medrxiv Subject Collection: Health Informatics
http://medrxiv.org
This feed contains articles for medRxiv Subject Collection "Health Informatics"
medrxivmedrxivhttps://www.medrxiv.org/sites/default/files/medrxiv_internal_logo.png
http://medrxiv.org
<![CDATA[
Methodological Adherence, Reporting Completeness, and Risk of Bias in AI-Assisted Systematic Reviews: A Matched Meta-Research Study
]]>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.11.06.26367388v1?rss=1
2026-11-08doi:10.64898/2026.11.06.26367388Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory2026-11-08
<![CDATA[
Agentic Pipeline for Large-Scale Clinical Data Queries in Enterprise Electronic Health Records
]]>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.11.05.26367378v1?rss=1
2026-11-06doi:10.64898/2026.11.05.26367378Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory2026-11-06
<![CDATA[
A Cross-Dataset Audit of Discrimination and Conformal Prediction Coverage in Keystroke-Based Parkinson's Disease Classi cation
]]>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.11.04.26366890v1?rss=1
2026-11-06doi:10.64898/2026.11.04.26366890Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory2026-11-06
<![CDATA[
An explainable, bias-audited machine learning model to detect hidden hepatitis C from region-wide real-world health records
]]>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.11.05.26367298v1?rss=1
2026-11-06doi:10.64898/2026.11.05.26367298Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory2026-11-06
<![CDATA[
Figure format and the accuracy of AI-assisted reconstruction of Kaplan-Meier survival data
]]>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.11.03.26367147v1?rss=1
2026-11-05doi:10.64898/2026.11.03.26367147Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory2026-11-05
<![CDATA[
Deep learning screening of otoscopic images for ENT referral: development, validation and deployment of NHREF OtoScan
]]>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.11.04.26367286v1?rss=1
2026-11-05doi:10.64898/2026.11.04.26367286Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory2026-11-05
<![CDATA[
Application of Machine Learning and Deep Learning in diagnosis Covid19
]]>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.11.01.26367023v1?rss=1
2026-11-05doi:10.64898/2026.11.01.26367023Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory2026-11-05
<![CDATA[
First-trimester nocturnal cardiorespiratory coupling during home sleep testing and later pregnancy complications: a secondary analysis of the nuMoM2b cohort
]]>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.11.02.26367117v1?rss=1
5 events/h. Holm correction was applied across outcomes. GDM was associated with lower respiration-to-heart rate coupling strength (cumulative odds ratio, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.31-0.64; P < 0.001) and shallower slope at the anchor point (0.63; 0.45-0.89; P = 0.03). Fetal macrosomia was associated with lower within-night variability in heart rate-to-respiration waveform irregularity (0.59; 0.45-0.77; P < 0.001). No associations with preeclampsia or preterm birth remained significant after correction. Direction-specific differences in nocturnal CRC were detectable in the first trimester in pregnancies that later developed GDM or resulted in fetal macrosomia.
]]>2026-11-05doi:10.64898/2026.11.02.26367117Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory2026-11-05
<![CDATA[
Evaluating uncertainty for detecting performance loss and guiding deferral after model transfer between hospital systems
]]>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.11.03.26367064v1?rss=1
2026-11-04doi:10.64898/2026.11.03.26367064Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory2026-11-04
<![CDATA[
Unsupervised Phenotypic Stratification of 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome for Improved Clinical Screening
]]>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.30.26366765v1?rss=1
2026-11-02doi:10.64898/2026.10.30.26366765Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory2026-11-02
<![CDATA[
Same answer, different reasons: AI-moderated interviews uncover topics and reasoning that surveys miss.
]]>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.11.01.26367029v1?rss=1
2026-11-02doi:10.64898/2026.11.01.26367029Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory2026-11-02
<![CDATA[
Preceding organ trajectories guide dynamic reassessment after apparent stabilisation in sepsis
]]>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.11.01.26367016v1?rss=1
2026-11-02doi:10.64898/2026.11.01.26367016Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory2026-11-02
<![CDATA[
Analytic Interoperability Framework for High-Fidelity Representation of Perioperative Electronic Health Record Data in the OMOP Common Data Model Using Clinical Representation and Analytic Concept Reconstruction
]]>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.30.26366954v1?rss=1
99% cohort concordance. Among 31,083 shared encounters, reconstructed analytic variables showed high agreement, with meaningful differences primarily involving vasopressor infusion identification, body mass index selection, and payer assignment; admission source accounted for most discordant cohort assignments.
