.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Kapoor, A., Ni, Y., Isaac, G., Keyes, D. C. V., Russo-Stringer, E. A., Legon, W. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-09</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.06.01.26354382</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Safety and Tolerability of Low Intensity Focused Ultrasound to the Anterior Insula in Patients with Fibromyalgia]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.06.05.26355003v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Associations between initial treatments for acute low back pain and opioid use disorder and overdose risk in Medicaid patients 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.06.05.26355003v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
IntroductionAcute low back pain is a leading cause of disability worldwide. Clinical guidelines recommend non-pharmacological therapies as first-line treatment and advise caution with opioid prescribing. However pharmacological therapies, including opioids and gabapentinoids, remain commonly used. The comparative risks of subsequent opioid use disorder (OUD) and overdose diagnosis associated with initial treatment modality in large, real-world populations is not well characterized. We estimated the incidence of new-onset OUD and overdose diagnosis among opioid-naive, Medicaid-insured adults with newly diagnosed acute low back pain and estimated the association between initial treatment modalities and subsequent OUD and overdose diagnosis risk.

MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using Medicaid T-MSIS Analytic files from 25 states (2016-2019). We identified opioid-naive adults with a new diagnosis of acute low back pain who initiated pharmacologic or non-pharmacologic treatment within 1 month of diagnosis. The primary outcome was incident OUD and overdose diagnosis (based on diagnosis codes in claims) during follow-up. Associations between initial treatment modality and OUD and overdose diagnosis risk were estimated using a non-parametric, doubly robust estimator to adjust for measured confounding.

ResultsThe cohort included 525,002 opioid-naive adults initiating treatment for low back pain. The cumulative incidence of OUD and overdose diagnosis was 1.5% and 2.4% at 7 and 13 months, respectively. Compared to non-use, use of gabapentinoids during the first month of treatment was associated with the highest relative risk (increasing risk by 130.1%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 117.8%, 142.3%), the second-highest relative risk was estimated for higher-dose opioids, defined as > 50 daily Morphine Milligram Equivalents (MME) (118.1%, 95% CI: 99.2%, 137.0%). Lower-dose, short-duration opioids ([&le;] 50 MME, [&le;] 7 days) were also associated with elevated risk, though substantially smaller in magnitude (20.8%, 95% CI: 13.8%, 27.9%). In contrast, non-pharmacologic, non-interventional therapies were associated with reduced OUD and overdose diagnosis risk, with physical therapy demonstrating the largest relative reduction of 34.0% (95% CI: -40.9%, -27.1%).

DiscussionIn opioid-naive Medicaid patients with acute low back pain, initial non-pharmacologic treatment was associated with reduced OUD and overdose diagnosis risk. Gabapentinoids and opioids were each associated with increased risk; for opioids, the degree of risk increased with higher doses and durations. These results support guideline recommendations favoring non-pharmacologic treatment as first-line therapy and indicate the importance of cautious prescribing when pharmacologic treatment is considered.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Doan, L. V., Hung, A. M., Olfson, M., Williams, N. T., Rudolph, K. E. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-08</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.06.05.26355003</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Associations between initial treatments for acute low back pain and opioid use disorder and overdose risk in Medicaid patients]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.06.05.26354913v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Validation of the Fremantle Perineal Awareness Questionnaire (FrePAQ) in women with Chronic Pelvic Pain 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.06.05.26354913v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
BackgroundChronic pelvic pain (CPP) affects up to 26% of women worldwide. While its pathophysiology is poorly understood, disturbances in body perception have been identified in various similar chronic musculoskeletal disorders. The Fremantle Perineal Awareness Questionnaire (FrePAQ) is a novel tool designed to specifically assess disturbed body perception in the pelvic region, but its structural validity and reliability require formal evaluation.

MethodsPatient partners with lived experience contributed to study design. Participants with (n=417 and without (n=277) chronic pelvic pain completed the FrePAQ at baseline, as well as one week later. We assessed the validity and reliability of the FrePAQ following COSMIN guidelines for Classical Test Theory.

ResultsThe validated FrePAQ comprises a two-factor model, with a six-item Distress & Disconnection (D&D) subscale and a two-item Size & Shape (S&S) subscale. Confirmatory analysis showed excellent fit (CFI = .988; RMSEA = .048) and measurement invariance between diagnostic groups. Internal consistency was high ( = .838 CPP; .819 controls). Test-retest reliability was high for D&D (ICC = .863) and acceptable for S&S (ICC = .695). FrePAQ scores showed a weak-moderate correlation with pain scores (r = .234-.255), psychological distress (r = .226-.443), and functional impact (r = .172-.295), particularly for the D&D subscale.

ConclusionThe FrePAQ is a reliable and valid instrument to measure perineal perceptual disturbances in CPP. Future research will evaluate the tools potential to support phenotyping and guide individualised interventions. Improved understanding of body perception disturbance in CPP can enhance diagnosis and treatment precision.