DiscussionConcept equivalence alone incompletely characterized analytic interoperability. Reconstruction of clinical representations and analytic concepts from standardized OMOP concepts preserved analytic fidelity despite incomplete exact concept matching.
ConclusionsComplex perioperative EHR data can be represented within OMOP with high implementation fidelity despite imperfect concept equivalence. Evaluating preservation of clinically meaningful analytic concepts, rather than vocabulary equivalence alone, provides a practical framework for interoperable perioperative research.
]]>2026-11-02doi:10.64898/2026.10.30.26366954Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory2026-11-02
<![CDATA[
Questioning the Benchmarks: Hidden Circularity in AQ-10 Autism Screening Datasets
]]>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.11.01.26367003v1?rss=1
2026-11-02doi:10.64898/2026.11.01.26367003Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory2026-11-02
<![CDATA[
Pheno+: An Electronic Health Record-Integrated, Clinician-in-the-Loop Application for Efficient Phenotyping in Clinical Genomics
]]>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.11.02.26366992v1?rss=1
2026-11-02doi:10.64898/2026.11.02.26366992Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory2026-11-02
<![CDATA[
Identifying interstitial lung disease with large language models on clinical notes and claims
]]>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.30.26366942v1?rss=1
2026-11-02doi:10.64898/2026.10.30.26366942Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory2026-11-02
<![CDATA[
Triage Advice From General-Purpose Language Models in Health and Everyday Situations
]]>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.31.26366978v1?rss=1
2026-11-02doi:10.64898/2026.10.31.26366978Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory2026-11-02
<![CDATA[
A decision-only model as a low-cost judge of medical AI answers
]]>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.30.26366939v1?rss=1
2026-11-02doi:10.64898/2026.10.30.26366939Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory2026-11-02
<![CDATA[
Comparing Machine Learning Methods for Detecting Caregiver Burden in Transcribed Conversations with Clinicians
]]>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.30.26366925v1?rss=1
2026-11-02doi:10.64898/2026.10.30.26366925Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory2026-11-02
<![CDATA[
Algorithmic design choices as determinants of health equity: a causal simulation study of healthcare resource allocation
]]>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.30.26366732v1?rss=1
2026-11-01doi:10.64898/2026.10.30.26366732Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory2026-11-01
<![CDATA[
Machine Learning Based Detection of Chronic Kidney Disease using Full Blood Count from a Ghanaian Hospital Population with an Integrated Web Application
]]>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.27.26366677v1?rss=1
2026-10-31doi:10.64898/2026.10.27.26366677Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory2026-10-31
<![CDATA[
Prototyping OSA: A New Framework for Predicting Cardiovascular Outcomes and CPAP Benefit
]]>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.30.26366770v1?rss=1
2026-10-30doi:10.64898/2026.10.30.26366770Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory2026-10-30
<![CDATA[
Deep learning reveals prognostic information beyond AJCC stage in routine histopathology of early-stage melanoma: the population-based D-ESMEL study
]]>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.29.26366599v1?rss=1
5,500 patients following a nested case-control (NCC) design with stage-matched controls (n=266). We developed an end- to-end deep learning workflow to automatically extract relevant patches from WSIs and predict patient-level metastatic risk based on histopathological features independent of AJCC stage. The discovery set served as a training set for the workflow using 10-fold cross-validation. The prognostic performance of this model and its independence from clinical risk factors was evaluated in the validation cohort using odds ratios (OR) and the weighted C-index.
We achieved a balanced accuracy of 0{middle dot}88 ({micro}: 0{middle dot}81; 95% CI: 0{middle dot}77-0{middle dot}85) in the best validation fold of the discovery set. In the validation cohort, metastatic risk predictions from the deep learning model were an independent prognostic factor (adjusted OR: 1{middle dot}97; p<0{middle dot}01). Combining the deep learning predictions (C-index: 0{middle dot}86) with AJCC stage (C-index: 0{middle dot}80) yielded the highest C-index of 0{middle dot}87, significantly improving the C-index compared to AJCC stage alone (p<0{middle dot}001).