PerspectiveThis article validates the Fremantle Perineal Awareness Questionnaire (FrePAQ), the first measure of perineal body perception disturbance in chronic pelvic pain. The findings support body perception disturbance as a clinically relevant feature of chronic pelvic pain and provide a foundation for future research exploring its role in phenotyping, treatment selection, and treatment response.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Bond, J., O'Connel, N., Wand, B., Chalmers, J., Kal, E. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-08</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.06.05.26354913</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Validation of the Fremantle Perineal Awareness Questionnaire (FrePAQ) in women with Chronic Pelvic Pain]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.05.31.26354558v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Comparing cannabinoid extracts for treating cancer-related symptoms: a randomized placebo-controlled, triple-blind aggregate n-of-1 clinical trial 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.05.31.26354558v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
ContextDespite widespread use of medical cannabinoids for cancer-related symptom management, systematic reviews consistently call for more clinical trial evidence.

ObjectivesThis study aimed to determine and explore responses to medical cannabis extracts for cancer-related symptoms using patient-centred methodology.

MethodsAn aggregate N-of-1 study of clinically stable but symptomatic outpatients from 8 Canadian cancer centres, comparing three blinded sublingual extracts (THC; CBD; 1:1) with placebo, self-titrated within a prescribed schedule for four consecutive days each in randomized sequence for up to three cycles (total 16-48 days). The primary outcome was the frequency of at least a 1.4-point (20%) improvement in a 7-point Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) for at least one extract over placebo.

ResultsThe primary outcome was achieved in 50/89 (56%) participants (p<0.001), with no significant preference of one extract over another on average, but a clear preference between extracts for most individuals. Changes in a modified Edmonton Symptom Assessment score and participant preference (n=91) confirmed these findings. Improved sleep, tiredness and anxiety contributed most to the overall improvement regardless of primary symptom. There were no demographic predictors of response. Mild adverse effects were common with all extracts including placebo but resolved rapidly on dose reduction/cessation. Moderate/severe adverse effects were rare but associated with THC.

ConclusionsMedical cannabis extracts can be meaningfully beneficial for cancer-related symptoms in approximately 50% of patients, particularly for sleep and related symptoms. A starting dose of 2.5mg of THC/CBD three times a day was well-tolerated. Personalization of treatment is required to optimize response.

Key MessagesThree cannabinoid extracts (THC; CBD; and 1:1) were significantly more effective than placebo based on a Patient Global Impression of Change, a modified Edmonton Symptom Assessment System and participant preference. The most helpful extract differed between individuals. Benefits were mostly in sleep, anxiety, and daytime tiredness irrespective of primary symptom.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Hawley, P. H., Wade, K., Daeninck, P., Fitzgibbon, E., Kerba, M., Goldie, C., Kopoplovic, I. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-02</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.05.31.26354558</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparing cannabinoid extracts for treating cancer-related symptoms: a randomized placebo-controlled, triple-blind aggregate n-of-1 clinical trial]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.05.29.26354422v1?rss=1">
<title>
<![CDATA[
Patient perceptions towards psychedelics for musculoskeletal pain: A cross-sectional survey 
]]>
</title>
<link>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.05.29.26354422v1?rss=1
</link>
<description><![CDATA[
BackgroundPsychedelics are emerging as potential management options for chronic musculoskeletal pain due to preliminary evidence of effectiveness and low addictive potential, but patients perceptions remain unknown. This study assessed patient perceptions regarding psilocybin for musculoskeletal pain.

MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey of adults ([&ge;]19) with musculoskeletal pain attending a hospital-based orthopaedic clinic. Participants reported demographics, perceptions of psychedelics for pain management, and willingness to participate in psychedelic research. Multivariable regression explored factors associated with perceived analgesic potential, and willingness to try a full therapeutic dose of psilocybin or a microdose.

ResultsAmong 295 participants, 73% reported moderate-to-severe pain; 75% used analgesics; of these, 41% used opioids (86/209). While 24% reported prior psychedelic use, only 3% had discussed psychedelics with a healthcare provider. Most perceived that psilocybin had moderate-to-high effectiveness for pain (76%). Most respondents endorsed a moderate-to-high willingness to try microdoses (58%) and macrodoses (53%) of psilocybin for pain. Prior non-therapeutic psychedelic use predicted a 1.05-unit increase in perceived analgesic potential on the 10-point scale (p=.013). Willingness to try a macrodose of psilocybin was most strongly associated with prior non-therapeutic (B=3.16) and therapeutic (B=2.42) psychedelic use; in contrast, pain severity had a significant but modest association, with a 0.21-point increase in willingness for every 1-unit increase in pain severity (p=.017). Similarly, willingness to try a microdose of psilocybin was predicted by non-therapeutic (B=2.82) and therapeutic (B=2.48) use, whereas the effects of pain severity (B=0.20) and younger age (B=-0.30) were significant but small. Most respondents (52%) reported moderate-to-high willingness to participate in a trial of psilocybin for pain relief, and health risks were the primary concern (33%).

ConclusionsStudy findings suggest a majority hold neutral-to-positive perceptions of psilocybin for pain. Addressing perceived barriers, including health effects and gaps in patient knowledge, should be considered when designing future trials.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Li, E. J., Mosharraf, B., Ali, H., Noyes, M., Doshi, P., Wallace, C., Petranker, R., Adili, A., Khan, M., Busse, J. W., MacKillop, J., Madden, K. ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.64898/2026.05.29.26354422</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Patient perceptions towards psychedelics for musculoskeletal pain: A cross-sectional survey]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section></prism:section>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