Our histopathology-based deep learning model was rigorously evaluated in a population-based cohort and demonstrated added prognostic value beyond AJCC stage. Further investigations of the underlying biological features could improve clinical decision making and patient outcomes.
]]>2026-10-30doi:10.64898/2026.10.29.26366599Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory2026-10-30
<![CDATA[
Methodological Pitfalls in Predicting Criteria-Defined Outcomes from Routine ICU Data Illustrated by Pediatric Sepsis
]]>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.29.26366505v1?rss=1
2026-10-30doi:10.64898/2026.10.29.26366505Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory2026-10-30
<![CDATA[
Measuring digital practice across a heterogeneous clinical workforce: a task-level, profession-stratified survey of digital work by allied health professionals
]]>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.29.26366871v1?rss=1
2026-10-30doi:10.64898/2026.10.29.26366871Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory2026-10-30
<![CDATA[
DiaBench: A Benchmarking Framework to Evaluate the Performance of LLMs in T2D Patient Education
]]>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.26.26366562v1?rss=1
2026-10-29doi:10.64898/2026.10.26.26366562Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory2026-10-29
<![CDATA[
Using iterative agentic retrieval-augmented generation to refine the risk of infection from social contexts during the COVID-19 pandemic: Development and Evaluation Study
]]>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.28.26366693v1?rss=1
2026-10-29doi:10.64898/2026.10.28.26366693Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory2026-10-29
<![CDATA[
Photograph-Based Skeletal Malocclusion Screening with Geometric Machine Learning: External Validation Across Turkish and Non-European Cohorts
]]>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.28.26366413v1?rss=1
0.7), while specificity fell from 0.766 in the Turkish external cohort to 0.697 in the non-European cohort. AUC was 0.902 and 0.835 respectively (difference 0.066; p=0.029). In the Class I and Class II task the corresponding values were 0.875 and 0.723 (difference 0.152; p<0.001). A subgroup analysis showed lower sensitivity in children than adults across both cohorts (0.71-0.80 versus 0.89-0.90). AUC was lower in the non-European cohort for all three models in both tasks. The observed performance differences are consistent with a population-specific generalizability effect rather than model-specific failure and support mandatory external validation on target populations before clinical deployment.
]]>2026-10-29doi:10.64898/2026.10.28.26366413Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory2026-10-29
<![CDATA[
Performance of a foundation model to generate thousands of predicted outcomes across multiple use cases
]]>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.28.26366723v1?rss=1
2026-10-29doi:10.64898/2026.10.28.26366723Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory2026-10-29
<![CDATA[
Multi-modal data Integration for Metastatic Risk Prediction of AJCC Stage I/II Melanomas: Results from the Population-based Dutch Early-stage Melanoma Study (D-ESMEL)
]]>
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.29.26366608v1?rss=1
5,500 stage I/II melanoma patients. We evaluated four integration strategies (early, intermediate, mixed, and late) using a repeated (n=5) nested 3-fold cross-validation in the discovery set. The best-performing models were evaluated in the validation cohort using the odds ratios (ORs) and a weighted C-index reflecting performance in the sampled population.
In the discovery set, intermediate integration of genomics and transcriptomics achieved the highest balanced accuracy ({micro}: 0{middle dot}62; 95% CI: 0{middle dot}57-0{middle dot}66). Early and late integration of transcriptomics and pathomics, and the unimodal transcriptomics model showed similar performance ({micro}: 0{middle dot}61; 95% CI: 0{middle dot}58-0{middle dot}65). In the validation cohort both early integration, late integration, and the unimodal transcriptomics model achieved the highest balanced accuracy of 0{middle dot}60{middle dot} When adjusted for clinicopathological risk factors early integration remained an independent prognostic factor for metastasis (OR 1{middle dot}75; p<0{middle dot}01), outperforming transcriptomics alone (OR 1{middle dot}26; p<0{middle dot}01). Early integration reached a weighted C-index of 0{middle dot}83 outperforming AJCC stage (0{middle dot}81 C-index). When combined the population-weighted C-index was significantly improved to 0{middle dot}85 (p<0{middle dot}01).
Early integration of transcriptomics and pathomics outperformed all unimodal models and improved prediction of distant metastasis independently of AJCC stage. Understanding the biological mechanisms underlying these predictions may further support clinical decision-making.
]]>2026-10-29doi:10.64898/2026.10.29.26366608Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory2026-10-29